Henry Graham (Walter Matthau) gestures from his desk as a group gathers around him
Film review

A New Leaf

1971 · Directed by Elaine May · 1h 42m

In a sentenceWalter Matthau treats the prospect of affection as an unreasonable demand on his afternoon

Henry Graham (Walter Matthau) brings a cold reserve to his dealings with Henrietta Lowell (Elaine May), a guileless heiress whose awkwardness makes her an unlikely match for him. He has little interest in anybody else’s feelings; she is far less practised at protecting her own. Among the people around them are Harold (George Rose), Uncle Harry (James Coco) and Andy McPherson (Jack Weston). As Henry and Henrietta become involved, her trust exposes her to a man whose self-interest gives her plenty of reason to be cautious.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Elaine May and Walter Matthau make an unlikely romantic pairing funny and unexpectedly affecting. The pacing is slack in places, but the attention given to Henrietta keeps the comedy from becoming a prolonged exercise in cruelty.

A New Leaf is a funny, unexpectedly tender comedy with a pace that sometimes needs a firm word. Elaine May writes and directs, and plays Henrietta Lowell opposite Walter Matthau’s Henry Graham. The difficult job is to make a cold, self-serving man worth spending time with while giving the woman opposite him something more than the duty of improving him. She largely manages it, without making Henry’s company any more comfortable than it should be.

Walter Matthau makes Henry’s self-regard funny by giving it so little visible strain. There is no pleading for affection in the performance, and no need to underline each piece of unpleasantness. His reserve suggests someone who considers his own convenience an adequate explanation for everything, and finds further discussion faintly improper. We can enjoy the precision of the acting without needing to find the man charming.

Elaine May has the harder task, because Henrietta’s awkwardness could easily reduce her to a collection of comic mannerisms. She gives those mannerisms a sense of the person experiencing them, including the sweetness that makes her vulnerable to Henry. We laughed at the contrast between his composure and her guilelessness, then felt protective of her. That feeling comes from the difference between the performances: he appears thoroughly defended, while she has scarcely thought to defend herself.

The writing keeps finding humour in that uncomfortable difference. The dialogue is sharp enough to make Henry’s cynicism entertaining, although the performance opposite him supplies the stronger reason to care what happens between them. Romantic comedy often gives its awkward partner the thankless job of teaching the colder one how to behave. Henrietta holds our attention in her own right, and we would resent any suggestion that fixing Henry was her sole purpose.

Gayne Rescher’s cinematography and the production design by Warren Clymer and Richard Fried are less distinctive pleasures. We remember the people more clearly than their surroundings, which seems fair enough for a comedy so dependent on the amount of sympathy each performer permits. Neal Hefti provides the music, though the actors’ contrasting delivery supplies the rhythm we notice most. Our attention keeps returning to the performances.

The editing, credited to Don Guidice, Fredric Steinkamp and Edward Beyer, leaves a more substantial reservation. Some stretches linger after their comic point has registered, and the looseness can make the film feel longer than its 102 minutes. The performances often benefit from being allowed room, but that does not mean every pause deserves equal patience. We wanted a little more decisiveness about moving on; a dry comedy loses some of its sting when we have too long to anticipate the next discomfort.

That slackness is worth allowing for, especially if brisk plotting is the main pleasure a comedy offers you. The stronger reason to watch is the attention Elaine May gives Henrietta, even when Henry’s appalling attitude is getting the laughs. There is warmth here, earned by taking an awkward person seriously enough to let her be funny without making her negligible. Choose it for the actors, and do not expect them to hurry.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

81
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics greet A New Leaf warmly, with praise centred on Elaine May and Walter Matthau’s contrasting performances. May’s guileless manner and inventive physical comedy draw particular admiration, while Matthau’s cold restraint and deadpan delivery give the humour its bite. The reviews also value the sharp dialogue and the tenderness beneath the black comedy: several find emotional depth in characters whose behaviour could have remained merely a source of laughs.

The reservations concern pace and construction rather than the central performances, and the available verdicts range from qualified approval to strong enthusiasm. Time Out finds that the studio’s drastic re-editing leaves rough edges, while Empire admires the character study despite the compromised cut. The Skinny considers the pace lackadaisical but still finds May’s comedy distinctive and fully formed. The differences are chiefly about how much these flaws matter, with no substantial negative case emerging from the accessible reviews.

Slant Magazine
13 April 2004 · ★★★★/4 · Keith Uhlich
100

Uhlich calls the film one of cinema’s great comedies, praising its emotional depth beneath the laughter. He singles out May’s humane portrayal of Henrietta, which turns her comic mannerisms into a fully realized inner life.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
12 September 2012 · A- · Nathan Rabin
90

Rabin praises the film as a big-hearted black comedy and an invigorating story of an irredeemable cad softened by love. He singles out the comic contrast between Walter Matthau’s cold restraint and Elaine May’s guileless sweetness.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
2 June 2023 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody calls the film one of the best romantic comedies ever made and praises May’s combination of audacious emotional insight and comic invention. He singles out May’s performance and the honeymoon nightgown sequence as especially inventive and moving.

Read the full review →
Empire
13 June 2006 · David Parkinson
80*

The review finds the film a wonderful, unexpectedly funny character study despite its compromised studio cut. It especially praises Walter Matthau’s performance and Elaine May’s comic portrayal of the hapless heiress.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

The review calls the film a sophisticated, cynical black comedy. It praises its wonderfully mordant edge.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1970 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the film sophisticated, funny, and mostly adroitly assembled. It praises Walter Matthau’s satirical performance and Elaine May’s sharp, amusing dialogue.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is A New Leaf worth watching?
A New Leaf is worth watching for Elaine May and Walter Matthau’s funny, unexpectedly tender pairing, and we score it 83. We recommend it for the contrast between his cold self-interest and her unguarded awkwardness, though the slack pacing may test anyone who wants a romantic comedy to move briskly.
How long is A New Leaf, and what is it rated?
A New Leaf runs 1h 42m. It is a comedy and romance film.
Where can I watch A New Leaf in Canada?
A New Leaf is streaming on Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in Canada, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CA$4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does A New Leaf compare to The Lady Eve?
A New Leaf offers a gentler, more awkward romantic pairing than The Lady Eve, though both find comedy in scheming courtship and inconvenient feelings. We give The Lady Eve the edge for a sharp romance with a calculating, vulnerable woman at its centre; A New Leaf suits those drawn to Henrietta’s guilelessness, provided they can forgive its slack stretches.
What should I watch after A New Leaf?
After A New Leaf, try The Lady Eve (1941, Fi1m 90): A scheming courtship, sharp dialogue and feelings that complicate everyone’s carefully arranged plans. Then Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949, Fi1m 91): Another dry comedy that gives appalling intentions the benefit of impeccable manners; and The Heartbreak Kid (1972, Fi1m 78): A harsher treatment of romantic selfishness, keeping the embarrassment and reducing the reassurance.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Lady Eve (1941, Fi1m 90)A scheming courtship, sharp dialogue and feelings that complicate everyone’s carefully arranged plans.

  2. Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949, Fi1m 91)Another dry comedy that gives appalling intentions the benefit of impeccable manners.

  3. The Heartbreak Kid (1972, Fi1m 78)A harsher treatment of romantic selfishness, keeping the embarrassment and reducing the reassurance.

  4. Cousin Cousine (1975) · not reviewed yetA gentler romantic comedy, with affection for people who inconvenience polite society.

  5. The Man Without a Past (2002) · not reviewed yetDeadpan humour and an unhurried romance, with kindness allowed to arrive without speeches.