Film review

The Bridges of Madison County

1995 · Directed by Clint Eastwood · 2h 15m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceStreep and Eastwood flirt over flowers, and we are suddenly far too invested in two strangers

DramaRomance

Francesca Johnson (Meryl Streep) and Robert Kincaid (Clint Eastwood) encounter a love that comes later in life. Their attraction raises questions about beginning a relationship when both people already have lives of their own, and about what they might be prepared to change. Eastwood also directs this romantic drama, with Richard LaGravenese adapting Robert James Waller’s novel. Annie Corley plays Caroline Johnson, Victor Slezak plays Michael Johnson and Jim Haynie plays Richard Johnson. The story centres on Francesca and Robert as their feelings become harder to ignore and the possibility of a different life comes into view.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Clint Eastwood’s patient romance gives Meryl Streep room to make desire funny, awkward and moving. We recommend it warmly, with a caveat about the stretches where restraint becomes a little too polite.

The Bridges of Madison County is a moving adult romance that becomes a little too polite for its own good. Clint Eastwood directs as though getting to know someone deserves our full attention, and Meryl Streep makes that confidence seem sensible. The attraction matters because neither performer treats it as a foregone conclusion. There is humour, embarrassment and room for a response to arrive a little late. Eastwood allows the courtship to take its time.

Streep’s Francesca Johnson is the reason to stay attentive. She makes desire look like something Francesca has to recognise in herself before she can quite admit it to anyone else. We see her assessing Robert, but also assessing the person she becomes around him. Eastwood, playing Robert Kincaid, is an attentive partner, and his restraint leaves space for Streep’s changes of mood. The pleasure is in watching two adults hesitate, test a remark and discover whether the other person will meet them halfway.

The flower prank is a useful measure of why the pairing works. We laughed, then felt unexpectedly tender towards them, because the silliness lets both people put down the effort of being impressive. Eastwood has the sense to let the joke count as part of the courtship. It makes the attraction easier to believe than a solemn account of what these two mean to each other could have done.

Jack N. Green’s cinematography gives the faces enough attention that the film’s handsome appearance never becomes its chief attraction. There is pleasure in looking at this romance, but Streep is doing too much for prettiness to be the point. Jeannine Oppewall’s production design belongs to the same carefully judged approach, never demanding that we admire the surroundings at the expense of the people. Both contributions work because they leave us free to notice the performances.

Editor Joel Cox allows the exchanges to find their own pace, including the small delays that make flirtation both funny and exposing. That patience is essential, though at 135 minutes we occasionally wanted a conversation to move on sooner. Lennie Niehaus’s music is sympathetic to the performances, but there are moments when its encouragement towards feeling seems unnecessary. Streep can make us understand that something matters without assistance. The film is most persuasive when the direction, cutting and music accept how much she is already giving them.

Richard LaGravenese’s screenplay, adapted from Robert James Waller’s novel, is largely content to let the relationship develop through conversation and behaviour. The sentiment is plain enough; the welcome surprise is the amount of ordinary humour allowed alongside it. When the writing becomes more reverent about the romance, we miss the looseness of the teasing. Eastwood is better at directing an uncertain exchange between two people than at asking us to stand back and appreciate how deeply they feel.

Anyone weary of romantic dramas that rush from introductions to declarations will find something to enjoy here. Eastwood lets desire be awkward without making age itself the joke, and Streep never seems content merely to be adored. Those qualities make the occasional over-careful stretch worth accepting. Give it an unhurried evening, and resist the temptation to fill its pauses with conversation.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
80*

The film is a handsomely crafted romantic tearjerker that affirms there is a sex life after the bloom is off the bod, making it the class weepy of the year for older audiences. Eastwood's slow-burn direction and the abundant chemistry between Streep and Eastwood are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 December 2011 · GA
80*

Immaculately performed and assembled with wit and sensitivity, this is one of the most satisfying weepies in years. Eastwood's clean, pared direction and the mostly no-frills script ensure the film avoids sentimentality.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
2 June 1995 · Kenneth Turan

Eastwood and LaGravenese craft a serviceable adaptation by emphasizing visual storytelling over the book's excesses; Streep gives an exceptional performance that anchors the romance, though the film is overly genteel and slow-paced at times.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 June 1995 · Janet Maslin

Eastwood transforms the mawkish source material into a moving, elegiac love story with surprising decency and leanness; Streep delivers one of her best performances as the yearning farm wife.

Read the full review →
Variety
17 May 1995 · Todd McCarthy

Eastwood and company turn the treacly novel into a handsomely crafted, beautifully acted adult love story with intelligent restraint; Streep is especially radiant and earthy, though the material's sentimental core remains a limitation.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1996

Nominated
Best Actress

If you liked this, try…

Brief Encounter poster90

Brief Encounter

1945 · Another romance that takes everyday obligations as seriously as desire.

In the Mood for Love poster

In the Mood for Love

2000 · For glances, hesitation and the painful work of keeping up appearances.

Ali: Fear Eats the Soul poster

Ali: Fear Eats the Soul

1974 · An older woman’s romance, with far less protection from other people’s judgement.

A Man and a Woman poster

A Man and a Woman

1966 · Adult attraction given time, helped by two leads worth watching closely.

45 Years poster

45 Years

2015 · For the unease that arrives when a settled relationship faces its history.