Fletch and Gail crouch beside an armchair, peering toward a sports bag
Film review

Fletch

1985 · Directed by Michael Ritchie · 1h 38m

In a sentenceChevy Chase changes identities without changing his expression, and gets away with it more often than he should

Irwin ‘Fletch’ Fletcher (Chevy Chase) moves between assumed identities as two plots become entangled. Alan Stanwyk (Tim Matheson), Gail Stanwyk (Dana Wheeler-Nicholson) and Chief Jerry Karlin (Joe Don Baker) figure in the mystery, alongside Larry (Geena Davis) and Frank Walker (Richard Libertini). Fletch adopts one character after another, using a succession of impersonations, one-liners and non sequiturs in his dealings with the people around him. The two strands develop together while Fletch keeps presenting himself as somebody else.

Fi1m review

Fletch is worth an evening for Chevy Chase’s dry delivery and Geena Davis’s warmth. The mystery holds together, but slack pacing and a streak of smugness keep the comedy from being consistently good company.

Michael Ritchie’s Fletch is a good comedy with an adequate mystery attached, and it is worth an evening if Chevy Chase’s dry delivery appeals. The attraction is a man who changes identities while remaining recognisably, sometimes stubbornly, himself. The film enjoys giving him fresh opportunities to talk, and several of its funniest moments depend on how little effort he seems to make. It runs 98 minutes, although the slower passages make it feel longer.

Andrew Bergman’s screenplay, adapted from the novel by Gregory McDonald, fits two plots together neatly enough to keep the mystery intelligible. The individual stretches are less reliable, particularly when the film has to sustain interest between jokes. We found ourselves waiting for the next offhand answer rather than the next piece of information. That is a weakness in a crime story, but the dialogue is sufficiently funny to make it a tolerable one.

Chevy Chase makes the one-liners sound as though they have occurred to him a second before he says them. He gives the non sequiturs no special emphasis, trusting us to notice how little they belong in the conversation. We laughed at the identity changes because he carries that casual manner into each fresh impersonation, as though inventing another person were scarcely worth the trouble. The condescending streak is less appealing: sometimes the joke depends too heavily on everyone else seeming slow.

Geena Davis, as Larry, brings a welcome warmth, and her sunny presence makes the film easier company. We would happily exchange a few of the weaker jokes for more of her. The supporting cast gives Michael Ritchie something solid to work with, but he keeps returning to his leading man’s ability to talk his way through a scene. When that manner gives way to broader panic, the performance becomes strained and the comedy less certain.

Fred Schuler’s cinematography is unobtrusive, although we rarely found ourselves interested in looking beyond the performer. Boris Leven’s production design is similarly undemanding, giving the comedy somewhere to happen without supplying much pleasure of its own. Neither contribution distracts from the delivery, which is useful in a film so dependent on it. Still, a comic mystery ought to offer something worth looking at when the jokes pause, and we missed that here.

Richard A. Harris’s editing has to accommodate an unhurried comic style while keeping the mystery moving, and the balance is uneven. There are passages when a dry pause begins to feel merely slow. Harold Faltermeyer’s music is agreeable company, but it cannot make those stretches seem any shorter. A more decisive pace might have helped the weaker material, though some of the jokes would fall flat however briskly the film arrived at them.

The pleasures here are familiar ones for a mystery-comedy: a resourceful central character, tangled business and dialogue that makes the detours worthwhile. There is enough of each to forgive the occasional lull, especially when an apparently disposable remark turns out to be the funniest thing in a scene. We would recommend it to anyone who enjoys that loose, conversational approach to crime. For an evening that depends on being gripped by the case, choose something else.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Fletch, with praise clustering around Chevy Chase’s comic performance. His delivery, resourceful character changes and handling of witty situations give the more favourable critics enough to enjoy despite the film’s flaws. The humour is appreciated for its dry, smart manner, while the mystery-comedy remains broadly entertaining. Geena Davis also draws praise, including from a review that has little enthusiasm for the film itself.

The disagreement centres on Chase and how well the story holds together. Some critics accept structural rough spots and jokes that fall flat; others find the plotting routine or detect a condescending streak. Time Out credits the neat interweaving of the two plots. Empire is the clear negative dissent in a fairly wide spread, finding Chase miscast and the pacing sluggish, though it praises Davis and the supporting cast.

The Hollywood Reporter
16 May 1985 · Duane Byrge
85*

The review finds Fletch an amusing, breezy comedy that succeeds despite structural rough spots. It singles out Chevy Chase’s performance and the witty situations as the film’s main strengths.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
31 May 1985 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert gives the comedy a positive assessment, finding it an entertaining showcase for Chevy Chase. He singles out Chase’s comic performance as the film’s main strength.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
31 May 1985 · Sheila Benson
65*

Benson calls the film good but not great, finding it smart, dry and funny despite flaws and a condescending streak. She especially praises Chase’s resourceful character changes and Geena Davis’s sunny performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DO
60*

The review appears mildly positive about the film. It singles out how the two otherwise routine plots are neatly interwoven.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 May 2006 · Kim Newman
30*

Newman finds the adaptation bland and below its reputation. He praises the supporting cast and Geena Davis, while faulting Chevy Chase’s miscasting and the film’s sluggish pacing.

Read the full review →
Collider
22 May 2009 · Andre Dellamorte
75*

Dellamorte finds Fletch an entertaining mystery-comedy and calls it Chevy Chase’s best film, though some jokes and moments of panic fall flat. He especially praises Chase’s delivery of one-liners and non sequiturs.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Fletch worth watching?
Fletch is worth watching if Chevy Chase’s dry delivery appeals, and we score it 71 out of 100. His casual impersonations and Geena Davis’s warmth make this good company for a relaxed evening, though slack pacing and occasional smugness mean we recommend it more for the jokes than the mystery.
How long is Fletch, and what is it rated?
Fletch runs 1h 38m. It is a comedy and crime film.
Where can I watch Fletch in Argentina?
Fletch is not on any streaming or rental service in Argentina at the moment. It is available in 17 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Fletch, and is it suitable for children?
Fletch has a UK PG certificate, which indicates parental guidance rather than suitability for every child. The certificate allows for some material that may concern younger or more sensitive children; we cannot give a more specific assurance about violence or frightening moments from the rating alone.
How does Fletch compare to The Thin Man?
Fletch is the less companionable choice beside The Thin Man: its dry comedy rests largely on one man’s impersonations rather than a couple’s pleasure in each other. We prefer The Thin Man for that warmth, though neither film’s chief attraction is its mystery; Fletch suits anyone especially fond of Chase’s offhand delivery.
Is Fletch based on a true story or a book?
Fletch is adapted from a novel by Gregory McDonald, rather than presented as a true story. Andrew Bergman’s screenplay keeps its two plots intelligible without requiring familiarity with the book, though we find the dialogue more engaging than the case; we make no claim about how faithfully it follows the novel.
What should I watch after Fletch?
After Fletch, try The Thin Man (1934, Fi1m 84): A companionable murder mystery with dry exchanges and plenty of room for digression. Then The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86): Another investigator whose conversational habits make the detours as rewarding as the case; and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005, Fi1m 79): A sharper, nastier collision of crime plotting and people who cannot stop talking.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Thin Man (1934, Fi1m 84)A companionable murder mystery with dry exchanges and plenty of room for digression.

  2. The Tall Blond Man with One Black Shoe (1972) · not reviewed yetMistaken identity drives this French farce, with a less self-satisfied comic touch.

  3. The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86)Another investigator whose conversational habits make the detours as rewarding as the case.

  4. Zero Effect (1998) · not reviewed yetAn eccentric detective comedy that gives its awkwardness more emotional consequence.

  5. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005, Fi1m 79)A sharper, nastier collision of crime plotting and people who cannot stop talking.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever