Abigail Chase (Diane Kruger), Riley Poole (Justin Bartha), and Ben Gates (Nicolas Cage) explore a cave with flashlights
Film review

National Treasure: Book of Secrets

2007 · Directed by Jon Turteltaub · 2h 04m · RO 12

In a sentenceNicolas Cage has brought enough enthusiasm for several better puzzles

Ben Gates (Nicolas Cage) pursues a historical mystery alongside Abigail Chase (Diane Kruger) and Riley Poole (Justin Bartha). Puzzles and conspiracy theories complicate the search, while action interrupts the business of finding answers. Mitch Wilkinson (Ed Harris), Patrick Gates (Jon Voight) and Emily Appleton (Helen Mirren) also figure in the adventure. The people involved include Sadusky (Harvey Keitel), FBI Agent Spellman (Alicia Coppola) and The President (Bruce Greenwood). The hunt moves between locations as clues prompt further questions and the characters try to work out where the history leads.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Nicolas Cage and a willing supporting cast make this historical treasure hunt intermittently amusing. The weak puzzles and perfunctory character writing matter more as it goes on, despite the effort spent keeping everyone moving.

Jon Turteltaub approaches National Treasure: Book of Secrets as an adventure in which another clue should always be enough to keep us interested. For a while, the cheerful absurdity and a willing cast make that seem reasonable. It is intermittently funny, but too thin as a mystery and too repetitive as an adventure to recommend with much confidence. A treasure hunt needs to make finding the next answer feel worthwhile, and this one too often settles for getting there quickly.

Nicolas Cage supplies much of the entertainment as Ben Gates, particularly when his comic playing becomes excessive. We laughed at his overemphatic delivery, because the force he gives the material makes its absurdity harder to overlook. Justin Bartha provides a useful contrast as Riley Poole, getting some pleasure out of throwaway remarks without making each one an event. Between them, they suggest how much more enjoyable the film might have been if it had trusted its comedy a little further.

The screenplay by Cormac Wibberley and Marianne Wibberley keeps introducing complications without making the underlying puzzles especially rewarding. Implausibility is hardly disqualifying in this kind of adventure; the difficulty is that the answers seldom justify the attention demanded by the questions. The treatment of history is cursory, and the characters are too lightly written to give the search much emotional importance. Once the novelty wears off, there is little reason to care beyond the reasonable wish to discover what happens next.

The cinematography by John Schwartzman and Amir Mokri gives the changing locations an appealing polish, although the sightseeing becomes part of the problem. Dominic Watkins’s production design makes the historical surroundings persuasive enough for this sort of escapism. These departments do their work more convincingly than the script does its own. But an attractive destination cannot keep renewing our interest when the business conducted there feels so familiar, and the film asks its surroundings to do rather a lot.

Editors David Rennie and William Goldenberg maintain a brisk pace through material that could easily become laborious. That helps within individual stretches, though the cumulative effect is tiring: another complication needs processing before the previous one has proved particularly interesting. Trevor Rabin’s music is similarly determined to keep the adventure moving, with an insistence that becomes wearing. The film rarely seems short of energy, but it becomes increasingly difficult to share its enthusiasm for the next development.

Helen Mirren brings welcome comic assurance to Emily Appleton, while Ed Harris gives Mitch Wilkinson a seriousness the writing does not always support. Both are useful additions to an adventure that needs its actors to hold our attention through the weaker passages. Yet recognisable faces cannot make the character interactions feel less mechanical, and the supporting company gets too little worth playing. Their presence improves the experience without solving the reasons it begins to drag.

At 124 minutes, the film gives its modest pleasures more space than they can comfortably fill. Family adventure can accommodate unlikely history, broad acting and improbable escapes, provided the clues are satisfying or the company becomes dear to us. Here, the occasional laugh keeps that possibility alive longer than the plotting deserves. If working out the mystery is the attraction, choose something with better puzzles.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

41
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
8

Most critics find National Treasure: Book of Secrets a disappointing sequel, with familiar adventure machinery replacing much of the original’s charm. The praise centres on the cast’s comic contributions and, in the more sympathetic reviews, a pace brisk enough to carry the implausible plotting. Nicolas Cage’s broader moments, Helen Mirren’s comedy and Justin Bartha’s throwaway lines provide some relief, though enthusiasm for the characters is far from shared.

The main complaints concern repetitive plotting, uninteresting puzzles and action that grows forced or tiring. Critics differ over whether the silliness remains enjoyable: The AV Club finds it infectious and entertaining despite the length, while Digital Spy considers the convoluted story actively boring. Mirren’s presence also divides opinion, drawing appreciation for her comic contribution but objections to the role itself. The spread is wide, then, but the balance is firmly negative: only a minority find enough charm to excuse the formula.

The AV Club
20 December 2007 · B- · Nathan Rabin
70

Rabin finds the sequel goofy and entertaining, though overlong and tiring near the end. He especially praises Nicolas Cage’s hammy comic moments and the film’s infectious silliness.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review’s verdict cannot be determined from the accessible page. No praise or complaint from the critic is available to report.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
60

The review presents the sequel as an implausible but star-studded adventure. It singles out Helen Mirren for bringing comedy to the proceedings.

Read the full review →
Total Film
8 February 2008 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the sequel zippier and more entertaining than the original, though still preposterous, and calls it slick family-sized escapism. It praises the brisk pace for carrying the film past its plot holes and implausibilities.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 December 2007 · ★½/4 · Nick Schager
38

Schager finds the sequel a brisk but incoherent collection of cheap thrills. He faults its shallow characters and singles out Helen Mirren’s undignified role for particular complaint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 December 2007 · Kevin Crust
30*

Crust finds the sequel increasingly forced and says it wears out its welcome quickly. He singles out its repetitive formula and overblown escalation, while noting that Justin Bartha gets the best throwaway lines.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is National Treasure: Book of Secrets worth watching?
National Treasure: Book of Secrets offers occasional laughs and an enthusiastic Nicolas Cage, but we score it 52/100 because its weak puzzles make it hard to recommend. It may suit anyone content with cheerful historical absurdity and a willing cast; those hoping for a satisfying mystery are likely to find its 124 minutes tiring.
How long is National Treasure: Book of Secrets, and what is it rated?
National Treasure: Book of Secrets runs 2h 04m and is rated 12 by the RO in Romania. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch National Treasure: Book of Secrets in Romania?
National Treasure: Book of Secrets is streaming on Disney+ in Romania. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does National Treasure: Book of Secrets compare to Castle in the Sky?
National Treasure: Book of Secrets is the weaker treasure hunt beside Castle in the Sky, which we recommend for its clearer stakes and greater feeling for its adventurers. Cage’s broad comedy supplies intermittent amusement in the historical mystery, while the flying-island adventure offers a better-built story, despite a sagging middle and a thin villain.
What should I watch after National Treasure: Book of Secrets?
After National Treasure: Book of Secrets, try Castle in the Sky (1986, Fi1m 82): An airborne treasure hunt with clearer stakes and more feeling for its adventurers. Then The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77): The clues matter less than the chase, but the chase earns that indulgence.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Charade (1963) · not reviewed yetA lighter touch with conspiracy, romantic friction and people withholding useful information.

  2. The Last of Sheila (1973) · not reviewed yetA nastier puzzle holiday, with clues worth remembering and company worth suspecting.

  3. The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec (2010) · not reviewed yetHistorical adventure played with straight-faced absurdity and a welcome appetite for nonsense.

  4. Castle in the Sky (1986, Fi1m 82)An airborne treasure hunt with clearer stakes and more feeling for its adventurers.

  5. The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77)The clues matter less than the chase, but the chase earns that indulgence.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever