Todd Hewitt (Tom Holland) stands aboard a small boat beside a seated passenger and a dog
Film review

Chaos Walking

2021 · Directed by Doug Liman · 1h 49m

In a sentenceTom Holland is trying to keep his thoughts private; we would have appreciated the occasional success

Todd Hewitt (Tom Holland) lives with the Noise, which makes his thoughts audible and visible. He repeats his own name in an effort to control what other people can hear. His encounters with Viola Eade (Daisy Ridley) bring desire and embarrassment into the open, while Mayor David Prentiss (Mads Mikkelsen) represents authority in a society where thought can be used to control others. Todd needs to manage his mind, but his efforts to contain what he thinks leave him struggling to keep anything to himself.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Chaos Walking has a useful idea and two leads worth following, but little sense of what to do with either. Tom Holland makes public embarrassment funny; the adventure around him is thin, hurried and hard to care about.

Chaos Walking is a disappointing science-fiction adventure with an idea that deserves a better script. Doug Liman takes the Noise, which makes thoughts available for others to hear and see, and builds a film around the difficulty of keeping anything to yourself. There is plenty to explore in that: embarrassment, desire, and the advantage held by someone who can control what others hear. The screenplay by Patrick Ness and Christopher Ford touches these possibilities, then keeps returning to broadly drawn confrontations.

Tom Holland gives that idea its most persuasive use as Todd Hewitt, whose attempts to manage his own mind are both funny and uncomfortable. We felt for him when he repeated his name to keep his thoughts in check; the effort is small, recognisable and more affecting than the surrounding danger. His awkwardness needs little explanation, which becomes a problem when the Noise keeps supplying one. Doug Liman lets us read the embarrassment in the performance, then makes us listen to it as well.

Daisy Ridley gives Viola Eade a welcome directness, and the two leads have an ease together that briefly makes the journey seem worth taking. Their quieter exchanges allow us to notice another person instead of another effect. But Patrick Ness and Christopher Ford do not give Viola Eade enough of a life beyond the requirements of the adventure, leaving Daisy Ridley to suggest what the writing has not supplied. Mads Mikkelsen makes Mayor David Prentiss compelling through sheer presence, though the surrounding conflicts give him too little to complicate.

The horseback sequence offers a glimpse of a more distinctive film, with Noise trailing behind the riders as they move. Ben Seresin’s cinematography has something useful to work with here: we can see the thoughts moving through the landscape with the people thinking them. For a moment, the effect belongs in the action. Dan Weil’s production design is less successful at making this way of living feel convincing; we get too little sense of how constant exposure might change ordinary life.

Doc Crotzer’s editing keeps the story moving, but gives its relationships too little room to develop. At 109 minutes, the film is not long, yet its haste makes the action feel less urgent because there is so little reason to worry about the people involved. The score by Marco Beltrami and Brandon Roberts adds urgency without making the danger feel personal. With thoughts already crowding the soundtrack, the action has plenty of noise and too little suspense.

The larger difficulty is that Doug Liman cannot settle on how seriously to take the Noise. Jokes about unwanted thoughts sit awkwardly beside suggestions of male rage and coercion, and the film moves on before those subjects become uncomfortable. As a young-adult dystopian adventure, it has a chance to make the familiar business of growing up under hostile authority feel newly invasive. Instead, too many encounters could belong to any story about young people facing powerful adults, once the effects were switched off.

We wanted more time with the two leads and fewer scenes telling us what Tom Holland had already made clear. There is enough warmth between them to keep the film from becoming a complete chore, and enough invention to make its waste frustrating. If the premise appeals, be prepared for an adventure much less curious about it than we were.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

45
Positive
2
Mixed
10
Negative
11

Most critics find Chaos Walking a disappointing adaptation, with a promising science-fiction premise reduced to a muddled, familiar young-adult adventure. Praise clusters around Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley: their charisma and chemistry make the central relationship more engaging than the thin characterisation might suggest. Several reviews also find worthwhile ideas in the audible-thoughts concept, particularly its potential to explore male rage, desire and control, though few think these receive enough attention.

The sharpest disagreement concerns the Noise itself, which some find inventive and others confusing, repetitive or an obstacle to storytelling. The AV Club sees it as an engine for a bumpy but engaging adventure, while Polygon finds enough pleasure in the leads and Doug Liman’s energetic direction to forgive the jumbled story. Those warmer responses sit apart from a largely mixed-to-negative consensus, with recurring complaints about uncertain tone, weak stakes and underdeveloped themes.

The AV Club
4 March 2021 · B- · A.A. Dowd
70

Dowd finds the adventure bumpy but says its clever sci-fi premise gives it an inventive engine. The review especially praises the Noise concept and the leads’ likable chemistry.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 March 2021 · Tim Grierson
64*

Screen identifies this as a review of Doug Liman’s film, but the accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The paywalled text also prevents identifying what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 March 2021
64*

The page could not be read, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be confirmed. The URL indicates a review of the named film.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 June 2021 · Eurico de Barros
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its article text is unavailable. No critical verdict or specific praise or complaint can be established from the supplied content.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
3 March 2021 · C- · David Ehrlich
50

Ehrlich finds the adaptation dull and compromised, flattening its unusual premise into a generic YA action film. He singles out the horseback sequence, with the characters’ Noise trailing behind them, as a glimpse of the genre-mashing film it might have been.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 March 2021 · Kevin Crust
50*

Crust finds the film watchable and engaging in places, but neither a disaster nor the exciting franchise launch it might have been. He praises the inventive Noise concept while criticizing how its cacophony overwhelms the storytelling and diminishes subtext.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Chaos Walking worth watching?
Chaos Walking is difficult to recommend despite its appealing leads and thought-sharing premise; we score it 44 out of 100. Tom Holland makes Todd’s public embarrassment funny and affecting, but the hurried adventure gives its relationships too little room and its danger too little weight. It offers some warmth for those especially drawn to the idea.
How long is Chaos Walking, and what is it rated?
Chaos Walking runs 1h 49m. It is a fantasy and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Chaos Walking in India?
Chaos Walking is streaming on Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in India, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from ₹119.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Chaos Walking, and is it suitable for children?
Chaos Walking has a UK 12 certificate, so it is not a choice for younger children. Its adventure includes danger and confrontations, while suggestions of male rage and coercion sit alongside jokes about embarrassing thoughts. We find it short on suspense, but that does not establish how comfortable a sensitive child will be with its content.
How does Chaos Walking compare to The City of Lost Children?
Chaos Walking is the weaker choice beside The City of Lost Children, which we recommend for its stranger, more fully imagined world and touching central partnership. Both offer speculative ideas and companionship, but the stolen dreams and black humour of The City of Lost Children receive more inventive treatment. Its crowded storytelling does, however, require a tolerance for occasional confusion.
Is Chaos Walking based on a true story or a book?
Chaos Walking is based on a novel by Patrick Ness, rather than a true story, and Ness also co-writes the screenplay with Christopher Ford. We cannot assess its faithfulness to the book here, but the film explains its central thought-sharing premise without requiring prior reading; our frustration is how little the adventure does with that idea.
What should I watch after Chaos Walking?
After Chaos Walking, try The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78): Stolen dreams and unlikely companions inhabit a stranger, more fully imagined world. Then Akira (1988, Fi1m 83): Adolescent anger becomes a public danger, with consequences the film takes seriously.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Prospect (2018) · not on Fi1m yetA hostile science-fiction frontier where the central relationship earns its moments of trust.

  2. The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78)Stolen dreams and unlikely companions inhabit a stranger, more fully imagined world.

  3. Akira (1988, Fi1m 83)Adolescent anger becomes a public danger, with consequences the film takes seriously.

  4. Midnight Special (2016) · not on Fi1m yetAn unusual child, a pursuit, and adults whose concern gives the danger weight.

  5. The Innocents (2021) · not on Fi1m yetA harsher story of children with psychic powers, attentive to cruelty and responsibility.

Chaos Walking (2021) review: good leads trapped in a thin story (India) | Fi1m