Chef Slowik (Ralph Fiennes) presents a dish at the restaurant counter
Film review

The Menu

2022 · Directed by Mark Mylod · 1h 47m · MPA R

In a sentenceRalph Fiennes claps once and a room full of rich people stops chewing

Margot (Anya Taylor-Joy) and Tyler (Nicholas Hoult) take a small boat to a private island for dinner at the restaurant of the celebrated Chef Slowik (Ralph Fiennes). Tyler has waited months for the booking and knows every course by heart; Margot is a last-minute replacement who would rather be anywhere else. Elsa (Hong Chau), the maître d’, seats the guests: a food critic, Lillian (Janet McTeer), and her editor Ted (Paul Adelstein), three braying young men on company money (Rob Yang, Arturo Castro), a fading film star (John Leguizamo), an elderly couple (Reed Birney, Judith Light). Slowik claps once, the kitchen answers in one voice, and the courses begin.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Mark Mylod’s horror comedy about a tasting menu gone wrong is sharply cast, often funny and never dull, and it has one point to make about rich diners and their chef, which it makes and then makes again. Fiennes and Hong Chau are worth the trip.

A small boatload of rich people pay a great deal of money to be ferried to an island, seated in a dining room with a view of the sea, and fed by a chef who has stopped enjoying his work. That is the whole of The Menu, and Mark Mylod, working from a script by Seth Reiss and Will Tracy, gets a sharp and funny hour out of it before the film starts repeating itself. It is well cast, well built and about the right length for one idea told twice.

Ralph Fiennes plays Chef Slowik as a man who has been applauded for so long that he has gone deaf to it. He introduces each course with a single clap, the kitchen answers in one voice, and then he talks, quietly and at length, about what is on the plate and why it is there, in the tone of a magistrate reading out sentence. It is a patient, closed, unnerving performance, and the film’s best scenes are the ones where he stands at the pass and looks at the dining room. Hong Chau’s Elsa, the maître d’, is nearly as good: polite, immovable, and plainly on the chef’s side rather than the guests’. Her welcome speech sounds like hospitality the first time and like a warning the second.

Ethan Tobman builds the restaurant as one long timber room with the kitchen open at the end of it, so the diners can see the staff and the staff can see the diners and nobody can see a way out. Peter Deming shoots the courses from directly above, each plate alone under a title card giving the name and the ingredients, the way the cookery programmes do, and Christopher Tellefsen cuts the film to that rhythm, course by course, so the evening keeps a shape even when the plot loses one. Colin Stetson’s score is mostly low reeds and breath, closer to something inhaled than played, and it does the quiet dread the dialogue is too busy for.

Nicholas Hoult’s Tyler is the most precisely observed thing in the film: a fan who photographs every plate, corrects his date on the name of a technique, and would rather be humiliated by the chef than ignored by him. We laughed at him often, and then felt slightly sorry for him, which is more than the script bothers to feel. Anya Taylor-Joy plays Margot as the only diner not performing, watching the others the way we are, and the film’s tension lives in whether anybody has noticed. Janet McTeer, as the critic Lillian, is a good sketch of a woman who has praised too many restaurants. John Leguizamo’s film star gets one good line and spends the rest of the evening looking for another.

The trouble is that once the evening turns, at a course the menu calls The Mess, the film has only one thing to say and keeps saying it. The guests are each guilty of something and each will be told what. The chef is guilty too, of having made beautiful food for people who did not deserve it. Reiss and Tracy take turns despising the diners and despising the man who serves them, and by the later courses the speeches have replaced the jokes. The Mess itself made us flinch, properly, in the dark. Forty minutes on we found we no longer cared which table the next blow landed on, and were waiting instead to be told what it all meant. We were told.

The dinner party that turns on its guests is an old form. Buñuel’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972) never let its diners reach the food and said more about them in the trying than this manages in a full tasting menu. The Menu is closer to a good first draft of a stage play, with the set and the cast in place and the second act still to be argued over.

Go for Fiennes, who gives the chef a sadness the writing never quite earns, and for the first hour, which is as funny about fine dining as anything we have seen. Eat beforehand. The food looks marvellous and nobody on screen gets to enjoy it, and after a while neither did we. It runs 107 minutes and carries a 15.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
16
Mixed
11
Negative
2
Variety
16 September 2022 · Critics Pick · Owen Gleiberman
85*

Gleiberman finds the film a hilariously sharp thriller and satire of high-end foodie culture. He praises the performances of Ralph Fiennes and Anya Taylor-Joy, as well as the director’s elegant, ice-cold staging.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 November 2022 · B+ · Tomris Laffly
83

Laffly finds the film fiendishly delightful, an entertaining and familiar eat-the-rich satire. She praises its sharply observed dining-room comedy and Peter Deming’s cinematography, which heightens the class tension.

Read the full review →
Vulture
18 November 2022 · Alison Willmore
80*

Willmore finds the film a satisfying, darkly funny satire that avoids glibness and leaves viewers feeling trapped in its doomed setup. She singles out Ralph Fiennes’s performance and the film’s sympathy for the kitchen staff as especially effective.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 November 2022 · Katie Walsh
78*

Walsh finds the film a satisfying, darkly humorous satire of artists and the forces that consume their work. She praises the flawless acting, crisp cinematography and unsettling score, while noting the ending may jump the shark.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 September 2022 · B · Christian Blauvelt
77

The critic finds the film gripping and attentive to genre, though its characters and broader indictment feel underdeveloped. Anya Taylor-Joy’s arresting, multidimensional performance stands out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 September 2022 · B · Benjamin Lee
77

Lee calls the film a fun but ultimately undercooked satire, whose mystery loses force as it unfolds. He praises the performances, especially Hong Chau’s, and the sharply observed absurdities of fine dining.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Menu worth watching?
The Menu is worth watching for Ralph Fiennes, Hong Chau and a first hour that is as funny about fine dining as anything we have seen, and we scored it 72. It has one point to make about rich diners and their chef, and it makes that point and then makes it again, so the later courses lose some of the bite of the early ones.
How long is The Menu, and what is it rated?
The Menu runs 1h 47m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and horror film.
Where can I watch The Menu in the US?
The Menu is streaming on Hulu, Netflix and Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves Hulu on 1 November. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Menu, and is it suitable for children?
The Menu carries a 15 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is not for children. It is a horror comedy, and once the evening turns there is violence; one course made us flinch properly in the dark. Teenagers who can take a nasty turn after a funny hour will be fine, but the squeamish should know the dinner does not stay polite.
How does The Menu compare to The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie?
The Menu is the louder and more violent of the two, and The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie is the better film. Buñuel never lets his diners reach the food and says more about them in the waiting than Mylod manages across a full tasting menu. Go to The Menu for Fiennes and the jokes; go to Buñuel for the sharper, drier comedy about the same sort of people.
What should I watch after The Menu?
After The Menu, try The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972, Fi1m 83): Buñuel’s diners never reach the meal; the waiting says everything this film shouts. Then Boiling Point (2021, Fi1m 77): One restaurant, one night, one take, and nobody has time to make a speech; and Triangle of Sadness (2022, Fi1m 66): Östlund’s yacht dinner goes wrong in ways The Menu only threatens.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972, Fi1m 83)Buñuel’s diners never reach the meal; the waiting says everything this film shouts.

  2. Ready or Not (2019) · not reviewed yetA rich family, a locked house and a bride who refuses to play along.

  3. Boiling Point (2021, Fi1m 77)One restaurant, one night, one take, and nobody has time to make a speech.

  4. Triangle of Sadness (2022, Fi1m 66)Östlund’s yacht dinner goes wrong in ways The Menu only threatens.

  5. The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover (1989, Fi1m 78)Greenaway’s restaurant is a theatre of cruelty and the kitchen is the only refuge.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever