Kate Curtis (Amanda Peet) runs with Lilly and Noah through smoke and airport wreckage
Film review

2012

2009 · Directed by Roland Emmerich · 2h 38m · RTC B

In a sentenceWoody Harrelson eats a pickle while Yellowstone explodes, and the other 150 minutes could learn something from him

The title is the date and the tagline is the warning: the world is going to end, and governments have known for some time. Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is the scientist who works out how little time is left and has to tell Carl Anheuser (Oliver Platt) and President Thomas Wilson (Danny Glover). Jackson Curtis (John Cusack) is a divorced writer with a weekend to spend with his children, Noah (Liam James) and Lilly (Morgan Lily), while his ex-wife Kate (Amanda Peet) stays in Los Angeles with her boyfriend Gordon Silberman (Tom McCarthy). On the road Jackson meets Charlie Frost (Woody Harrelson), a broadcaster who has been saying for years that the ground is about to give way, and that the rich, Yuri Karpov (Zlatko Burić) among them, have bought their way out.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Roland Emmerich knocks the planet down with skill for an hour, then spends ninety minutes asking us to care about the people he has knocked it down on. The destruction is as good as he has ever managed; the rest is the usual.

Roland Emmerich has ended the world with aliens in Independence Day (1996) and with weather in The Day After Tomorrow (2004). In 2012 he does it with the planet itself. We go to Emmerich films to watch cities fall over, and for about an hour 2012 does that as well as it has ever been done. The trouble is that it runs 158 minutes, and once the cities are down it has no clear idea what to do with the people who were standing in them.

The Los Angeles escape is the reason to see it. Jackson Curtis collects his children, his ex-wife and her boyfriend in a limousine as the ground opens, and for ten minutes the car threads between falling office blocks and a street that tips sideways towards the Pacific. Dean Semler shoots it in hard California daylight, with no night and no smoke to hide behind. Then a light aircraft takes off from a runway breaking up beneath it and flies at roof level through a city sliding into the sea. We laughed out loud, and it was admiring laughter. Each disaster arrives half a second after the car has passed, and the timing is so exact that the sequence becomes slapstick with a budget.

Yellowstone is nearly as good, and better acted. Woody Harrelson’s Charlie Frost broadcasts from a camper van, lives on pickles, and greets the eruption of the largest volcano on the continent as the best day of his life. Shay Cunliffe gets him right at a glance, bucket hat and a vest with too many pockets. When the caldera goes, in a wall of black ash that fills the sky behind him, it is the one moment where the spectacle and a human being point the same way. The loudest thing in the film is not Harald Kloser and Thomas Wander’s score, all brass and timpani, but the rumble under that eruption, which we felt in the seat.

Then everyone has to get to China, and the people start to matter, and this is where it goes wrong. Emmerich and Kloser’s script gives Jackson a divorce, two children and a book nobody bought; John Cusack plays him with a tired decency that gets lost in a film this size. Amanda Peet’s Kate exists to look at her ex-husband and slowly reconsider. Tom McCarthy’s Gordon is the most useful person in the car and the script treats him as a joke because he is not the father. Zlatko Burić’s Yuri Karpov is written as a cartoon and Burić gives him a weary grandeur the writing has not earned. We could have told you in the first half hour which of these people the film means to keep.

The Washington half is better written, because Chiwetel Ejiofor and Oliver Platt are in it. Ejiofor’s Adrian Helmsley has to tell powerful men what they do not want to hear, and he plays it straight until the script makes him deliver a sermon. Platt’s Carl Anheuser has done the sums on who can be saved and will not apologise for the answer. He is the only character whose view the film finds inconvenient, and Platt argues it so well that the film has to shout him down. Danny Glover’s President Thomas Wilson is grave and kindly, and Thandiwe Newton, as his daughter Laura, gets an interest in Ejiofor and not much else.

David Brenner and Peter S. Elliot cut between Los Angeles, Yellowstone, Washington and the arks, and for the first hour the cross-cutting builds pressure. After that it becomes a timetable. Barry Chusid’s arks are vast grey hulls in a hangar cut into a mountain, smooth and with nothing in them to break, so the last forty minutes have none of the detail of the Los Angeles streets. Somewhere in the second hour we stopped counting cities and started counting minutes. By then we had seen the planet crack three times, and the fourth did not frighten us, and the script’s answer was to have people make speeches about humanity. We were bored, and the speeches made us cross.

Independence Day was just as silly and got away with it because it had a joke for every explosion. 2012 has the explosions. See it for the first hour, and at home, where you can stop it once Yellowstone has finished going off and tell yourself the rest was a sequel. It carries a 12A and runs 158 minutes, of which about sixty are the ones you want.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The reviews split almost evenly, and the one thing nearly every critic agrees on is where the money went. The digital destruction is praised by those who enjoyed the film and by those who did not: the Los Angeles escape sequence is singled out, and even the harsher notices concede the effects are expensive and often spectacular. The warmer reviews take the film as a knowingly ridiculous disaster picture, dumb but exhilarating, and judge it a success on those terms.

The spread is wide, from near-raves to dismissals. Reservations cluster on the script, the running time and the thin human story, and several critics find the destruction grows monotonous before the end. The sharpest dissents come from Slant Magazine and NME, who find it tedious or unintentionally funny rather than entertaining, while The AV Club thinks even the spectacle looks stale. The Evening Standard alone finds it thoughtful, crediting a political satire nobody else mentions.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012
90*

The critic finds the film thrilling, ridiculous and unexpectedly thoughtful. They single out its spectacular effects and political satire, while praising the cast’s humanity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 November 2009 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Huddleston acknowledges the film is infantile but presents it as a near-perfect disaster movie. The available text offers no further detail on what the review singles out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 October 2009 · Xan Brooks
70*

Brooks finds the film dumb and over-the-top but exhilarating, and expects it to be a hit. He praises its relentless, gut-wrenching action set-pieces, while faulting its lack of nuance and schmaltzy moments.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 November 2009 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The review text is behind a paywall, so its verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the critic is visible.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
11 November 2009 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert finds the film entertaining as a disaster spectacle, though its human story is weak. He singles out the elaborate visual effects as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
13 November 2008 · Kim Newman
60*

Newman calls the film fundamentally terrible but almost irresistibly entertaining, with its horrors growing monotonous in the middle. He praises its spectacular, value-for-money destruction and finds the overblown disaster spectacle hard to resist.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is 2012 worth watching?
2012 is worth watching for the first hour, in which Roland Emmerich knocks over Los Angeles and Yellowstone as well as he ever has, and we scored it 57. The remaining ninety minutes ask us to care about a divorced writer and his family, and the speeches about humanity left us bored and then cross. Watch it at home and stop once the volcano has finished.
How long is 2012, and what is it rated?
2012 runs 2h 38m and is rated B by the RTC in Mexico. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch 2012 in Mexico?
2012 is streaming on HBO Max, Netflix and Amazon Prime Video in Mexico, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from MX$50.00. It leaves HBO Max on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is 2012, and is it suitable for children?
2012 carries a UK 12A certificate, and its violence is cities falling over rather than people being hurt on screen in close detail. The scale of the destruction, the rumble under the Yellowstone eruption and the sight of whole streets tipping into the sea could frighten younger children, but there is little gore. Teenagers who enjoy watching the world end should manage it comfortably.
How does 2012 compare to Independence Day?
2012 has bigger and better destruction than Independence Day, but the earlier film is the better evening because it has a joke for every explosion and a cast that makes saving the world cheerful. 2012 has the explosions and then ninety minutes of family drama and sermons. If you want spectacle alone, 2012 for an hour; if you want to enjoy the whole film, Independence Day.
What should I watch after 2012?
After 2012, try Independence Day (1996, Fi1m 75): Emmerich’s earlier apocalypse, with the jokes this one forgot to pack. Then The Towering Inferno (1974, Fi1m 68): One building, one night, and a cast that takes the fire seriously; and Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74): Tokyo is flattened and then the real drama begins: the committee meetings.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Independence Day (1996, Fi1m 75)Emmerich’s earlier apocalypse, with the jokes this one forgot to pack.

  2. The Towering Inferno (1974, Fi1m 68)One building, one night, and a cast that takes the fire seriously.

  3. Deep Impact (1998) · not reviewed yetThe quieter end of the world, more interested in goodbyes than collapsing freeways.

  4. The Wave (2015) · not reviewed yetA Norwegian fjord, a landslide and ten minutes to get uphill; tight and local.

  5. Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74)Tokyo is flattened and then the real drama begins: the committee meetings.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever