81 (Alan Ritchson) facing a pointing officer during an argument in an office
Film review

War Machine

2026 · Directed by Patrick Hughes · 1h 50m

In a sentenceEveryone in it has a number instead of a name, and the robot is the one we could pick out of a line-up

A veteran known only as 81 (Alan Ritchson) reports for an Army Ranger selection course, where every recruit is a number and nobody is meant to stand out. Alongside him are 7 (Stephan James) and 15 (Blake Richardson); running them into the ground is the Squad Leader (Jai Courtney). Dennis Quaid and Esai Morales appear as Sheridan and Torres, the only two characters with names rather than numbers. 81 says little, carries something from his past he does not discuss, and wants to make it through the course. Training takes the squad out into open country for a live exercise. There, something that is not part of the drill arrives: a giant machine, armoured and hostile, which begins hunting the recruits. Where it came from, nobody on the ground knows.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Patrick Hughes puts Alan Ritchson through Ranger training and then sets a giant machine on him. The fights are staged with real skill; the men in them are numbers rather than people, so the hits land and the losses do not.

Patrick Hughes has made Predator with a Ranger selection course in place of the jungle and Alan Ritchson in place of most of the cast. A silent veteran, known to the film only as 81, reports for training, gets shouted at, and is out on exercise when a machine a good deal larger than he is comes looking for his squad. The tagline is “All grit. No quit.”, and that is a fair account of the ambition. War Machine is a decent, unpretentious action picture with one fine chase in it, a first half hour we could have done without, and a cast of men we could not tell apart, partly because the script never tries to help.

The opening stretch is the problem. Jai Courtney’s Squad Leader runs the recruits into the ground, the recruits take it, and Hughes films the taking with the reverence of a recruiting advert. Nobody has a name. The men are 7 and 15 and 44 and 60, and Cappi Ireland puts them all in the same kit, so for a long while the only way to follow anyone is to follow Ritchson, who is not hard to find in a crowd. We were bored, and bored in the particular way of watching people be shouted at for reasons we were meant to find noble. Then the machine turns up, and we sat up with it.

When it does, Hughes is on firmer ground, and so are his stunt team. He stages the action on real locations rather than inside a computer, and Aaron Morton shoots it so the ground under the actors looks like ground. Andy Canny cuts it so that geography holds: a man goes left, and when we next see him he is still on the left. There is a chase, about five minutes long, that is the best thing in the film and among the better set pieces of its kind we have seen lately. The gore is heavy, bodies come apart, and the 15 certificate is earned early. We winced more than once and were not sorry to.

Ritchson carries it, and he carries it mostly by standing still. He has spent several years playing Reacher on television and knows how little a big man needs to do on screen: a pause before answering, a look held a beat longer than the line, and the film has a centre. Hughes and his co-writer give 81 a past that has hurt him and not much else, and Ritchson fills in the rest with his shoulders. Around him, Stephan James and Blake Richardson, as 7 and 15, are the recruits we could pick out by the end. Dennis Quaid and Esai Morales, as Sheridan and Torres, are the only two people in the film allowed a surname. Everybody else is a number, and everybody else is treated like one.

The script, by Hughes and James Maclurcan, who also appears as 23, is where the film stops trying. The machine has no reason we can see for being there beyond killing, and the film’s interest in it ends at how it kills. Dmitri Golovko’s score hits its marks and leaves no tune behind. Enzo Iacono keeps the camp plain; the machine is where the design went. The politics are simple to the point of being a poster: the Rangers are good, training is good, pain is good for you. Several critics have found that hard to stomach. We found it easier, because the film is so plainly unembarrassed about it, but we would not pretend it is thinking.

Hughes’s earlier films, The Expendables 3 (2014) and The Hitman’s Bodyguard (2017), were noisy, cheerful and cut to ribbons. This is leaner and better shot than either, and it is his best staging of a fight by some distance. But John McTiernan’s Predator (1987) is the comparison the film invites, and McTiernan gave each of his soldiers a personality in about five minutes before the hunting started, so that we minded who was being hunted. Hughes gives his men numbers. When one of them is in trouble, we found ourselves checking which number it was.

Watch it with company and something to drink, and give it the half hour, because the second and third acts pay the first one back. It runs 110 minutes and carries a 15, and both feel about right. It is not about anything, and it does not pretend to be, and there are worse ways to lose a Friday evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

61
Positive
6
Mixed
6
Negative
1

Most critics land between mild approval and a shrug. They agree War Machine is a throwback to the muscular science-fiction action films of the 1980s, Predator above all, and that it knows exactly what it is. The praise clusters around the action: practical stunts, real locations and one or two set-pieces, including a chase several reviews single out. Alan Ritchson’s physical presence is credited almost everywhere, and a few find more in the performance than the script asks for.

The reservations are about everything around the fighting. The story is called predictable and the characters thin almost across the board, and the villain is generic. The spread is wide. The New York Times is the one outright dismissal, finding the film exhausting and objecting to brutality passed off as character growth, and The Wrap shares the complaint about the pro-military stance while still enjoying the robot. Nobody argues it is clever; the argument is whether that matters.

Empire
6 March 2026 · James Dyer
75*

The critic finds the film absurd on almost every level but unarguably entertaining as a big dumb fun '80s-style sci-fi action throwback. They single out the enthusiastic action sequences and Alan Ritchson's physical performance for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 March 2026 · Monica Castillo
70*

The film starts like a stereotypical military movie but evolves into something much weirder and more entertaining with the introduction of a giant killer robot. The script is leaden and predictable outside its central twist, but the action and visuals deliver once it shifts gears.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 March 2026 · B- · Caroline Siede
70

The critic values the film's earnest, old-school military sci-fi tone that mixes classic Americana with brutal R-rated violence and practical action. It succeeds by not aiming too high and delivering familiar tropes with heart.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jayne Nelson
60

This is an enjoyable sci-fi actioner starring Alan Ritchson as a taciturn soldier fighting alien robots during a Rangers training exercise. It starts as a jingoistic military celebration but becomes a charming showcase of the lead's robust screen presence, though it revels in graphic gore.

Read the full review →
Vulture
6 March 2026
60*

The piece notes the film capitalizes on audience desire to see Ritchson fight a robot in a Predator-like setup but faults the thin characterization and lack of memorable supporting figures. It highlights gory action and Ritchson's physical presence.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 March 2026
55*

The film is a slick, unchallenging action thriller with better-than-usual streaming effects that makes for an easy Friday night watch. The critic praises the effective staging of some setpieces and super-sized special effects while complaining that the story is predictable with reheated action sequences and a generic alien antagonist.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is War Machine worth watching?
War Machine is worth watching for anyone who wants a plain, well-staged action picture and can sit through a dull first half hour; we scored it 63. Alan Ritchson carries it and one five-minute chase is the best thing in it, but the recruits are numbers rather than people, so the losses never hurt. Watch it with company.
How long is War Machine, and what is it rated?
War Machine runs 1h 50m. It is an action and science fiction film.
Where can I watch War Machine in Thailand?
War Machine is streaming on Netflix in Thailand. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is War Machine, and is it suitable for children?
War Machine carries a UK 15 and a US R, and the certificate is earned early: the gore is heavy and bodies come apart when the machine attacks. It is a hunt rather than a horror film, so the fear is of the loud, sudden kind. It is not for children; the squeamish should give it a wide berth.
How does War Machine compare to Predator?
War Machine is Predator with a Ranger selection course in place of the jungle, and the earlier film is the better of the two. McTiernan gave each soldier a personality before the hunting began, so we minded who died; Hughes gives his men numbers, and we found ourselves checking which one was in trouble. Both stage the action with real skill, and Ritchson, like Schwarzenegger, convinces as a big man who can be hurt.
What should I watch after War Machine?
After War Machine, try Predator (1987, Fi1m 84): The model, and still the lesson in giving soldiers faces before the hunting starts. Then Southern Comfort (1981, Fi1m 81): National Guardsmen lost in the bayou, hunted by men rather than machines, and scarier for it; and Starship Troopers (1997, Fi1m 79): The recruitment film that knows exactly what it is and smiles while it says so.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Predator (1987, Fi1m 84)The model, and still the lesson in giving soldiers faces before the hunting starts.

  2. Dog Soldiers (2002) · not on Fi1m yetBritish squaddies, a Highland exercise, something in the woods; funnier and just as bloody.

  3. Kill Command (2016) · not on Fi1m yetMarines sent to a training island where the machines have stopped taking orders.

  4. Southern Comfort (1981, Fi1m 81)National Guardsmen lost in the bayou, hunted by men rather than machines, and scarier for it.

  5. Starship Troopers (1997, Fi1m 79)The recruitment film that knows exactly what it is and smiles while it says so.