Teddy points toward Mac and Kelly outside their neighboring houses
Film review

Neighbors

2014 · Directed by Nicholas Stoller · 1h 37m · RTC B-15

In a sentenceA turf war between two sets of children, one of which has a mortgage

Mac Radner (Seth Rogen) and his wife Kelly (Rose Byrne) have a new baby, Stella (Elise Vargas), a mortgage and a quiet suburban house they have put everything into. Then a fraternity buys the place next door. Its president, Teddy Sanders (Zac Efron), and his second-in-command, Pete Regazolli (Dave Franco), are all charm on the doorstep and promise to keep the noise down, and the Radners, anxious not to seem old, go to the first party and stay until dawn. On the second night, with the baby awake and the walls shaking, Mac calls the police instead of calling Teddy first, as he swore he would. The fraternity takes this as a declaration of war, and the Radners, egged on by Mac’s colleague Jimmy (Ike Barinholtz), decide to fight back.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Nicholas Stoller’s comedy about new parents at war with the fraternity next door is loud, crude and funnier than it has any right to be, mostly because Rose Byrne refuses to play the disapproving wife. The story under the gags is thin, and the film knows it.

The premise of Neighbors fits on a beer mat. A couple in their thirties with a baby move next door to a fraternity, ask nicely for quiet, and are ignored; hostilities follow. Nicholas Stoller, directing a script by Andrew J. Cohen and Brendan O’Brien, has no interest in pretending this is more than it is. What he has made instead is a 97-minute escalation of pranks with a few honest observations about getting older tucked in among the jokes about male anatomy. It is uneven and it is often stupid, and we laughed a great deal more than we expected to.

The reason is Rose Byrne. The wife in this kind of film is usually the brake, the person who says no so that the husband can say yes and the plot can happen. Byrne’s Kelly is the accelerator. She is the one who wants to go to the party, the one who proposes the nastier schemes, and the one who carries out the cruellest of them with a bright, reasonable smile while Mac stands beside her looking worried. Byrne plays every line as if it were the obvious thing to say, which is the only way this material works, and she gets the biggest laughs in the film without once raising her voice.

Zac Efron is the other surprise. Teddy Sanders is the fraternity’s president and its poster, and Efron plays him with a vanity so complete it becomes touching: he knows exactly how he looks, he knows it is the only thing he has, and he is starting to suspect it will not last past graduation. Dave Franco’s Pete is the clever one, the boy with the job offer, and the film is quietly sharp about what happens to a friendship when one of you has a future and the other has a house. Julie Berghoff dresses that house so that by day it is a wreck of red cups and sagging sofas and by night, under Brandon Trost’s strobes and coloured lamps, it turns into something like a nightclub, a different building entirely. The joke is that the Radners’ house, twenty feet away, is lit like a nursery.

The trouble is everything between the set pieces. Stoller lets his cast riff, and Zene Baker cuts around the riffing so that scenes end where the laughs run out rather than where the scene does. Some exchanges, particularly between Rogen and Ike Barinholtz’s Jimmy, go on a full minute past the point where anyone said anything funny. Lisa Kudrow’s dean, Carol Gladstone, exists to give the war a scoreboard and does little else. Christopher Mintz-Plasse and Jerrod Carmichael are each given one joke and asked to make it last. Michael Andrews’s score is barely audible; the film is scored, in effect, by the parties, which is fair enough, but it means the quieter scenes have nothing under them.

Here is what got us. There is a running gag involving car airbags whose punchlines the trailer had already handed over, and we sat waiting for it with our arms folded, and it worked anyway, twice, loudly, in a full cinema. The timing is the whole trick: Baker holds the shot a beat longer than seems wise each time, so that the payoff arrives when we had stopped bracing for it. We also felt, somewhere in the last half hour, a small unexpected sadness for Teddy, watching Efron’s face as it dawns on him that the party is the only thing he is good at. The film does not linger on it. It goes straight back to the fireworks.

Stoller’s Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008) had a similar looseness and a much stronger spine, a man trying to get over a woman, and every gag hung from it. Neighbors has a house and a grievance, and the grievance changes shape whenever the writers need a new prank. Against the fraternity films it is descended from, most obviously Animal House (1978), it is at least honest about the Radners: they are not the grown-ups here, they are the same people as the boys next door with worse hangovers and a baby monitor.

It is a film for a drink and for company that will not mind laughing at things nobody would admit to laughing at afterwards. It is not one for parents, or for children, or for anyone who has ever sat on a university disciplinary board. It runs 97 minutes and carries a 15, and both feel about right.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
10
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics find Neighbors funny: ten of the sixteen reviews are positive, and even the mixed ones concede a decent ratio of laughs. The praise clusters on the cast rather than the writing. Rose Byrne is named more often than anyone, several reviews calling her the film’s secret asset for the way her timing keeps the outrageous material grounded. Zac Efron’s deadpan is the other recurring pleasure, along with the escalating party set pieces.

The reservations are about shape: a story that never quite arrives, uneven gags, and a reliance on shouty improvisation that some find tiresome. Slant objects that the rivalry is doggedly male-centred and Byrne is pushed into the background, an odd counterpoint to the reviews that put her front and centre. The spread is wide, from raves calling it a reinvention of the studio comedy to The Guardian, where Mark Kermode finds it aimless and notes that the trailer has already given away its best slapstick punchlines.

The Hollywood Reporter
8 March 2014 · festival review · THR Staff
80*

The critic finds the comedy very funny and steadily escalating, calling it a major win for its screenwriters. Rose Byrne earns special praise for her devious, scene-stealing performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
28 April 2014 · ★★★★ · Ashley Clark
80

The 4/5 rating indicates a positive verdict. The available page text does not reveal a specific point of praise or criticism.

Read the full review →
Total Film
3 May 2014 · ★★★★ · Matt Glasby
80

Glasby finds the comedy consistently funny and praises its charm and set-piece gags, despite its rushed pacing and gender issues. He singles out Zac Efron’s casting and Dave Franco’s comic performance, while noting the film’s humour often outweighs its subtlety.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 May 2014 · Betsy Sharkey
75*

Sharkey finds the raunchy comedy successful, praising its mix of crude laughs with sweetness and intelligence. She singles out the believable relationship dialogue and the sensitivity woven into the story.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 March 2014 · festival review · Andrew Barker
72*

Barker finds the comedy an outrageous, winningly stupid riot despite its incoherent story and uneven gags. He particularly praises Zac Efron’s surprisingly intriguing performance and the reflection between Efron’s and Seth Rogen’s characters.

Read the full review →
Vulture
8 May 2014 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Ebiri finds Neighbors very funny, though somewhat confused and uneven. He praises Zac Efron’s deadpan performance and the party scenes’ feverish energy, while finding some improvised exchanges clunky.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Neighbors worth watching?
Neighbors is worth watching for anyone who wants a loud, crude comedy with company and a drink, and we scored it 70. Rose Byrne and Zac Efron are the reasons to stay: she plays the wife as the one proposing the nastier schemes, and he makes the fraternity president's vanity oddly touching. The scenes between the pranks sag, and the story is thin.
How long is Neighbors, and what is it rated?
Neighbors runs 1h 37m and is rated B-15 by the RTC in Mexico. It is a comedy film.
Where can I watch Neighbors in Mexico?
Neighbors is streaming on Netflix in Mexico, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from MX$50.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Neighbors, and is it suitable for children?
Neighbors is a 15 in the UK and R in the US, and it is not for children. The comedy is crude rather than frightening: constant swearing, drink and drugs at the parties, and a stream of jokes about male anatomy, with pranks that escalate into deliberate cruelty. Nothing in it is meant to scare; the question is whether you mind laughing at things nobody admits to afterwards.
How does Neighbors compare to Bridesmaids?
Neighbors and Bridesmaids both let a strong cast riff past the point where the laughs run out, and both have Rose Byrne as a woman you expect to dislike and cannot. Bridesmaids is the fuller film: Kristen Wiig gives it a spine about friendship that the fraternity war never has. Neighbors is shorter, ruder and more purely a run of set pieces.
What should I watch after Neighbors?
After Neighbors, try Bridesmaids (2011, Fi1m 82): Rose Byrne as the woman you are meant to hate, and cannot quite. Then Booksmart (2019, Fi1m 81): One night of parties, two clever girls, and the jokes land more often.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008) · not on Fi1m yetStoller’s earlier film, with a better spine and the same taste for embarrassment.

  2. Bridesmaids (2011, Fi1m 82)Rose Byrne as the woman you are meant to hate, and cannot quite.

  3. Animal House (1978) · not on Fi1m yetThe fraternity comedy every other fraternity comedy is still arguing with.

  4. The Inbetweeners Movie (2011) · not on Fi1m yetBritish boys on holiday, behaving no better and with far less money.

  5. Booksmart (2019, Fi1m 81)One night of parties, two clever girls, and the jokes land more often.

Neighbors (2014) review: loud, crude and funnier than expected (Mexico) | Fi1m