Film review

Independence Day

1996 · Directed by Roland Emmerich · 2h 25m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceThe planet is in danger, but nobody is giving up their chance to deliver a good line

ActionAdventureScience Fiction

An alien invasion threatens the United States, bringing civilians, military personnel and the president into the same crisis. Will Smith plays Captain Steven Hiller, Bill Pullman is President Thomas J. Whitmore and Jeff Goldblum is David Levinson. As the scale of the threat becomes clear, they face an emergency beyond their experience. The story moves among those trying to understand the danger and those expected to respond to it, bringing science fiction, disaster and warfare together. Mary McDonnell, Judd Hirsch and Robert Loggia also appear, as Marilyn Whitmore, Julius Levinson and General William Grey.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Roland Emmerich’s alien invasion film earns its size with patient menace and enormous destruction. The script is foolish, the patriotism overdone, but the cast makes the business of saving the world unusually cheerful.

Independence Day is good, foolish entertainment, and Roland Emmerich understands how much waiting an alien invasion needs before the destruction can begin. He wants the audience frightened enough to pay attention and comfortable enough to enjoy itself. We recommend it for the scale, the cast and the patient preparation, with a warning that the writing becomes much less convincing once the spectacle has to support a story. Its ambitions are straightforward, and for a substantial stretch it meets them.

Karl Walter Lindenlaub’s cinematography makes the shadows do useful work: the threat is frightening before the damage has even started. We were unnerved by the way familiar places seemed suddenly defenceless under that darkness. There is time to look and to imagine what might follow. The effects give the invasion enough physical weight to sustain that feeling without requiring much explanation. This is the strongest part of the film, when the danger has arrived and nobody has a satisfactory response.

Production designers Patrick Tatopoulos and Oliver Scholl give the threatened world sufficient solidity to make its destruction count. Recognisable American landmarks supply a ready sense of scale, and Emmerich knows how readily an audience reads them. We do not need a lengthy account of what a building represents to understand the shock of seeing it threatened. The design and effects serve the same practical purpose, keeping the size of the danger clear.

Will Smith, as Captain Steven Hiller, gives the film an ease that all this grand machinery badly needs. Jeff Goldblum’s David Levinson is just as useful, bringing enough individual character to keep the dialogue from sounding entirely manufactured. Their appeal matters because the screenplay offers types more readily than people. Bill Pullman’s President Thomas J. Whitmore has the harder assignment, making official seriousness watchable amid such cheerful nonsense. The ensemble keeps us interested in who is facing the danger, even when the characters have been supplied with little depth.

The screenplay by Emmerich and Dean Devlin is much less reliable whenever excitement depends on believing what we are being told. Implausibility is part of the bargain with an alien invasion film, but it is still fair to expect the human behaviour to make sense. Here, thin characterisation and patriotic insistence too often substitute for persuasion. The generous mood helps, yet the insistence that American heroism should stand in for everybody’s experience grows tiresome, especially in a film that makes such broad claims on our sympathy.

David Brenner’s editing gives the first half enough pace to manage the large cast without making every introduction feel like an interruption. Later, the weak plotting becomes harder to ignore, however briskly the film moves. David Arnold’s music helps sustain the excitement, giving the spectacle some of the exuberance missing from the dialogue. We have less patience for Emmerich’s insistence on heroics; the danger is enough to hold our attention without so much reassurance about the people confronting it. At 145 minutes, there is also more of that reassurance than we need.

As an alien invasion picture, this is happier with mass destruction than with making the invaders themselves interesting. That limits the fear once the initial menace has passed, but the mixture of disaster, warfare and broad comedy remains companionable. There is pleasure in a large-scale action film that wants its people to be liked, even when it writes them badly. Choose it for an evening of expansive, undemanding spectacle, provided flag-waving does not spoil the fun.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics find Independence Day entertaining despite its thin writing, with praise concentrated on the scale of the alien invasion and the effects-driven destruction. The spectacle supplies much of the excitement, while the upbeat mood and ordinary-people-as-heroes ensemble make the catastrophe surprisingly cheerful. Several reviews welcome its comic-book simplicity and cheerful mixture of science fiction, disaster film and action, accepting the corniness as part of the pleasure.

The reservations centre on implausible plotting, shallow characters and patriotic excess, though critics differ sharply on how much these matter. The New Yorker enjoys the film’s enthusiastic view of American patriotism, while Empire finds that enthusiasm excessive. The spread runs from warm approval to outright boredom: The Independent rejects the escapism itself, finding the villains insufficiently frightening and the character introductions pointless. Even favourable reviews tend to concede that the spectacle offers more than the script.

The New York Times
2 July 1996 · Janet Maslin
80*

The critic praises the film's gleeful, audience-friendly exhilaration and inspiring notions of bravery, noting its comic-book sensibility and spectacle as a welcome change from macho cynicism. They single out the well-wrought special effects and the ensemble of Everyman characters for making the sci-fi Armageddon entertaining and benign.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Kim Newman
75*

The critic praises the film's spectacular destruction and special effects as delivering on epic sci-fi imagery but criticizes the ridiculous script, patriotic excess, and implausible plot elements. She singles out the breadth of the visual spectacle for praise while noting the lack of depth.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 July 1996 · James Wolcott
75*

The review celebrates the film's massive scale of destruction and iconic targets like the exploding White House, structured like a three-act play with meta pop-culture awareness. It praises the director's awestruck tourist view of American patriotism and the entertaining, upbeat Armageddon despite the lack of subtext.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 July 1996 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The review calls it the biggest B-movie ever made, a spectacularly scaled mix of '50s sci-fi, disaster epics, and action that is unavoidably entertaining and cornball. It praises the sheer volume of effects-driven destruction and heroic elements while noting it lacks plausibility and is not always state-of-the-art.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 July 1996 · Kenneth Turan
60*

The critic highlights the spectacular special effects that revive the 1950s alien invasion genre with impressive visuals, shadows, and fast pacing. They single out the cornball script, cardboard characters, and stereotyping for complaint while noting the adolescent charm and effects work.

Read the full review →
The Independent
16 August 1996 · Ruth Picardie
20*

The critic finds the film a colossal bore that fails as escapist action due to a plot full of holes and uninteresting villains. She singles out the lack of proper scary antagonists and pointless character setups for complaint.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1997

Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Visual Effects

Amanda Award for Best Foreign Feature Film, 1997

Won
Amanda Award for Best Foreign Feature Film

BAFTA Film Awards, 1997

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Special Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 1997

Nominated
Best Dramatic Presentation

Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film, 1997

Nominated
Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 1997

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

MTV Movie Award for Best Action Sequence, 1997

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Action Sequence

MTV Movie Award for Best Breakthrough Performance, 1997

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Breakthrough Performance

MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, 1997

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss

MTV Movie Award for Best Male Performance, 1997

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Male Performance

MTV Movie Award for Best Movie, 1997

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Movie

Satellite Award for Best Editing, 1997

Won
Satellite Award for Best Editing

Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects, 1997

Won
Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects

Saturn Awards, 1997

Won
Best Director
Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

The War of the Worlds poster

The War of the Worlds

1953 · The invasion is less cheerful, and the human defences look no more adequate.

Attack the Block poster

Attack the Block

2011 · A smaller patch of London proves worth defending, with sharper jokes and characters.

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · Family bickering survives a monster attack, and the comedy makes the danger matter.

The Day the Earth Caught Fire poster

The Day the Earth Caught Fire

1961 · A newspaper office gives a planetary emergency human scale and a sceptical voice.

Shin Godzilla poster

Shin Godzilla

2016 · Another national emergency, this time with more procedural delay and less stirring rhetoric.