Lucy (Dakota Johnson) holding a phone while speaking to a man in a tuxedo
Film review

Materialists

2025 · Directed by Celine Song · 1h 56m · CCC 14

In a sentencePedro Pascal buys the drinks, Chris Evans has flatmates, and Dakota Johnson does the maths out loud

Lucy (Dakota Johnson) is a matchmaker in New York. Her firm pairs clients by height, salary, age and postcode, and she is good at it, though she is single herself. At a client’s wedding she meets Harry (Pedro Pascal), the groom’s brother, who is rich, unattached and interested. Working the same wedding as a waiter is John (Chris Evans), the actor she left years ago because neither of them could pay for anything. Lucy tells her clients that love is a numbers question. Over the following weeks, with Harry paying for dinner and John still sharing a flat, she has to decide whether she believes it. Celine Song writes and directs.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Celine Song’s second film treats dating as a marketplace and says so, in dialogue sharper than most romances manage. It is clever, well cast and a little cold, and when it finally asks us to feel something, it has not done the groundwork.

Celine Song’s first film, Past Lives (2023), was about two people who could not be together and said almost nothing about it. Her second is about three people who could be together and talk about little else. Lucy (Dakota Johnson) is a New York matchmaker who sorts her clients by height, salary and age and says marriage is a deal like any other. At a wedding she meets Harry (Pedro Pascal), the groom’s brother, who has money, and finds John (Chris Evans), the actor she left years ago, handing round the drinks. Materialists wants to be a romantic comedy that tells the truth about money. For an hour it is, and that honesty is also why it never gets warm.

The matchmaking scenes are where Song is sharpest. Clients sit across from Lucy and list what they will and will not accept, and she writes it down without a flicker, then goes home to a flat she cannot afford. Johnson plays her flat and quick, a woman who has turned her voice into a sales tool and cannot switch it off at dinner. Pascal gives Harry the ease of a man who has never been refused anything and is curious to see what it feels like. Their first dinner, in which she tells him to his face what he is worth on the market and he takes it as a compliment, is the best scene in the film. We laughed, then winced, because Lucy was pricing herself too.

Shabier Kirchner shoots the city in soft, late-afternoon light and stays close on faces. Anthony Gasparro’s design does the film’s class argument for it: Harry’s flat is a grey box of glass and stone with nothing on the surfaces, and John’s is a shared one with a sink full of dishes. Katina Danabassis puts Lucy in careful neutral tailoring, the wardrobe of someone dressing for the life she wants rather than the one she can pay for. Daniel Pemberton’s score is quiet and mostly keeps out of the way. Keith Fraase lets conversations run in long takes and leaves the pauses in, which suits the talk when the talk is good.

The trouble is John, or rather what the film has decided John is for. Evans plays him gently and well, a decent man who is broke and knows what it costs him, but the script gives him little to do beyond being poor and being kind. Johnson and Evans together are pleasant, and no more than that; we did not believe these two had once torn each other apart over a restaurant bill. When the film asks us to weigh him against Harry, the writing has already tilted the scales, and not in the direction the film thinks.

Song also has a habit of having people say the theme. Lucy tells Harry what she is worth; Harry tells Lucy what he is worth; a client tells Lucy what everybody is worth. The first time it is bracing. By the fifth it is a lecture with better lighting. A subplot involving one of Lucy’s clients, Sophie (Zoë Winters), takes the film somewhere darker than the rest of it can carry. Winters is excellent, but her scenes sit in the film like a serious essay stapled to a comedy, and the comedy does not know how to pick up afterwards.

Here is what we felt. For an hour we leaned forward, amused and slightly stung, because Song is right about how people talk about each other now and has the nerve to write it down. Then, somewhere past the ninety-minute mark, the film asked us to be moved, and we found we were watching from a distance, admiring how tidily it had arranged its pieces. We wanted to be got at. We were not.

Past Lives trusted silence and a look across a bar to carry everything. Materialists trusts argument, which is what it does best, so when the romance arrives it feels like a concession. It runs 116 minutes and carries a 15. See it with someone you have disagreed with about money. You will have the disagreement again on the way home, and it will be livelier than the one on screen.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
15
Mixed
3
Negative
4

Most critics like Materialists, though not by much and not in agreement. The praise clusters on Celine Song’s writing, with reviewers repeatedly calling the dialogue witty and the dating-economy observations sharp, and on Dakota Johnson, whose lead performance is singled out across the positive reviews, some calling it her strongest work in years. Pascal and Evans are generally judged well cast.

The reservations cluster on the second half: several reviews find the resolution of the love triangle anticlimactic or pat, and a recurring complaint is that the characters read as ideas rather than people, leaving the film hedging between glossy romance and sober drama. The spread is wide. The June reviews run warmest; the British notices arriving in August are cooler on the whole. The Times is the sharpest dissenter, dismissing it as wearisome and miscast, and Sight and Sound and Vulture both find it bloodless, with thin characters and little chemistry between the leads.

Variety
9 June 2025 · Owen Gleiberman
85*

The review describes the film as a lavishly charming New York story of love, money, and dating that plays the rom-com straight. It singles out Celine Song's witty dialogue and Dakota Johnson's forceful, sharp performance.

Read the full review →
Empire
9 June 2025 · John Nugent
80*

The critic finds the film a razor-sharp yet hopeful look at the competitive marketplace of modern dating, with a romcom surface that conceals thoughtful substance. Song is praised for subverting expectations through witty dialogue and a primal, ancient view of love.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · James Mottram
80

This is a sexy, smartly written New York story that examines modern dating’s callous, algorithmic nature through a satisfying romantic triangle. Johnson leads with aplomb while Pascal and Evans are expertly cast as fundamentally decent men.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 June 2025 · Amy Nicholson
75*

The critic calls it a smart and funny all-star love triangle with its own commitment issues. She singles out Dakota Johnson's performance as perfectly suited to the film's clear-eyed take on contemporary romance.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
14 August 2025
75*

The film thoughtfully examines whether money should matter in relationships and packs crisp insights about the dating economy, though sentiment is harder to find and it may not fully work as a romcom.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
9 June 2025
70*

Song’s follow-up uses a romantic triangle to explore the battle between head and heart with frankness, delivering a sharp look at modern love’s mix of fiscal security and soulmate pursuit. Narrative stumbles and pat resolutions in the second half prevent it from fully landing.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Materialists worth watching?
Materialists is worth watching for anyone who enjoys sharp talk about money and dating more than they need to be moved, and we scored it 63. Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans are well cast and the matchmaking scenes are the best thing in it. The romance arrives late and cold, and a darker subplot sits awkwardly in a comedy.
How long is Materialists, and what is it rated?
Materialists runs 1h 56m and is rated 14 by the CCC in Chile. It is a romance and drama film.
Where can I watch Materialists in Chile?
Materialists is streaming on HBO Max in Chile, and it is also available to buy from Amazon Prime Video from CLF 6.49. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Materialists, and is it suitable for children?
Materialists carries a UK 15 certificate and is a talky romantic drama, not a violent or frightening film. The 15 reflects adult language and adult subject matter, including a subplot involving one of Lucy's clients that turns darker than the rest of the film. It is not made for children and would bore most of them; older teenagers interested in the subject will be fine.
How does Materialists compare to Past Lives?
Materialists is louder and colder than Past Lives, and the earlier film is the better of the two. Past Lives trusts silence and a glance across a bar to carry its feeling; Materialists has its characters say the theme out loud, which is bracing at first and wearing by the end. Choose the first if you want to be moved, the second if you want an argument about money.
What should I watch after Materialists?
After Materialists, try Past Lives (2023, Fi1m 85): Song’s first film, quieter and surer, about the person you did not choose. Then Broadcast News (1987, Fi1m 84): A love triangle in which the clever woman knows exactly what everyone is worth; and The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91): Money, loneliness and a New York flat, with more feeling in one shot than most romances.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Past Lives (2023, Fi1m 85)Song’s first film, quieter and surer, about the person you did not choose.

  2. Broadcast News (1987, Fi1m 84)A love triangle in which the clever woman knows exactly what everyone is worth.

  3. The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91)Money, loneliness and a New York flat, with more feeling in one shot than most romances.

  4. The Worst Person in the World (2021, Fi1m 84)Oslo instead of Manhattan; a woman who cannot decide, and a film that forgives her.

  5. Metropolitan (1990, Fi1m 82)Whit Stillman’s rich young New Yorkers talk class all night and mean it.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever