Godzilla towers over buildings engulfed in flames
Film review

Godzilla 2000: Millennium

1999 · Directed by Takao Okawara · 1h 47m

In a sentenceThe monster has an orange flame, a fresh coat of spikes and more motivation than anyone in a suit

Nemuro, Hokkaido, on a stormy night. Yuji Shinoda (Takehiro Murata) runs the Godzilla Prediction Network from a van, with his daughter Io (Mayu Suzuki) keeping the accounts and a journalist, Yuki Ichinose (Naomi Nishida), along for a story. Godzilla comes ashore, flattens a lighthouse, drives his tail through a road tunnel and heads south. Shinoda wants to study the cells that let the creature heal from anything. Mitsuo Katagiri (Hiroshi Abe), head of the government’s Crisis Control Intelligence, wants it dead and has the army and a new armour-piercing missile to try. Katagiri’s team is also raising a huge rock from the floor of the Japan Trench, one that begins to move when sunlight reaches it, while Godzilla makes for the nuclear plant at Tokai.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Toho’s answer to the American Godzilla of 1998 gives the monster a new face and a proper night-time entrance, and gives the humans a plot about a rock that will not stay on the seabed. The creature earns his 107 minutes; the people do not.

Toho’s answer to the American Godzilla of 1998 was to start again. Godzilla 2000: Millennium throws out every sequel since the 1954 original, gives the monster a new face and puts him back where he belongs, in the rain, at night, walking through a Japanese town built to be broken. Takao Okawara, who directed several of the 1990s entries, knows exactly what the job is. The film he has made does that job well and does almost nothing else.

The opening at Nemuro is the best stretch. Yudai Kato lights it almost entirely with what would be there: the sweep of a lighthouse, a van’s headlamps, lightning. A row of dorsal fins slides through black water, the beam catches them, and we felt a jolt of pleasure we had not felt at one of these in years. Then the fins keep coming, and coming, and the lighthouse goes over. Takeshi Shimizu’s miniature streets are the right kind of shabby, wet tarmac and sagging power lines, and when the tail comes through the wall of a road tunnel the rubble looks heavy. We had not expected to feel much, and we were properly pleased.

The redesign helps. This Godzilla has a longer jaw, plates down his back that have grown jagged and tinted purple, and a breath that burns orange instead of blue, and in the dark he looks like a new animal rather than a refurbished one. Takayuki Hattori’s score gives him a heavy brass theme and mostly leaves the dialogue scenes alone, which is a kindness. Akira Ifukube’s march from the older films is held back for a long time and lands harder for it.

Then the people start talking. Hiroshi Kashiwabara and Wataru Mimura’s script has Yuji Shinoda (Takehiro Murata) run a shoestring Godzilla Prediction Network from a van, with his daughter Io (Mayu Suzuki) doing the books, and Mitsuo Katagiri (Hiroshi Abe) run the government’s Crisis Control Intelligence from a boardroom. One wants to study the creature’s cells, which heal from anything; the other wants to kill it. That is the whole of the argument, stated in the first twenty minutes and repeated in every scene the two men share. Murata is a pleasant, rumpled presence with nothing to play. Abe stands straight in good suits and glowers, and the film mistakes this for a character. Naomi Nishida’s journalist, Yuki Ichinose, shrieks, trips and drops things, and is meant to be funny.

The middle hour is given over to a rock. Katagiri’s people raise a huge meteorite from the Japan Trench, it begins to move once the sun hits it, and a great many men in a great many rooms explain what that might mean. We were bored, and then we were annoyed, because the monster was off screen for stretches long enough to forget the film’s title. When the thing does take to the air over Tokyo in daylight, the seams show: the object sits on the sky like a sticker, and the suit, so good in the wet dark, looks stiff under an ordinary noon. Yoshiyuki Okuhara cuts fast around the worst of it, and cuts the missile attack at the Tokai nuclear plant so that we always know where the helicopters are, which is more than most of these films manage.

The last half hour delivers what the first half hour promised: a fight in Shinjuku among glass towers, at night again, with buildings coming down in the right order. We will not describe what Godzilla is fighting. It is well staged and the outcome is never in doubt, which is the deal you accept when you sit down.

Against the 1954 film this is middling; the craft is in the creature and the miniatures and nowhere near the script. Against the American film it was made to answer, it wins easily, because it never treats the monster as an embarrassment. A dubbed and shortened version was prepared for American cinemas with jokes added; if you have a choice, take the Japanese one, with subtitles, at 107 minutes. Watch it with the lights off, and forgive it the boardrooms.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

1 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
0
The New York Times
18 August 2000
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint from the review can be reliably identified.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Godzilla 2000: Millennium worth watching?
Godzilla 2000: Millennium is worth watching for anyone who wants the monster done properly, at night, in the rain, and we scored it 63. The creature, the miniatures and the redesign are the point; the humans argue in boardrooms about a meteorite for a long middle hour, and the monster is off screen for stretches. Take the Japanese version with subtitles, not the shortened dub.
How long is Godzilla 2000: Millennium, and what is it rated?
Godzilla 2000: Millennium runs 1h 47m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Godzilla 2000: Millennium in Ukraine?
Godzilla 2000: Millennium is not on any streaming or rental service in Ukraine at the moment. It is available in 11 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Godzilla 2000: Millennium compare to Godzilla?
Godzilla 2000: Millennium is a monster showcase, while the 1954 Godzilla is a frightening film about loss, and the original is much the better of the two. The later film wins on creature design and night-time model-work but has a thin, repetitive script; the earlier one has stiff dialogue too, yet its destruction hurts. Start with 1954 if you want to be moved, with 2000 if you want a fight in Shinjuku.
What should I watch after Godzilla 2000: Millennium?
After Godzilla 2000: Millennium, try Godzilla (1954, Fi1m 88): The original, still the saddest and most serious thing the creature has done. Then Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74): The boardrooms this film skips through, made the actual point and made gripping; and Pacific Rim (2013, Fi1m 70): Del Toro’s love of the rubber-suit tradition, done with an enormous budget.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Godzilla (1954, Fi1m 88)The original, still the saddest and most serious thing the creature has done.

  2. Gamera 3: Revenge of Iris (1999) · not on Fi1m yetThe same year, the rival studio, and a far better script about a monster.

  3. Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74)The boardrooms this film skips through, made the actual point and made gripping.

  4. The Host (2006) · not on Fi1m yetBong Joon-ho’s Korean river monster, with a family worth rooting for.

  5. Pacific Rim (2013, Fi1m 70)Del Toro’s love of the rubber-suit tradition, done with an enormous budget.

Godzilla 2000: Millennium (1999) review: good monster, dull humans (Ukraine) | Fi1m