Max Walker (Jean-Claude Van Damme) kicks a man beside a red car at an auto show
Film review

Timecop

1994 · Directed by Peter Hyams · 1h 38m

In a sentenceVan Damme does the splits on a kitchen worktop to dodge a live wire, and it is the cleverest thing anyone in the film does

In 1863 a horseman carrying a weapon that will not be invented for a century robs a Confederate gold shipment. In Washington in 1994, time travel is new, Congress sets up the Time Enforcement Commission to police it, and police officer Max Walker (Jean-Claude Van Damme) is recruited the same week his wife Melissa (Mia Sara) is murdered at their home. Ten years on, Walker works for Commander Eugene Matuzak (Bruce McGill), chasing people who go back to get rich. A trip to the Wall Street crash of 1929 to arrest his old partner Atwood (Jason Schombing) points to Senator Aaron McComb (Ron Silver), who is running for president and paying for it with the past. Fielding (Gloria Reuben), from internal affairs, is assigned to ride along and watch him.

Fi1m review

Peter Hyams’s time-travel thriller is darker and better built than anything else we have seen with Van Damme’s name above the title, and Ron Silver gives it a proper villain. The plotting falls apart if you look; the trick is not to look.

Peter Hyams’s film opens in 1863, with a rider robbing a Confederate gold shipment using a pair of machine pistols nobody will manufacture for a hundred years, and it has the decency to explain itself quickly. Time travel has been invented. You can go backwards but not forwards, because the future has not happened yet. Congress has set up the Time Enforcement Commission to stop people using the past to get rich, and Washington police officer Max Walker (Jean-Claude Van Damme) is recruited the same week his wife Melissa (Mia Sara) is killed in their house. Mark Verheiden’s screenplay, from a story he wrote with Mike Richardson, then jumps ten years and gets on with it.

It is a better film than its star usually gets, and we mean that as a compliment to the film rather than a dig at the star. Hyams is his own cinematographer here, and he shoots it dark: rain on the windows, blue light down corridors, faces lit from one side. Steven Kemper cuts those fights so you can see who hit whom, which was not a given in 1994 and is rarer now.

Van Damme plays Walker as a widower first and a kickboxer second, and he is more watchable for it. He does not do much with his face, but he does not do much wrong with it either, and Hyams keeps the dialogue short enough that the accent, which the film never accounts for in a Washington policeman, stops mattering after ten minutes. The action is where he lives. There is a fight in his own kitchen, in the dark, that ends with him doing the splits across the worktop to keep his feet out of a puddle somebody has just dropped a live wire into.

Ron Silver is the reason to stay. Senator Aaron McComb is running for president and funding the campaign by sending men into the past to play the markets with tomorrow’s newspaper. Silver plays him with open contempt for everyone he meets, including the people he is paying, and he delivers the film’s best lines as if bored by how easy it all is. Bruce McGill’s Commander Eugene Matuzak does the shouting boss with more warmth than the part asks for. Gloria Reuben, as Fielding, the internal affairs agent sent to ride along with Walker and report back, is good in a role the script loses interest in halfway through. Mia Sara is mostly in flashback and soft light, which is roughly what the part is.

The plotting is where it comes apart, and it comes apart in the usual places. The film states its rules in a briefing and then observes them when convenient. Walker comes home from one trip to find things in 2004 changed, and the film treats that as new furniture rather than something a man might lose sleep over. The middle stretch repeats itself: go back, fight, come home, be shouted at. And the 18 certificate is earned by three or four deaths staged with a relish the scenes around them do not share, so the tone lurches from Saturday matinee to something nastier and back inside a minute.

Against the time-travel films around it this is a middleweight. The Terminator (1984) made its one rule a knife and held it to the audience’s throat for the whole running time; Back to the Future (1985) made the paradox the joke and worked out every move in advance. Timecop uses time travel chiefly as a way to put Van Damme in a new costume every twenty minutes, and when it tries to be clever about the paradox it generally trips. The second half takes a turn we will not describe; we will say that it leans hard on a rule the film has only just made up.

For an evening with the lights down, it does what it is for. It is short, it is handsome, it has a villain worth hissing and a hero who looks as if he could do the stunts and mostly did. Do not ask about the physics. Ask Silver what he thinks of you, and enjoy the answer.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
2

Most critics treat Timecop as cheerful, undemanding action and are prepared to enjoy it on those terms. The reviews lean mixed rather than hostile: the praise clusters around Van Damme’s physicality and the quantity of kickboxing on offer, with several finding him funnier than expected, particularly in his scenes opposite his younger self. Nearly everyone agrees the time-travel plot makes little sense, and most decide that does not matter much.

The split is over whether the confusion matters. The two negative reviews, from Variety and the Los Angeles Times, think it does: the former finds the action repetitive and the premise wasted despite handsome production design and effects, the latter finds the violence excessive and the whole thing unwelcoming to anyone not already a fan. Later reviews are warmer, with Eye for Film singling out Ron Silver’s villain as the film’s best asset. The spread is wide, from the mid-seventies down to the low thirties, with most settling somewhere in the middle.

Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
75*

Thomas finds the film a brainless but entertaining action romp, despite its incoherent time-travel plot. He praises Van Damme’s physicality and the film’s energetic kickboxing absurdity, while faulting his stiff delivery of one-liners.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 September 1994 · Janet Maslin
64*

The available page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its headline frames the film around its time-travel premise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NF
64*

The available page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is not visible. The metadata describes Van Damme’s time-policing premise but reveals no praise or criticism.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 September 1994 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert gives the film a mixed verdict, finding it an entertaining but routine action movie. He singles out its time-travel premise as a point of interest.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

The critic finds it a gleaming, campy slice of no-brain entertainment despite dated effects and confusing time-travel logic. The review singles out Van Damme’s comic performance, including his encounter with his younger self.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 September 1994 · Kenneth Turan
35*

Turan finds the film’s time-travel plot confusing and its violence excessive, leaving it unappealing to newcomers. He praises its brisk pace and notes Van Damme’s brooding attempt to broaden his acting range.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Timecop worth watching?
Timecop is worth an evening for anyone who likes a dark, well-cut action thriller and can forgive sloppy time-travel plotting, and we scored it 64. Peter Hyams shoots it handsomely, Ron Silver makes a proper villain of Senator McComb, and Van Damme is more watchable as a widower than a kickboxer. Do not ask about the physics.
How long is Timecop, and what is it rated?
Timecop runs 1h 38m. It is a thriller and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Timecop in Argentina?
Timecop is not on any streaming or rental service in Argentina at the moment. It is available in 18 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Timecop, and is it suitable for children?
Timecop carries an 18 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is not for children. Most of it plays as a Saturday matinee action film, but three or four deaths are staged with a relish the surrounding scenes do not share, so the tone lurches into something nastier and back. Older teenagers used to action violence will cope; the squeamish should expect those lurches.
How does Timecop compare to Looper?
Timecop is the lighter and sloppier of the two, and Looper is the better film. Rian Johnson takes the paradox seriously and builds a bruising noir around it, where Hyams uses time travel mainly as an excuse to put Van Damme in a new costume every twenty minutes. Choose Looper if you want the ideas to hold; choose Timecop for a shorter, darker fight film with a villain worth hissing.
What should I watch after Timecop?
After Timecop, try Looper (2012, Fi1m 78): Rian Johnson’s time-travel noir takes the paradox seriously and still finds room for a shootout. Then Demolition Man (1993, Fi1m 68): The other mid-nineties future of rounded cars, with Wesley Snipes having far more fun.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Looper (2012, Fi1m 78)Rian Johnson’s time-travel noir takes the paradox seriously and still finds room for a shootout.

  2. Predestination (2014) · not reviewed yetEthan Hawke in an Australian puzzle box that follows its own rules to the bitter end.

  3. La Jetée (1962) · not reviewed yetChris Marker’s half-hour of still photographs, the source of nearly every time-travel plot since.

  4. Sudden Death (1995) · not reviewed yetHyams and Van Damme again, with an ice hockey final instead of time travel.

  5. Demolition Man (1993, Fi1m 68)The other mid-nineties future of rounded cars, with Wesley Snipes having far more fun.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever