Film review

Salesman

1969 · Directed by David Maysles, Albert Maysles, Charlotte Zwerin · 1h 30m · MPA G

In a sentenceFour men in wet overcoats selling God on easy terms to people who can barely afford the milk

Documentary

Boston, in winter. Four men sell large illustrated Bibles door to door, on instalments: Paul Brennan, known as ‘The Badger’; Charles McDevitt, ‘The Gipper’; James Baker, ‘The Rabbit’; and Raymond Martos, ‘The Bull’. Their leads come from the local parishes, and their customers are housewives, widows and shift workers in small Catholic homes who do not want to say no to a Bible. By day the men knock; by night they tally sales in shared motel rooms. Brennan, once the best of them, has started losing his touch. A sales meeting in Chicago, where the men are told from a platform that the Bible is a product like any other, sends the four south to Florida for fresh territory.

Fi1m review

The Maysles brothers and Charlotte Zwerin follow four Bible salesmen from Boston kitchens to Florida motels and never tell you what to think. The best film we know about selling, and one of the saddest; the camera is not quite as invisible as it pretends.

Albert and David Maysles, with Charlotte Zwerin sharing the directing and the editing, made a film with no narrator, no interviews, no score and no argument they were prepared to say out loud. Its subject is four men who sell Bibles door to door. Its method is to follow them and keep quiet. It is 90 minutes long and it wastes none of them. More than fifty years on, it is still the best film we know about the job of selling, and one of the saddest films about work we have seen.

The product is a large illustrated Bible, payable in instalments, and the men have an answer for every reason a household might have for not wanting one. Their leads come from the parish; they arrive on the doorstep already knowing the name of the priest. Paul Brennan, called ‘The Badger’, has the best patter and the worst luck. Early on, in a Boston kitchen, a woman keeps trying to say no and is talked past every time, and we were embarrassed for her, then for him, then for ourselves, because we had been laughing. Nothing in the framing tells us how to take it. Albert Maysles simply stays in the corner of the kitchen with his camera and waits.

That camera is the film’s real instrument. Maysles shoots handheld, in black and white, in whatever light there is, and he has a habit of finding the face that is not talking: the husband in the doorway, the child under the table. The sound is as rough as the picture. Televisions mutter next door, traffic passes, a kettle goes, and none of it is cleaned up. You feel you have been let into strangers’ houses on a wet weeknight, which is where these men spend their lives.

The shape belongs to the editors. David Maysles and Zwerin cut the footage into something close to a story: Boston in winter, then a sales meeting in Chicago, where the men are told from a platform that the Bible is a product with a market like any other, then Florida, where they are sent for fresh territory and find the doors no easier. There is a scene of Brennan in the car between calls, singing to himself, and the editors let it run long enough to stop being funny. The plot, such as it is, is Brennan’s slow slide, and they build it from glances and sales totals rather than from anything anyone says about it.

Brennan is the reason the film is remembered. In the motel at night he is a storyteller, doing accents and needling the others; on the doorstep he is a different man, one who can hear that the words that used to work have stopped working. Watching him try to close a sale is like watching someone try to start a car in the cold. Charles McDevitt (‘The Gipper’), James Baker (‘The Rabbit’) and Raymond Martos (‘The Bull’) are drawn more thinly. The nicknames promise four characters and the film delivers one and a half. Baker closes sales with an ease the film never explains, and we would have liked ten more minutes with him.

The method has limits, and the film does not always admit them. People know the camera is there. Some of the customers are plainly performing their own decency for it, and one or two of the motel confessions have the polish of things said before. The Chicago speech is cut to be damning, and it is, but a film that claims only to watch has here decided what we should see. The Florida stretch, pitch after pitch in the same kinds of front rooms, sags for ten minutes before it finds its footing.

Set against the Maysles’ later films, the festival of Gimme Shelter (1970) and the two women of Grey Gardens (1975), this is the plainest and the most controlled. Nothing here is dramatic except what the men carry to the door. It is not a comfortable evening. Watch it with the curtains drawn, and if the bell goes halfway through, do not answer it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics admire the Maysles brothers’ film, and the praise clusters on its direct cinema method: no narration, fly-on-the-wall observation of four Bible salesmen, and long stretches of their patter as they pitch to customers who plainly cannot afford the product. Paul Brennan, known as The Badger, is singled out again and again as the film’s centre, a tragicomic figure whose mounting anxiety and eventual defeat carry the picture. Several reviews read it as a portrait of American capitalism and the selling of faith, with the salesmen cast as both predators and prey.

The spread is narrow. The one mixed notice comes from The New Yorker, whose critic questions whether the technique can fully reveal human nuance and finds it awkward in places, while crediting the filmmakers with charity towards their subjects. The New York Times is warm but measured, treating the film as a social document rather than a drama. Later reviews are more enthusiastic, and more than one argues it has grown in stature.

Empire
12 February 2007 · David Parkinson
90*

The Maysles brothers’ 1969 documentary is one of the masterworks of Direct Cinema, following four Bible salesmen with no narration and harrowing scenes of their quota-chasing tactics. It lays bare the cynical soul of US capitalism and exploitative religion, showing desperate opportunists tormented by failure in cheap motels.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 March 2020 · Chuck Bowen
90*

The critic lauds the film's immersive direct cinema style that captures the salesmen's naturalistic interactions and the wrenching double-awareness of their pitches to struggling customers. It singles out Paul Brennan's volatile, artistic soul and the film's devastating final image as encapsulating the nightmares of failure in American capitalism.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
5 November 2008
90*

The critic praises Salesman as a 1968 masterpiece of direct cinema and a truly Millerian experience, superior to stage adaptations of Death of a Salesman. The film stands out for its fly-on-the-wall observation of four Bible salesmen, capturing unselfconscious moments and the failure of grand dreams with compassion and empathy.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 April 2002 · Nathan Rabin
80*

The critic highlights the film's exploration of four Bible salesmen as both predators and prey in a system that exploits faith for profit, noting their paradoxical lives of desperation and fantasy. Paul Brennan emerges as a particularly memorable tragicomic figure whose escalating anxiety drives the film's depth and pathos.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 April 1969 · Vincent Canby
70*

Canby calls the film a fine, pure picture of a small section of American life and one of the best examples of cinéma vérité or direct cinema. He praises its value as a social document and sometimes funny footnote to contemporary history, centering on the personal defeat of salesman Paul Brennan.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 April 1969 · Penelope Gilliatt
50*

Gilliatt describes the salesmen's craven tactics and the film's capture of their desperation and the awkwardness of direct cinema, while noting some genuinely funny and dignified moments at the sales convention. She questions the technique's ability to fully reveal human nuance but credits the Maysles brothers with trust and charity in portraying American nomadism and sales pressure.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…

Glengarry Glen Ross poster86

Glengarry Glen Ross

1992 · The same job with better suits and worse language; Lemmon’s Levene is Brennan with a script.

Grey Gardens poster

Grey Gardens

1975 · The Maysles again, this time invited in and never quite asked to leave.

Chronicle of a Summer poster86

Chronicle of a Summer

1961 · Paris, a microphone and one question, are you happy; where this way of filming began.

Sorry We Missed You poster

Sorry We Missed You

2019 · Loach on the delivery van; the quota has changed its name and nothing else.

Death of a Salesman poster

Death of a Salesman

1985 · Hoffman’s Willy Loman, for anyone who wants to see the same man written down.