Marcello (Marcello Fonte) stands outside the Dogman grooming shop in a deserted coastal district
Film review

Dogman

2018 · Directed by Matteo Garrone · 1h 43m

In a sentenceThe dog groomer could do with being shown some loyalty himself

In a run-down seaside town in Campania, Marcello (Marcello Fonte) works as a dog groomer among bleak beaches and derelict buildings. His bond with the dogs reveals a gentleness that offers little protection from Simoncino (Edoardo Pesce), a frightening presence to whom he remains attached. Marcello wants to preserve that friendship, even as its demands leave him outmatched. Simoncino’s Mother (Nunzia Schiano) is among the people in their small community. Marcello has to contend with a man whose violence makes loyalty a dangerous habit, in surroundings where kindness provides no reliable defence.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Matteo Garrone’s Dogman is a grim, affecting crime drama with a tender performance from Marcello Fonte. The story leans too heavily on its bully, but the uneasy bond between its two men makes the cruelty difficult to watch.

Matteo Garrone’s Dogman is a good, uncomfortable crime film about remaining attached to someone who frightens you. Marcello, a dog groomer in a decaying seaside town, has an affection for Simoncino that makes his life harder to bear. The film watches that attachment closely enough for us to feel its pull, even when we struggle to believe it. Its main weakness is the limited attention it gives to what keeps the bully bullying.

Marcello Fonte gives Marcello a tenderness that survives the story’s rough treatment of him. His affection for the dogs is essential: it lets us see him being capable and caring, rather than simply waiting to be hurt. We were moved by that care, because it makes his tolerance of Simoncino’s intimidation so difficult to watch. There is gentle humour in this man and his work, and Matteo Garrone is sensible enough to let us enjoy it.

Edoardo Pesce makes Simoncino frightening enough to explain why Marcello might submit to him, though the continued loyalty is harder to account for. Their physical contrast does considerable work, allowing an unequal relationship to register without much explanation. Yet Simoncino is drawn so narrowly that we begin to see what each encounter will require of him. The writing by Ugo Chiti, Massimo Gaudioso and Matteo Garrone needs more from this man than menace, however forcefully the actor supplies it.

Nicolaj Brüel’s cinematography makes the bleak beaches and derelict buildings worth looking at without making them inviting. We can understand the attraction of these images while still feeling how dispiriting it would be to live among them. Dimitri Capuani’s production design makes those battered surroundings feel inhabited, which matters when the story is so close to a fable. The place contributes to our sense of Marcello having few comfortable alternatives, although the repeated bleakness can become a little insistent.

Marco Spoletini’s editing keeps the pressure on the central relationship, and the pared-down dialogue gives the actors room to carry it. That concentration suits a story in which a small shift in behaviour can matter more than a lengthy explanation. Michele Braga’s music helps sustain the discomfort, but the tension between the two performances remains the stronger draw. At 103 minutes, the film has room for those exchanges without requiring a sprawling account of the town around them.

The comparison between the dogs and the men can also become heavy-handed. Marcello’s ease with animals and his helplessness around Simoncino make the point clearly enough without our needing to keep returning to it. As a crime fable, Dogman sometimes presses that comparison too hard, and the people risk becoming illustrations of a lesson already understood. Marcello Fonte keeps bringing us back to an individual whose affection and poor judgement can occupy the same face.

This is a stronger choice for an evening of uneasy character drama than for anyone seeking the pleasures of a brisk thriller. Its compassion is what makes the violence difficult to sit with, and the humour offers only limited relief. There is enough human interest here to justify the discomfort, even when the story makes its point too firmly. Save it for an evening when neither of you needs cheering up.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
15
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics find Dogman a gripping, bleak crime fable, with praise centred on Marcello Fonte’s tender, nuanced performance as a downtrodden dog groomer. His pairing with Edoardo Pesce gives the film much of its tension, drawing on their physical contrast and uneasy exchanges. The reviews also admire Matteo Garrone’s depiction of a decaying seaside town, where the cinematography finds beauty without softening the desolation. Several welcome the compassion and gentle humour that interrupt the brutality.

The spread is wide, with even favourable reviews questioning the story’s credibility or finding its allegory heavy-handed. Fonte’s performance earns praise across the divide, but the characterisation and plotting prove more contentious. Variety finds the central character’s development emotionally unconvincing, despite admiring Fonte’s work. Eye for Film likewise praises his nuance but objects to his character’s implausible loyalty and the one-note portrayal of his intimidating companion; elsewhere, reservations concern predictability, thin character development and laboured metaphor.

The Guardian
17 May 2018 · ★★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
100

Bradshaw finds the film a compelling, harrowing portrait of criminal dependency, delivered with comic flair. He particularly praises its tragicomic scenes and Garrone’s vivid depiction of Marcello’s bond with the dogs.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 May 2018 · festival review · Deborah Young
90*

The critic praises the film as an intensely gripping culmination of Matteo Garrone’s dark themes. She singles out its superb lead performances and evocative cinematography for praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 April 2019 · Robert Abele
80*

The critic finds the crime fable potent and affecting, though parts of its story strain credibility. He singles out Marcello Fonte’s performance and the vivid portrayal of the desolate seaside town for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

Johnston’s four-star rating indicates a favorable verdict. He frames the film as a blend of social exposé and modern fable.

Read the full review →
Time Out
17 May 2018 · ★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
80

The critic calls the film a well-crafted gem. They praise its intimate parable of a downtrodden dog groomer.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 May 2018 · festival review · Jamie Graham
75*

Graham views the film as a compassionate, compelling crime story whose descent into ruin feels both authentic and inexorable. He especially praises its compassion for its flawed protagonist and its beauty amid bleak beaches and derelict buildings.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Dogman worth watching?
Dogman is worth watching for its tender central performance and uneasy character drama, and we score it 78 out of 100. We find Marcello Fonte’s care for the dogs affecting enough to make the intimidation he tolerates painful to watch, though the bully is thinly drawn. It suits an appetite for grim drama rather than a brisk thriller.
How long is Dogman, and what is it rated?
Dogman runs 1h 43m. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch Dogman in Singapore?
Dogman is not on any streaming or rental service in Singapore at the moment. It is available in 23 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Dogman, and is it suitable for children?
Dogman has a UK 15 certificate and contains violence and frightening intimidation, making it unsuitable for children under 15. We find the cruelty difficult to watch because the film makes us care about the gentle man enduring it. Squeamish viewers should approach with caution, and the occasional gentle humour offers only limited relief.
How does Dogman compare to Bicycle Thieves?
Dogman is the harsher companion to Bicycle Thieves, which earns our warmer recommendation for its moving father-son performances. Both concern precarious livelihoods and ordinary kindness under pressure, but Dogman concentrates on a frightening, unequal friendship and sometimes labours its point. We favour Bicycle Thieves for moving human drama, and Dogman for an evening of sustained unease.
What should I watch after Dogman?
After Dogman, try Bicycle Thieves (1948, Fi1m 93): Another precarious livelihood, with ordinary kindness under pressure from poverty. Then The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89): For another close study of dependency, resentment and unequal power; and A Prophet (2009, Fi1m 86): A harsher criminal education, with dependence and intimidation shaping every choice.

Cast

Awards

David di Donatello for Best Director, 2019

Won
David di Donatello for Best Director

David di Donatello for Best Film, 2019

Won
David di Donatello for Best Film

European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film, 2019

Nominated
European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 2019

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

Cannes Film Festival, 2018

Nominated
Palme d'Or

European Film Award for Best Actor, 2018

Won
European Film Award for Best Actor

European Film Award for Best Costume Designer, 2018

Won
European Film Award for Best Costume Designer

European Film Award for Best Director, 2018

Nominated
European Film Award for Best Director

European Film Award for Best Film, 2018

Nominated
European Film Award for Best Film

European Film Award for Best Hair and Makeup Artist, 2018

Won
European Film Award for Best Hair and Makeup Artist

European Film Award for Best Screenwriter, 2018

Nominated
European Film Award for Best Screenwriter

If you liked this, try…

  1. Bicycle Thieves (1948, Fi1m 93)Another precarious livelihood, with ordinary kindness under pressure from poverty.

  2. The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89)For another close study of dependency, resentment and unequal power.

  3. A Prophet (2009, Fi1m 86)A harsher criminal education, with dependence and intimidation shaping every choice.

  4. Tyrannosaur (2011, Fi1m 81)For tenderness surviving beside violence, without any promise of easy comfort.

  5. Shoplifters (2018, Fi1m 89)Another compassionate look at people whose affection outlasts their questionable decisions.