Anastasia (Meg Ryan) looking up with mouth open amid falling snow
Film review

Anastasia

1997 · Directed by Don Bluth, Gary Goldman · 1h 34m

In a sentenceThe fall of the Romanovs, retold as a con with a talking bat; the ballroom scene nearly excuses it

St Petersburg, 1916. At a ball in the palace, the Dowager Empress Marie (Angela Lansbury) gives her granddaughter Anastasia (Kirsten Dunst) a music box and a necklace engraved ‘Together in Paris’. The disgraced holy man Rasputin (Christopher Lloyd) curses the family, a mob storms the palace, and a kitchen boy helps the two escape through the servants’ quarters; in the crush at the station, Anastasia is lost. Ten years on, an orphan called Anya (Meg Ryan) leaves the orphanage with the necklace and no memory of anything before the age of eight, and heads for St Petersburg, where Dimitri (John Cusack) and Vladimir (Kelsey Grammer) are auditioning girls to pass off as the princess for the Empress’s reward in Paris. Rasputin, not quite dead, learns that one Romanov got away, and his bat Bartok (Hank Azaria) would rather he let it go.

Fi1m review

Don Bluth and Gary Goldman’s handsome fake-princess musical is at its best when it stops to waltz and at its worst whenever Rasputin turns up. Children will be fine; adults will enjoy the palaces and have to forgive the history.

Don Bluth and Gary Goldman have taken the oldest rumour of the last century, that one Romanov daughter walked away from the revolution, and made a 94-minute musical out of it. Susan Gauthier, Bob Tzudiker, Bruce Graham and Noni White’s script gives the legend the shape of a con-artist picture: two chancers need a girl to pass off as the princess, and pick the one girl in Russia who might be her. It is a decent, good-looking film with one scene we will remember for a long time and a villain it did not need.

The look is the best of it. Michael Peraza’s production design gives us the palace twice: first lit by candles for the ball, all gilt and mirror and red carpet, then ten years on with the windows boarded, the chandeliers under sheets and snow drifting across the ballroom floor. St Petersburg is drawn in grey and blue, Paris in cream and gold, and the film uses its wide frame to keep whole streets in view. The set pieces are helped by computer animation, a runaway train on a collapsing bridge most of all, and the carriages have weight.

We were moved, more than we expected to be by a film with a talking bat in it, when Anya wanders into the ruined ballroom and sings to herself. The figures in the paintings step down and dance with her, the candles relight as her memory fills the hall, and the last couple to fade are her parents. Bob Bender and Fiona Trayler cut the sequence to the waltz rather than the other way round, and David Newman’s score carries the tune into the rest of the film, so that it keeps turning up under the chase scenes as a reminder of what she is looking for. Nothing else here is that good.

The voices are well chosen. Meg Ryan plays Anya as a brisk, modern American with no patience for being rescued, and John Cusack’s Dimitri is a mumbler who does his best work when he is losing an argument. Kelsey Grammer gives Vladimir a fond, weary decency, and Bernadette Peters turns up late as a cousin in Paris and enjoys herself. Angela Lansbury, as the Dowager Empress, is the one actor who sounds as if she knows what the story is about: a woman who has had too many girls brought to her door and has stopped hoping.

The songs are a mixed bag. The waltz is lovely, and Anya’s number on the road out of the orphanage, sung to a landscape of snow and telegraph poles, earns its size. Others stop the film dead, and a comic number about Paris is the sort of thing you use to put the kettle on.

Then there is Rasputin. The writers have decided the revolution needs a cause and hand it to Christopher Lloyd’s holy man, a corpse in limbo whose hands and eyeballs keep dropping off, with Hank Azaria’s Bartok the bat for company. Lloyd has a good time and the green sprites in his big number are handsomely drawn. But every time the film cuts to him, the story with people in it stops, and we found ourselves waiting to be let back on the train. Worse is what he stands in for. The real Anastasia was shot with her family in 1918. The film turns that into a curse and a fall through the ice, but it has taken a massacre and used it as a fairytale prologue, and grown-ups will notice.

Against Bluth’s own record it is his most polished film and his least personal. The Secret of NIMH (1982) and An American Tail (1986) frightened children on purpose and were the better for it; here the darkness is confined to Rasputin’s cellar and the rest could have come from any studio in the late nineties. Most critics found it pleasant and forgettable, and we are only a little warmer than that. The U certificate is fair, though the decomposing villain may bother the very small. Watch it for the ballroom and the bridge, and do not feel bad about talking through the bat.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

53
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews are split down the middle, and the praise clusters almost entirely on the look of the film. Most critics admire the animation: the widescreen backgrounds, the carefully rendered settings, the blending of computer work with traditional cels, and a general lift in quality over Don Bluth’s recent films. Rasputin’s anarchic villainy draws some warmth too, and several find the central love story engaging enough to carry the film for children.

The reservations are about everything underneath the surface. The songs are called weak more than once, the plot is judged predictable and built from familiar animated-film conventions, and the liberties taken with the Romanovs trouble more than one critic. Variety and The AV Club go furthest, finding it formulaic and short of a creative spark. Radio Times draws the line by age: children will enjoy it, adults may not. The spread is wide, from a firm recommendation at RogerEbert.com to plain disappointment, with no single view dominant.

RogerEbert.com
21 November 1997 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert gives the film a positive review. The page content is blocked, so its specific praise cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
65*

Thomas finds the film charming and entertaining, though ultimately unremarkable. He particularly objects to its idealised portrayal of the Romanovs.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DA
65*

The review presents the film as an engaging love story, though its songs are a notable weakness. It praises the animation as a major improvement over Don Bluth’s recent work.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Joanna Berry
60

Berry says historical liberties may disappoint adults, while children are likely to enjoy the sweet adventure. She singles out its appeal to children as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 November 1997 · Todd McCarthy
35*

McCarthy finds the film ambitious but only moderately effective, lacking the creative spark to rise above familiar formula. He praises its colorful widescreen visuals and some dramatic moments, while criticizing awkward story elements and uneven animation.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 April 2002 · Maria Schneider
30*

The critic finds the film disappointingly predictable and overly reliant on familiar animated-movie conventions. Its sumptuous settings and carefully rendered backgrounds are praised, especially the blend of computer animation with traditional cels.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Anastasia worth watching?
Anastasia is worth watching for families and for anyone who likes a well-drawn palace, and we scored it 64. The ruined ballroom waltz is the one scene we will remember for a long time; the rest is a decent con-artist musical that stops dead whenever Rasputin and his bat turn up. Adults will enjoy the look and have to forgive what it does to the history.
How long is Anastasia, and what is it rated?
Anastasia runs 1h 34m. It is an animation and family film.
Where can I watch Anastasia in Hong Kong?
Anastasia is streaming on Disney+ in Hong Kong. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Anastasia compare to Nicholas and Alexandra?
Anastasia is a 94-minute animated musical that turns the Romanovs' fall into a fairytale prologue, while Nicholas and Alexandra is a three-hour live-action account of the same family and the actual history. The animation is the more enjoyable evening and the better made scene for scene; Schaffner's film is the more honest and the slower sit. Take the cartoon for children and the ballroom, the drama for Janet Suzman and the facts.
What should I watch after Anastasia?
After Anastasia, try Nicholas and Alexandra (1971, Fi1m 58): The same family, the actual history, three hours and not a single bat. Then The Secret of NIMH (1982, Fi1m 74): Bluth at his darkest; the field mice carry more menace than Rasputin manages; and The Prince of Egypt (1998, Fi1m 74): The other late-nineties hand-drawn musical with a real sense of scale and better songs.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1998

Nominated
Best Original Musical or Comedy Score

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 1998

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film, 1997

Won
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Anastasia (1956) · not on Fi1m yetIngrid Bergman plays the same con straight; the scene with the grandmother is the point.

  2. Nicholas and Alexandra (1971, Fi1m 58)The same family, the actual history, three hours and not a single bat.

  3. The Secret of NIMH (1982, Fi1m 74)Bluth at his darkest; the field mice carry more menace than Rasputin manages.

  4. The Prince of Egypt (1998, Fi1m 74)The other late-nineties hand-drawn musical with a real sense of scale and better songs.

  5. Wolfwalkers (2020) · not on Fi1m yetHand-drawn and alive; proof the form did not die with the century.