Film review

Where the Wild Things Are

2009 · Directed by Spike Jonze · 1h 41m · MPA PG

In a sentenceBeing a monster looks exhausting, especially when everyone keeps hurting your feelings

AdventureDramaFamilyFantasy

A boy wrestles with loneliness, anger and the difficulty of growing up. Catherine Keener plays his mother, while his imaginative life takes him into the world of the Wild Things. Carol (voiced by James Gandolfini), KW (Lauren Ambrose) and Judith (Catherine O’Hara) are among the creatures he encounters there. Their world offers room for rough play, but being together also means dealing with other people’s hurts and demands. As he gets to know the creatures, questions of friendship and leadership become part of his adventure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spike Jonze’s fantasy understands the anger and loneliness of childhood, with its young lead giving it a difficult, believable centre. The creatures talk too much, but their hurt feelings make this a moving choice for older children and adults.

Spike Jonze takes a child’s bad moods seriously in Where the Wild Things Are, and that is the reason to see it. This is a moving, carefully made fantasy, carried by a child actor who never begs us to find him charming. Working with co-writer Dave Eggers, Jonze gives the boy imaginary companions whose hurts and resentments are recognisably human. Several of the creatures’ conversations could have been shorter.

Records gives us a boy who can be selfish, furious and lonely without pausing to ask which response would make him more likeable. We were upset by his early bursts of anger, because Records makes the need for attention painfully clear beneath the bad behaviour. Jonze allows the opening scenes to be unruly, and the performance has the abrupt changes of mood that make childhood difficult to live through and difficult to supervise.

K.K. Barrett’s production design and Lance Acord’s cinematography make the Wild Things’ surroundings feel solid enough to explore. The creatures have weight, and the landscapes do not look as though they have been arranged for anyone’s comfort. That matters in the rough play, when pleasure and the possibility of being hurt remain close together. The mixture of puppetry and animation lets the beasts stay odd without distancing us from their moods.

James Gandolfini’s voice gives Carol a vulnerability that makes the creature’s size less reassuring. Lauren Ambrose as KW and Catherine O’Hara as Judith help keep the beasts from sounding like variations on one unhappy person. Their voices are distinct, and each makes the need to be heard feel pressing. The combination of an imposing creature and a wounded voice makes ordinary sulking unsettling, and Jonze lets that discomfort persist without asking the actors to turn every complaint into a joke.

The slackness comes when the same emotional problems keep returning without much changing between them. Editors James Haygood and Eric Zumbrunnen preserve the freedom of the play sequences, but the longer conversations leave the middle of the film feeling padded. Karen O and Carter Burwell provide the music; the songs sometimes push for a response that the actors have already earned. At 101 minutes, this is hardly an endurance test, though a few passages give us too much time to understand feelings that were clear when a creature first opened its mouth.

For a family fantasy, it is unusually willing to let make-believe become awkward. A child can imagine creatures to play with and still find it difficult to get along with them; Jonze understands how quickly the wish for company can become a demand that everyone behave exactly as we want. Some of the parallels between the boy and the monsters are too obvious, but the performers give their unhappiness enough conviction to hold our attention. The roughness of the play is especially welcome.

Despite the PG certificate, the sadness and darker passages may trouble younger children more than the fantasy setting suggests. We recommend it most readily to older children and adults who remember being angry without knowing what to do about it. Allow for the talkative middle, and do not choose it simply because everybody is in the mood for something cuddly.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

75
Positive
11
Mixed
2
Negative
1
Empire
27 November 2009 · Dan Jolin
80*

Jonze delivers a plotless, bittersweet mood-piece that laments the passing of childhood while celebrating its rough, imaginative play. The Wild Things are reimagined as deeply human figures representing aspects of Max's psyche, brought to life through subtle effects and strong voice work.

Read the full review →
Time Out
8 December 2009 · ★★★★ · Ben Walters
80

Jonze expands the slim picture book into a psychologically realistic and visually grounded fantasy that evocatively captures the timbre of childhood imagining. The critic praises the solid, tactile creature designs and young lead performance but notes it can feel ponderous and over-determined at times.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 October 2009 · festival review
75*

Jonze delivers a creative, melancholic portrait of a child coming to terms with growing up through this adaptation. The review singles out the imaginative, tactile visual approach blending puppetry and modern techniques, along with the genuine emotional depth, as strengths.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 December 2009 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic describes the film as a subdued, deadpan and slightly depressive expansion of the book into a psychological study of childhood loneliness and dysfunction. It grew on him as an intriguing oddity that falls between adult and child sensibilities, darker and colder than expected, with clever design but little Christmas jollity.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
11 December 2009 · 5/3/4 · Matt Bochenski
60

Jonze's adaptation of the classic children's book delivers mixed results overall. The critic highlights the technical achievement of the creature designs and performances as a standout element amid narrative inconsistencies.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 October 2009 · David Denby
60*

Finds the opening sequences sensationally good at capturing a boy's impetuousness and egotism, with the monsters rendered faithfully and some scenes peerless in freedom and warmth. Complains that the creatures become too talkative and peevish, turning the film into something about futility rather than liberation.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The Spirit of the Beehive poster

The Spirit of the Beehive

1973 · For another child’s imaginative life, treated patiently and without easy reassurance.

My Neighbour Totoro poster

My Neighbour Totoro

1988 · Another encounter between children and enormous creatures, with more comfort in the company.

The Red Balloon poster

The Red Balloon

1956 · A lonely child finds companionship in a fantasy with little need for talk.

A Monster Calls poster

A Monster Calls

2016 · For older children, another imposing creature gives difficult feelings a voice.

Petite Maman poster

Petite Maman

2021 · Childhood make-believe becomes a way to approach feelings adults cannot easily explain.