Bea (Cailey Fleming) and Cal (Ryan Reynolds) ride a subway with imaginary friends
Film review

IF

2024 · Directed by John Krasinski · 1h 44m · IFRB All

In a sentenceSteve Carell is a purple creature the size of a sofa and the girl standing next to him walks off with the film

Bea (Cailey Fleming) moves into her grandmother’s flat while her father (John Krasinski) waits in hospital for an operation. She has decided she is too old for games. Then she starts seeing what nobody else can: the imaginary friends of children who have grown up and forgotten them. Upstairs lives Cal (Ryan Reynolds), who sees them too. With him she meets Blue (voiced by Steve Carell), a large purple creature, and Blossom (Phoebe Waller-Bridge), a cartoon with a butterfly’s face, and the three of them set out to find the forgotten friends new children. Fiona Shaw plays the grandmother, and Louis Gossett Jr. voices Lewis, an elderly bear. Written and directed by Krasinski.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

John Krasinski’s fantasy about abandoned imaginary friends is handsome, sincere and short on jokes, and it never settles what its own world is for. Cailey Fleming holds it together almost single-handed; the film around her keeps changing its mind.

John Krasinski has written and directed a family film about the imaginary friends children leave behind when they grow up, and where those friends go. IF is warmly shot, well cast and short on laughs, and its real trouble is that it never works out the rules of its own world. It runs 104 minutes and carries a U, and the adults in the cinema will be the ones fidgeting.

Bea (Cailey Fleming) arrives at her grandmother’s flat with her father in hospital and has decided she is finished with childish things. Fleming is the reason the film holds together. She plays Bea as a girl who has taught herself to be capable because nobody else is coping; when the script hands her a joke she plays it straight, and when it hands her grief she plays that straight too. Fiona Shaw, as the grandmother, is given too little to do.

The creatures are the film’s best work. Blue (Steve Carell) is a purple furry thing the size of a sofa who moves like a dog that knows it is about to be told off. Blossom (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) has a butterfly’s face and the flat look of a much older cartoon. Lewis (Louis Gossett Jr.) is an old bear who looks after the forgotten ones, and Gossett gives him a tiredness the script could not have written. When Blue sits on a bed the bed gives, and Janusz Kamiński lights the creatures with the same warm, late-afternoon glow he gives the flat. Jess Gonchor’s design for the friends’ home, a warren of rooms that change to suit whoever stands in them, is the one place the film’s imagination goes somewhere new.

Ryan Reynolds plays Cal, the neighbour upstairs who can see them too, and Krasinski has asked him to put away the smirk. He does, mostly, and what is left is a tired man scowling at cartoons. Several critics have called him miscast; we would say he is cast well and written thinly. Cal matches abandoned friends to new children and has no reason we can see for doing it, so Reynolds spends the film looking as if waiting to be told what he wants.

The comedy is left to Blue, who falls over things, and to Krasinski, who plays Bea’s father as a man who copes with a hospital ward by clowning in it. We saw what the clowning was for and did not laugh. The plot sets up its matchmaking scheme in the first half hour and then wanders off from it, and Christopher Rouse and Andy Canny cut the middle stretch as if hoping we would not notice how little happens. Past the hour we were bored, in a film with a purple monster in it. Michael Giacchino’s score is pretty and the film leans on it too hard, strings swelling under every soft moment before we have decided what we feel.

Then, late, it got us. There is a scene between Fleming and one of the older friends that we will not describe, and it moved us more than anything before it had earned. Fleming’s face does it, watching, saying almost nothing, and for a minute the film is what Krasinski wanted: a story about a child who grew up too fast being handed a little of her childhood back. It does not last.

The film invites comparison with Pixar and does not survive it. Toy Story (1995) and Inside Out (2015) each began with one rule about the inner life of children and never broke it. IF changes its rules whenever a scene needs it to: who can see the friends, what happens to them when they are forgotten, why any of it matters to Bea. Krasinski’s own A Quiet Place (2018) had one rule, stay silent, and kept it.

Take children under ten and they will like Blue and ask for him afterwards. Go as an adult and you will get one good scene, one good child actor and an hour of waiting for the film to make up its mind. It is a U, so it will frighten nobody. It may bore them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

57
Positive
6
Mixed
3
Negative
5

The reviews split almost evenly, and the spread is wide: four-star notices from The Telegraph and The Times sit alongside a D+ from The AV Club. Where critics agree is on Cailey Fleming, whose lead performance is picked out again and again for giving the story about grief and anxiety more feeling than the script supplies. The voice cast draws warm words, and The Telegraph admires the tactile creature designs.

The reservations cluster around the writing: most critics find the plot loose, overstuffed or meandering, and several call the film a live-action Pixar imitation that never matches its models. A recurring complaint is that the film cannot decide who it is for, too sombre for small children and too thin for adults; The AV Club goes further and argues Ryan Reynolds is miscast in a part better suited to Krasinski’s own earnestness. The warmest notices forgive the mess for the sincerity underneath; the coldest find the sincerity itself patronising.

The Telegraph
15 May 2024 · ★★★★ · Robbie Collin
80

This charming family fantasy is sweet and imaginative despite its corny premise, evoking older studio live-action films. It excels in its tactile creature designs and touching exploration of reconnecting with childhood comforts.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 May 2024 · Wendy Ide
70*

The film is a heartfelt but unremarkable kid-pleaser that borrows heavily from Pixar without matching its quality. It stands out for the engaging performance of young lead Cailey Fleming, who brings emotional depth to a story dealing with grief and anxiety.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 May 2024 · Kelechi Ehenulo
65*

Krasinski's film has charm and heartfelt whimsy thanks to Reynolds and Fleming's performances, but the overstuffed plot leaves too many questions and jokes fall flat.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
15 May 2024 · ★★★ · Kevin Harley
60

The film is a loosely plotted and derivative but occasionally playful family fantasy about loss and imaginary friends. Krasinski aims for a live-action Pixar feel but the story meanders, though it has flashes of charm and invention in places.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 May 2024 · D+ · Anna McKibbin
43

The film is an unwieldy Pixar-aping mess that is unsuitable for kids or adults, unsure of its target audience. The critic highlights the miscasting of Ryan Reynolds in a role better suited to Krasinski's earnest style and the story's failure to create a coherent imaginative world.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
15 May 2024 · Clint Worthington
40*

The film is a well-intentioned misfire, a kid’s movie without laughs and a parent’s movie without purpose. It features thin worldbuilding and sentimental plotting around imaginary friends who need new believers.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is IF worth watching?
IF is worth watching only for families with children under ten, and we scored it 56. John Krasinski's fantasy about forgotten imaginary friends is warmly shot and well cast, with Cailey Fleming holding it together, but it is short on jokes and keeps changing the rules of its own world. Adults will get one good scene and an hour of waiting.
How long is IF, and what is it rated?
IF runs 1h 44m and is rated All by the IFRB in Israel. It is a comedy and fantasy film.
Where can I watch IF in Israel?
IF is streaming on Netflix in Israel. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does IF compare to My Neighbor Totoro?
IF is the weaker film beside My Neighbor Totoro, though both put a big soft creature, a child and a parent in hospital at their centre. Miyazaki's film has one idea and the patience to sit with it; Krasinski's changes its mind about who can see the friends and why any of it matters. Children will enjoy either, but adults should choose Totoro.
What should I watch after IF?
After IF, try My Neighbour Totoro (1988, Fi1m 89): A big soft creature, two sisters and a mother in hospital, done with patience. Then Paddington (2014, Fi1m 84): The live-action family film with a furry lead that actually gets the jokes right; and Inside Out (2015, Fi1m 87): Pixar’s rulebook for a child’s inner life, kept from first scene to last.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. My Neighbour Totoro (1988, Fi1m 89)A big soft creature, two sisters and a mother in hospital, done with patience.

  2. Paddington (2014, Fi1m 84)The live-action family film with a furry lead that actually gets the jokes right.

  3. Inside Out (2015, Fi1m 87)Pixar’s rulebook for a child’s inner life, kept from first scene to last.

  4. Where the Wild Things Are (2009, Fi1m 80)Spike Jonze’s monsters are sadder and stranger, and the boy is allowed to be angry.

  5. A Monster Calls (2016) · not reviewed yetA grieving child, a tree that talks, and a film that never flinches.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever