Film review

Gremlins

1984 · Directed by Joe Dante · 1h 46m · MPA PG

In a sentenceA Christmas present with a persuasive case for keeping the receipt

FantasyHorrorComedy

A mysterious creature bought as a Christmas present brings trouble to a small American town. There are rules to follow, and when they are broken, the gift produces gremlins whose behaviour has little to do with seasonal goodwill. As the town’s celebrations give way to creature attacks, the humans have to contend with what has been unleashed. Zach Galligan plays Billy Peltzer and Phoebe Cates plays Kate Beringer, with Hoyt Axton as Randall Peltzer and Frances Lee McCain as Lynn Peltzer. Joe Dante directs this mixture of fantasy, horror and comedy.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Joe Dante’s Gremlins is a funny, nasty Christmas horror comedy whose creatures deserve most of the attention they steal. The humans can seem underwritten, but the film’s delight in bad behaviour is difficult to resist.

Gremlins is funny, nasty and worth an evening for the pleasure Joe Dante takes in spoiling a wholesome Christmas. A mysterious creature is bought as a present, rules are broken and a small American town finds itself under attack from gremlins. Chris Columbus’s script makes the trouble feel avoidable by giving the gift conditions that require careful attention. For a while, we want the creature and understand the temptation. The early sweetness does useful work in preparing us for the nastiness.

Production designer James H. Spencer gives the mayhem a reassuring small-town setting, and the Christmas cheer is persuasive enough to make its disruption feel rude. John Hora’s cinematography helps establish that warmth without making the creatures look as though they belong in a different film. Their cuteness and their ugliness both survive being available for inspection. The effects work because the creatures are worth watching even before they do anything. Dante allows them more personality than several of the people around them.

Zach Galligan’s Billy Peltzer gives us a mild, approachable human centre, which is useful when the film starts testing our loyalties. Galligan does not compete with the creatures for attention, though the writing could have given him more to work with. Phoebe Cates, as Kate Beringer, makes a stronger impression when the film allows her to disturb its seasonal cheer. Her Christmas speech is a difficult change of mood, and she makes it count.

We laughed at the creatures’ attack on the town, then felt slightly ashamed of ourselves. Dante gives their destructiveness such energy that we briefly forget to worry about the people in their way. The creatures are funny because they appear to enjoy themselves without any interest in being forgiven. The violence has enough bite to make the laughter awkward, and Dante does not soften every unpleasant moment with a reassuring joke.

Tina Hirsch’s editing is especially useful in keeping the comic interruptions from stopping the threat altogether. There is room to register the creatures’ misbehaviour before the next burst of trouble, so the jokes remain legible. Jerry Goldsmith’s music gives that trouble a jaunty momentum, encouraging us to enjoy what we ought to deplore. The combination becomes less effective when the mayhem begins repeating itself. Once the rules have done their work, the script relies too often on another creature attack.

The other limitation is that Columbus gives the human story too little force once the creatures take charge. We need not like everybody in a horror comedy, but somebody’s predicament should matter beyond providing the next opportunity for a joke. Here, the human scenes can feel like waiting for the creatures to return. The film is better whenever a performer’s reaction gets as much attention as the effects, as Cates demonstrates when she has the opportunity.

As a horror comedy, though, Gremlins gets something important right: the monsters are entertaining enough to make us uneasy about enjoying them. Its treatment of Christmas gives the destruction a particular target, and the joke lasts beyond the initial shock of seeing seasonal cheer treated so badly. At 106 minutes, it accommodates a few indulgences without exhausting the pleasure of its creatures. See it for them, but take the 15 certificate seriously.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
5
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Gremlins, praising Joe Dante’s collision of small-town Christmas cheer with unruly black comedy. The praise centres on the creature effects, the jokes at the expense of familiar film conventions, and the willingness to disrupt a comforting picture of American life. For the more enthusiastic reviewers, the mixture of adorable creatures and spiteful humour is precisely what makes the film work, with its mischief giving the seasonal setting an unusual bite.

The reservations concern how reliably that mixture holds together: several reviews find the mayhem predictable, the humour uneven or the human characters underdeveloped. Others question the emotional impact and the aggression towards a young audience. The spread is wide, though none of the reviews is wholly negative: Digital Spy celebrates the sadistic comedy and consumer-culture satire, while Variety finds that the effects leave the humans with little to do.

Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This anarchic black comedy remains one of Hollywood's darkest mainstream hits, gleefully undermining feel-good depictions of small-town America through in-jokes, cameos and Phoebe Cates's memorable Christmas speech.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 December 2012 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The film skillfully walks the line between wholesome Christmas cheer and subversive mayhem, with Dante leaving audiences unsure whose side to take in the gremlins' chaotic assault on small-town America.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
8 June 1984 · Roger Ebert
75*

The film pits a wholesome small-town Christmas against mischievous, monstrous creatures in a witty B-movie style. Ebert praises the clever send-ups of movie clichés and the first half's cute gremlins but notes the second half turns nastier.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
18 June 1984 · Pauline Kael
55*

Dante delivers an unholy mix of whimsical pop shocker and movie references but struggles to cohere the ideas into something with emotional impact. Kael highlights inventive sequences like the theater rampage and kitchen battle while noting the overall affectless tone.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 June 1984 · Vincent Canby
50*

The creatures are the real stars, with the mogwai's unstable nature driving the plot in a mix of Capra-esque whimsy and grotesque horror. Canby finds the humor unreliable and the violence overly aggressive toward a young audience.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1983 · Variety Staff
45*

The story follows a mysterious creature bought as a Christmas gift that spawns evil, killer gremlins after rules are broken. The review notes the initial preciousness gives way to predictable mayhem with humans serving mainly as extras for the effects.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The 'Burbs poster

The 'Burbs

1989 · Another suspiciously comfortable neighbourhood, with Joe Dante encouraging everybody’s least reasonable instincts.

Attack the Block poster

Attack the Block

2011 · A creature siege with sharp comic timing and youngsters worth worrying about.

House poster

House

1977 · Domestic space becomes dangerous in a Japanese horror comedy with little restraint.

Krampus poster

Krampus

2015 · More Christmas creatures for anyone who finds enforced family cheer faintly threatening.

Tremors poster

Tremors

1990 · Small-town creature trouble, practical ingenuity and human company worth keeping through the siege.