A modern white house stands elevated above trees on tall angled supports
Film review

Lethal Weapon 2

1989 · Directed by Richard Donner · 1h 54m · Medietilsynet 18

In a sentenceWe would happily watch Mel Gibson and Danny Glover argue about the parking

Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) continue their partnership as two cops caught up in a crime story that includes a high-speed chase and an explosive crash. Police work shares space with arguments and comedy as the two men deal with each other and the people around them. Leo Getz (Joe Pesci) joins a cast of characters that also includes Arjen Rudd (Joss Ackland), Pieter Vorstedt (Derrick O’Connor) and Rika Van Den Haas (Patsy Kensit). The action keeps returning to the partnership between Martin Riggs and Roger Murtaugh.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Richard Donner’s action sequel is good company whenever Mel Gibson and Danny Glover are arguing. Its awkward shifts between comedy and violence matter, but the central friendship makes the evening worthwhile.

Richard Donner’s Lethal Weapon 2 is a brisk, funny action sequel, worth an evening if two argumentative cops are your sort of company. It understands why a continuing partnership can be more interesting than another collection of criminals. Martin Riggs and Roger Murtaugh are comfortable enough together for irritation to count as affection, and Richard Donner lets that familiarity do much of the work. The trouble comes when the violence demands feelings the comedy has just encouraged us to put aside.

Mel Gibson gives Martin Riggs a restless energy that could quickly become tiresome without someone to answer it. Danny Glover makes Roger Murtaugh’s resistance funny without reducing him to a man who complains for a living. We believe these two enjoy each other’s company, even when the conversation suggests they have had quite enough of it. Their timing gives the exchanges a loose, familiar quality; the jokes rarely sound as though both actors are waiting for permission to laugh.

We were properly gripped by the high-speed chase, because the pursuit remains understandable as the danger increases. Stephen Goldblatt’s cinematography gives us enough visual information to follow the action, and Stuart Baird’s editing keeps it moving without making speed itself the whole attraction. The explosive crash delivers the expected jolt. Richard Donner is good at giving physical action a comic charge, though that same readiness to amuse becomes less helpful when the film wants its violence taken seriously.

Joe Pesci, as Leo Getz, is an effective extra nuisance in a film whose leads hardly need assistance generating friction. His insistence can be funny, although the performance occasionally feels like one more voice trying to fill a conversation that was lively enough already. The supporting cast has less room to establish the ease we get from Mel Gibson and Danny Glover. Patsy Kensit’s Rika Van Den Haas is particularly thinly felt, and the performance does little to make the character linger.

Jeffrey Boam’s screenplay has the more serious problem of deciding how much weight any given incident should carry. The jokes encourage us to treat danger lightly, then the harsher passages ask for an emotional commitment the film has not consistently earned. We can accept a buddy-cop thriller changing moods; the changes still need to feel like part of the same story. Here they sometimes feel as though the actors have been handed a different set of instructions.

J. Michael Riva’s production design is at its most useful when it gives the action clear spaces to move through. We notice the performers before we notice their surroundings, which is the right order here. The music credited to Michael Kamen, Eric Clapton and David Sanborn is less restrained, sometimes underlining excitement the pictures have already supplied. It helps maintain momentum, but a little less insistence would have left more room for the actors.

Within the buddy-cop formula, the convincing friendship is enough to make the familiar business welcome. Richard Donner knows the pleasure of watching capable actors disagree, and usually gives that pleasure enough space between the loud bits. The uneven handling of violence stops this being an easy recommendation to anyone who simply wants a comedy. If the action is what brought you here, stay for Mel Gibson and Danny Glover.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around Mel Gibson and Danny Glover’s rapport. Their convincing bond helps both the comedy and the action, and even less enthusiastic critics regard their shared charisma as a strength. The more positive reviews also credit the script’s pace and humour, finding enough energy and involvement to make the sequel entertaining rather than merely busy.

The spread is moderate, but the critics disagree sharply over how well the comedy sits alongside the violence. Variety finds the tone more consistent than in the first film, while Radio Times objects to an uneven script and an awkward mixture of laughs and brutality. The Los Angeles Times offers the clearest dissent, acknowledging professional craftsmanship but finding the result hollow and overblown. Reservations elsewhere include weak supporting performances, though these generally qualify the praise rather than overturn it.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Anne Thompson
75*

Thompson finds the sequel exhilarating and unusually engaging for its genre. She praises the twisting script for sustaining the action while deepening the bond between the two cops.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the sequel more tonally consistent and entertaining than the first film. It especially praises the humor and the onscreen rapport between Mel Gibson and Danny Glover.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
65*

The available text gives no clear overall verdict. It singles out the high-speed chase, explosive crash and helicopter rescue as action highlights.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 July 1989 · Janet Maslin
64*

The review’s verdict cannot be determined from the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones calls it the weakest entry in the cop series, criticizing its inconsistent script and awkward mix of comedy and violence. He praises the continuing rapport between Mel Gibson and Danny Glover, and finds Joe Pesci entertaining.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Lethal Weapon 2 worth watching?
Lethal Weapon 2 is worth watching for its funny, convincing central partnership and clear, brisk action; we score it 74 out of 100. Mel Gibson and Danny Glover make the familiar buddy-cop business enjoyable, though awkward shifts from comedy to harsher violence make it a less comfortable choice for anyone simply after a laugh.
How long is Lethal Weapon 2, and what is it rated?
Lethal Weapon 2 runs 1h 54m and is rated 18 by the Medietilsynet in Norway. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch Lethal Weapon 2 in Norway?
Lethal Weapon 2 is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from kr 39.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Lethal Weapon 2, and is it suitable for children?
Lethal Weapon 2 carries a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children under 15, with a high-speed chase, an explosive crash and harsher passages of violence. We find the shifts between jokes and serious danger uneven, so the comic partnership should not be mistaken for a promise of light viewing, particularly by those sensitive to violence.
How does Lethal Weapon 2 compare to Midnight Run?
Lethal Weapon 2 is the more action-led choice beside Midnight Run, which we recommend more readily for warm, sustained comic quarrelling. Both depend on two men making each other’s lives difficult, but Gibson and Glover contend with awkward shifts into harsher violence, while De Niro and Grodin’s conversations are so enjoyable that the pursuit sometimes feels like an interruption.
What should I watch after Lethal Weapon 2?
After Lethal Weapon 2, try Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88): A crime comedy built around two men who make each other’s lives unnecessarily difficult. Then The Guard (2011, Fi1m 78): A more abrasive police partnership, with dry humour and little patience for politeness; and Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84): British police paperwork gives way to action excess, with a friendship worth following.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1990

Nominated
Best Sound Editing

If you liked this, try…

  1. Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88)A crime comedy built around two men who make each other’s lives unnecessarily difficult.

  2. Police Story (1985) · not reviewed yetFor physical comedy and action that demand equal attention to timing.

  3. The Guard (2011, Fi1m 78)A more abrasive police partnership, with dry humour and little patience for politeness.

  4. The Nice Guys (2016) · not reviewed yetAnother mismatched partnership whose arguments are at least as enjoyable as the investigation.

  5. Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84)British police paperwork gives way to action excess, with a friendship worth following.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever