Lady Sarah Ashley (Nicole Kidman) runs through smoke and wreckage beside a train
Film review

Australia

2008 · Directed by Baz Luhrmann · 2h 45m

In a sentenceNicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman could have had a lovely evening if the plot had left them alone

Lady Sarah Ashley (Nicole Kidman) and The Drover (Hugh Jackman) have cattle to move through the Outback. The drive brings them together, with romance developing around the practical business of getting a herd across the landscape. Neil Fletcher (David Wenham), King Carney (Bryan Brown) and King George (David Gulpilil) also figure in the drama, alongside Katherine (Essie Davis) and a Sergeant (John Jarratt). Baz Luhrmann directs a 165-minute adventure that combines the cattle drive with the relationship between its leads.

Fi1m review

Baz Luhrmann’s Australia has enough beauty and romantic warmth to make its muddle frustrating. The stars can hold our attention, but 165 minutes of uneven storytelling exhaust the goodwill they earn.

Baz Luhrmann wants Australia to provide a whole evening’s entertainment: adventure, romance, handsome stars and a great deal of scenery. There is pleasure in that ambition, and enough on screen to make the disappointment matter. But the film keeps interrupting its own attractions, and its 165 minutes ask for more patience than the story earns. It is hard to settle into a romance when the storytelling keeps getting restless.

Nicole Kidman, as Lady Sarah Ashley, and Hugh Jackman, as The Drover, give us the most reliable reason to keep watching. Jackman’s sincerity is particularly useful in a film so prone to overstatement. We were touched by his romantic playing, because he lets the affection seem simple rather than making every moment another occasion for display. Kidman and Jackman are persuasive together, though the story does not always give their attraction time to develop.

Mandy Walker’s cinematography makes the Outback a substantial part of the appeal, giving the scenery a grandeur the storytelling cannot consistently match. The cattle drive supplies the excitement promised by all that scale. We can follow a clear physical task and enjoy the movement, which is a relief after the fussier passages. Some unconvincing visual effects intrude on that pleasure, occasionally making the image look less solid just when the action needs weight.

Catherine Martin’s production and costume design suit Luhrmann’s appetite for display: the clothes and surroundings are there to be enjoyed at length. That richness is a legitimate pleasure in an adventure romance, even when it encourages the film to linger. David Hirschfelder’s score is less helpful, adding emphasis to emotions that the actors could carry without so much assistance. The music leaves too little space around their performances.

The editing by Michael McCusker and Dody Dorn never quite settles the changes of pace. Individual stretches have energy, but their arrangement keeps breaking the feeling that one event follows naturally from another. The film can hurry through something that needs attention and then spend too long insisting on something we have already understood. This is where the length becomes wearing: there is ample time for the story, yet surprisingly little sense of which parts deserve it.

That weakness also belongs to the screenplay, credited to Stuart Beattie, Baz Luhrmann, Richard Flanagan and Ronald Harwood. Its determination to provide more incident makes the later stretches feel increasingly contrived, without giving the central relationship much more depth. We do not need realism from this sort of melodrama, but we do need to believe in the importance of each new complication. Too often, we are simply waiting for Kidman and Jackman to have the screen to themselves again.

We can accept coincidence, excess and people looking improbably good under pressure in an adventure romance. Luhrmann understands the appeal, and the cattle drive shows he can deliver it with conviction. But occasional excitement is not enough to make the whole journey worth recommending, especially when the romance is repeatedly crowded out. At 165 minutes, we would want to be considerably fonder of it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
2
Mixed
6
Negative
1

Most critics land in the middle on Australia, and they broadly agree on what it is: a big, old-fashioned melodrama that knows exactly how much it wants to be loved. Where the praise clusters is on Brandon Walters, whom several reviews name as the emotional heart of the film and the one performance everyone warms to. The cattle drive comes next, singled out repeatedly as the stretch where spectacle and story pull in the same direction, and the Outback landscapes earn steady praise even from the doubters.

The reservations cluster around length and tone. Most find it overlong and overblown, with a final act that several describe as contrived or simply falling apart, and a few note patchy digital effects and choppy cutting. The spread is wide. The Hollywood Reporter and The Guardian are won over despite the excess, while Eye for Film dismisses the film outright as tedious and poorly acted, a view no one else shares.

The Hollywood Reporter
17 November 2008 · Megan Lehmann
75*

Lehmann finds the melodramatic epic rousing and broadly captivating despite some romance and narrative missteps. She singles out Brandon Walters for giving the sprawling story its emotional heart.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 December 2008 · Philip French
70*

French finds the film absurd but entertaining, despite its overblown, Hollywood-style approach. He praises its exciting cattle-drive sequence and the evocative Outback landscapes.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 November 2008 · Todd McCarthy
65*

McCarthy finds the film an entertaining, if uneven and overlong, melodrama whose eager-to-please approach should appeal to general audiences without fully sweeping them away. He singles out Brandon Walters’s natural, winning performance and the beauty of the stars and landscapes, while criticizing the choppy pacing and some weak CGI.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 November 2008 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert’s verdict was mixed, finding the film’s epic ambitions overblown. He singled out its visual spectacle, while faulting the story’s excesses.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 December 2008 · ★★★ · Nina Caplan
60

Caplan gives the film three out of five, a middling verdict. The accessible text offers only the premise, so it does not reveal what she specifically praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 December 2008 · Chris Hewitt
50*

The critic finds the film visually impressive but wildly inconsistent, with an overlong and contrived final stretch. They praise its stunning visuals and thrilling cattle stampede.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Australia worth watching?
Australia is a mixed recommendation, and we scored it 58: there is beauty, a well-shot cattle drive and real warmth between Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman, but 165 minutes of restless, uneven storytelling wear that goodwill down. Watch it if you are fond of the stars and can forgive a romance that keeps being interrupted by plot.
How long is Australia, and what is it rated?
Australia runs 2h 45m. It is an adventure and romance film.
Where can I watch Australia in Israel?
Australia is available to rent from Apple TV from ₪16.90. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Australia, and is it suitable for children?
Australia carries a 12A certificate, so it is suitable for most children of secondary-school age with an adult, and younger viewers may be fine with it. Our review describes an adventure romance built around a cattle drive, with moments of excitement rather than anything brutal or frightening; the more likely problem for children is the length.
What should I watch after Australia?
After Australia, try The African Queen (1951, Fi1m 84): An unlikely couple finds romance through practical hardship, with considerably less fuss. Then Walkabout (1971, Fi1m 85): A harsher encounter with the Australian landscape, stripped of reassuring romantic grandeur.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2009

Nominated
Best Costume Design

If you liked this, try…

  1. The African Queen (1951, Fi1m 84)An unlikely couple finds romance through practical hardship, with considerably less fuss.

  2. A Town Like Alice (1956) · not reviewed yetFor sweeping romance and Australian connections, with more patience for the people.

  3. The Horseman on the Roof (1995) · not reviewed yetAnother expansive period romance, with danger giving the attraction a practical urgency.

  4. Walkabout (1971, Fi1m 85)A harsher encounter with the Australian landscape, stripped of reassuring romantic grandeur.

  5. Lagaan (2001) · not reviewed yetFor unabashed spectacle, romance and communal struggle, held together by one clear contest.