Women in bikinis pose together outside a sorority house
Film review

Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising

2016 · Directed by Nicholas Stoller · 1h 32m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe sorority gets the house and the speeches; Zac Efron, oiled and lost, gets the laughs

Mac and Kelly Radner (Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne) have a toddler, a second child on the way and a buyer for their house, with thirty days to go before the sale is final. The house next door, where the fraternity used to be, has stood empty since Teddy Sanders (Zac Efron) and his brothers graduated. Across campus, first-year Shelby (Chloë Grace Moretz) walks out of a fraternity party in disgust, learns that American sororities are not allowed to throw their own, and with Beth (Kiersey Clemons) and Nora (Beanie Feldstein) founds one that will. They need a house. Teddy, with no job and nowhere to live after his friend Pete (Dave Franco) gets engaged, offers to show them how it is done. The Radners have thirty days to keep the street quiet.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Nicholas Stoller swaps the fraternity for a sorority and keeps most of the jokes for the men. The result is amiable, scrappy and funny in patches, with a case about sisterhood it states clearly and then forgets. Zac Efron is the reason to bother.

Nicholas Stoller’s sequel to Neighbors (2014), released in British cinemas as Bad Neighbours 2 on 6 May 2016, turns the fraternity next door into a sorority and asks whether the same jokes work with the sexes swapped. Mostly they do, and that is the trouble: the film is at its best when it is doing what the first one did, and least sure of itself when it is doing the thing it is proudest of. Mac and Kelly Radner (Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne) are thirty days from selling their house; Shelby (Chloë Grace Moretz) and her friends move in next door with a keg and a point to make. It is likeable, loose and often funny, and about a third of it is a lecture nobody finished writing.

Zac Efron is the reason to see it. Teddy Sanders has graduated, lost his best friend Pete (Dave Franco) to an engagement, and found that the world has no use for a man whose only qualification is his stomach. Efron plays him with a sweetness that is almost alarming, a big handsome boy who agrees with whatever was said last, and the one scene we have kept is a quiet one at the girls’ kitchen table, where Teddy explains, without self-pity, that he would like to be useful to somebody. We laughed at him for most of the running time and somewhere in the middle noticed the laugh had gone soft and sad. The script did not arrange that. Efron did.

The sorority is the problem. Shelby, Beth (Kiersey Clemons) and Nora (Beanie Feldstein) arrive with a case: in America a sorority may not throw its own parties, so the only parties on campus are the fraternities’, and anyone who has been to one knows why that is a bad deal. The film says this clearly and early, and then gives the three of them one personality between them. Moretz is game and loud; Feldstein gets the most from the least, a wide-eyed delivery that makes ordinary lines land; Clemons is barely written at all. They get the speeches. Rogen and Ike Barinholtz get the jokes. Byrne, who was the first film’s secret weapon, is again the best comic performer on screen, making Kelly’s panic funnier every time it comes round, and the film keeps cutting away from her to a man explaining something.

It looks like what it is. Brandon Trost lights the Radner house flat and bright, like a sitcom, and the parties in strobes and coloured smoke, and the two never feel like the same street. Theresa Guleserian turns the fraternity’s wreck of a house into a sorority’s with fairy lights and a mural, and the before-and-after is one of the few jokes told with pictures rather than words.

Several of the set pieces are the first film’s with the numbers changed. The airbags come back. The dean (Lisa Kudrow) comes back for a scene. Selena Gomez has about four lines as the president of the established sorority, Phi Lamda, and is gone. There is one scene in the middle, at a tailgate, in which Teddy, oiled to a shine and nearly undressed, holds a crowd’s attention for a purpose we will leave to the film, and we laughed hard and then felt a little cheap, because the film had spent the previous ten minutes telling us off for looking at people that way. We do not think it noticed the contradiction.

Stoller made Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008), which understood that the funniest thing in a comedy is a person in pain who will not admit it, and the Teddy scenes are the only ones here that remember that. The first Neighbors had a clean idea, a couple who thought they were still young finding out they were not, and ran it for the whole length. This one has that idea, a second idea about women, and a running worry about whether the Radners are fit parents, and gets about halfway through each.

Worth an evening if you liked the first and are happy to hear the same jokes from the other side of the fence; not worth it for the sisterhood, which the title promises and the script has misplaced by the halfway mark. It runs 92 minutes and carries a 15.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
9
Mixed
6
Negative
5
IndieWire
17 May 2016 · A- · David Ehrlich
90

Ehrlich calls the sequel one of the greatest comedy sequels and praises its warm, humane humor. He especially singles out Zac Efron’s performance, while noting that the sorority sisters are less well-defined than the original’s supporting characters.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 May 2016 · B · Jesse Hassenger
77

Hassenger finds the film funny and empathetic, though less conceptually sharp than its predecessor. He singles out Zac Efron’s unexpectedly nuanced, touching performance as its standout.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 May 2016 · Rebecca Keegan
70*

Keegan finds the comedy goofy and overcrowded but unexpectedly witty and poignant. She especially praises Zac Efron’s vulnerable performance and his comic use of his physicality.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
70*

The critic finds the sequel more engaging than its predecessor, though its set pieces can be merely frantic. They single out its self-awareness and political themes as strengths.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 May 2016 · Guy Lodge
65*

Lodge finds the sequel messy but lively, with its feminist angle adding a timely, if uneven, perspective. He particularly praises Zac Efron’s touching, deadpan portrayal of a former fratboy struggling to find his place.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint could be verified.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising worth watching?
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising is worth an evening only if you liked the first film and will take the same jokes from the other side of the fence; we scored it 58. Zac Efron, playing a graduate with nothing to offer but his stomach, is the reason to bother. The case about sisterhood is stated early and then mislaid.
How long is Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising, and what is it rated?
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising runs 1h 32m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy film.
Where can I watch Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising in the US?
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising is streaming on Netflix in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising, and is it suitable for children?
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising carries a 15 certificate in the UK and an R in the United States, so it is not for children. There is no violence or fear to speak of; the certificate is for crude sex comedy, drink and drugs, and a good deal of language. Older teenagers who saw the first will know what they are in for.
How does Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising compare to Neighbors?
Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising is the looser and less certain of the two; Neighbors had one clean idea, new parents finding out they are no longer young, and ran it the whole way. The sequel keeps the airbags and most of the set pieces but splits itself between three ideas and finishes none. See the first film first; Efron is the sequel's one real gain.
What should I watch after Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising?
After Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising, try Neighbors (2014, Fi1m 70): The first go, with a cleaner idea and the same airbags. Then Booksmart (2019, Fi1m 81): The girls’ campus comedy this one keeps promising, with the girls written in; and Bridesmaids (2011, Fi1m 82): Rose Byrne being coolly awful; Kristen Wiig falling apart on a plane.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Neighbors (2014, Fi1m 70)The first go, with a cleaner idea and the same airbags.

  2. Booksmart (2019, Fi1m 81)The girls’ campus comedy this one keeps promising, with the girls written in.

  3. Bridesmaids (2011, Fi1m 82)Rose Byrne being coolly awful; Kristen Wiig falling apart on a plane.

  4. National Lampoon's Animal House (1978) · not reviewed yetThe fraternity film every fraternity film is still quoting.

  5. The Inbetweeners Movie (2011) · not reviewed yetThe British version of boys who should know better, cheaper and crueller.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever