Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) rides a motorcycle above an elevated roadway at sunset
Film review

Incredibles 2

2018 · Directed by Brad Bird · 1h 58m · KMRB ALL

In a sentenceThe baby has superpowers, which seems an unreasonable addition to the usual childcare arrangements

Helen Parr / Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) takes the lead in the family’s superhero work while Bob Parr / Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) takes charge at home. His job is to keep the household running, which means caring for Violet Parr (Sarah Vowell), Dashiell ‘Dash’ Parr (Huck Milner) and baby Jack-Jack Parr (Eli Fucile). Bob wants to manage without Helen, but each child brings demands he has to learn to handle. Helen faces superhero emergencies while the new division of labour puts Bob’s parenting to the test. Jack-Jack’s powers make the childcare more complicated still.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Brad Bird makes a funny, deftly staged family adventure whose parenting troubles are more engaging than its villain. The familiar plotting is a limitation, but Holly Hunter and the physical comedy keep it lively.

Brad Bird gives Incredibles 2 a useful change of routine: Helen takes on the superhero work and Bob looks after the children. The pleasure comes from watching people who already know each other discover how much they have underestimated each other’s jobs. It is a funny, assured family adventure, and we recommend it with a warning about the familiar villain plot. Bird, who also writes, is much better at making the domestic arrangement awkward than at making the danger surprising.

Holly Hunter gives Helen warmth, impatience and an audible enjoyment of the superhero work. She sounds pleased to get on with the job, and avoids turning every line into a declaration of independence. Craig T. Nelson makes Bob’s difficulties at home funny without making the children seem like punishment. His heroic confidence is poorly suited to the childcare, but Nelson keeps enough affection in his voice for Bob’s efforts to remain endearing even when the joke is familiar.

Mahyar Abousaeedi and Erik Smitt’s cinematography makes the action easy to follow, even when Helen’s body is doing things that would defeat a live-action stunt team. The runaway-monorail rescue is a good example: the pleasure lies in following her changing solutions to a clear physical problem. Bird builds the scene around what Helen can do, and her movements keep producing ideas. Stephen Schaffer’s editing gives each manoeuvre enough time to register before moving to the next.

Ralph Eggleston’s production design gives the movement a clean, retro-modernist setting. The surroundings have enough character to remain interesting when nobody is saving anybody, which matters in a film that spends so much time with a family. Michael Giacchino’s music keeps the action buoyant, although it makes less of an impression than the images it accompanies. The visual style also helps hold the domestic comedy and the superhero rescues together, without making either feel as though it belongs in a different film.

Jack-Jack’s encounter with a raccoon shows how well Bird can organise a gag. We laughed aloud at it: a baby and a raccoon make a welcome change from adults taking superhero business seriously. Bird allows the ridiculous situation to develop before adding another complication, and knows when to stop explaining and let the movement carry the joke. The sequence needs no help from the larger plot, and its small scale makes the care taken over it especially pleasing.

Bird’s writing is less inventive once the villain plot takes over, and the predictable turns keep the film from being as satisfying as its action. The ideas about family duties can also arrive with more explanation than the scenes need, as though we might otherwise miss the point of Bob’s difficulties. By superhero standards, though, such clear staging and such pleasure in physical movement remain worth having. At 118 minutes, it could stand a trim, particularly where the story insists on explaining itself. We would choose it for a family evening, provided nobody is expecting the villain to be the main attraction.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
23
Mixed
6
Negative
0

Most critics welcome Incredibles 2 as a funny, energetic sequel, with praise clustering around its inventive animation, clearly staged action and recognisable family tensions. Elastigirl’s superhero work and Mr. Incredible’s childcare duties give the role reversal both comic and dramatic value. Jack-Jack’s chaotic powers are a recurring favourite, particularly the raccoon sequence, whose physical comedy appeals even to reviewers with reservations elsewhere. The retro design and sharp dialogue also draw approval.

The main division concerns how much the sequel adds to the original. The Guardian finds it superior, while Variety sees an entertaining but formulaic replay with too little emotional impact. Between those positions, reservations centre on familiar plotting, a weak villain and ideas that receive less attention than the action. The spread runs from enthusiasm to mixed approval rather than outright rejection: even the less persuaded critics generally find something to enjoy in the family scenes and visual invention.

The Guardian
15 July 2018 · Mark Kermode
95*

Kermode says the sequel surpasses the original and wins him over. He especially praises Jack-Jack’s slapstick, calling its physical gags brilliantly executed and uproariously funny.

Read the full review →
Vulture
11 June 2018 · David Edelstein
90*

Edelstein finds Incredibles 2 delightful and praises Brad Bird’s stylish, nimble superhero filmmaking. He especially singles out the Jack-Jack and raccoon slapstick sequence for its comic timing.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
13 June 2018 · ★★★½/4 · Brian Tallerico
88

Tallerico gives the sequel a positive verdict, finding it worth the long wait. He singles out its inventive animation and family dynamics for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 June 2018 · B+ · David Ehrlich
83

Ehrlich finds the sequel rocky at first but ultimately great, praising its character-driven action and its blend of family life with superhero spectacle. He especially singles out Holly Hunter’s soulful performance and the exhilarating action sequences.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
13 July 2018 · ★★★★ · Matthew Norman
80

Norman finds the sequel witty and charming, with its gender-role reversal giving the superhero story a fresh angle. He especially praises Brad Bird’s smart, funny script and the comic moments involving Jack-Jack.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 June 2018 · Kenneth Turan
80*

Turan finds the sequel sparkling and crowd-pleasing, though it lacks the original’s shock of novelty. He especially praises the returning blend of sharp dialogue, comic adventure, and believable family dynamics.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Incredibles 2 worth watching?
Incredibles 2 is worth watching for its funny family dynamics and clearly staged superhero action, and we score it 80 out of 100. We recommend it for a family evening, especially for Jack-Jack’s physical comedy and Holly Hunter’s lively Helen, though the predictable villain plot and unnecessary explanations make it longer than it needs to be.
How long is Incredibles 2, and what is it rated?
Incredibles 2 runs 1h 58m and is rated ALL by the KMRB in South Korea. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Incredibles 2 in South Korea?
Incredibles 2 is streaming on Disney+ in South Korea, and it is also available to buy from Apple TV from ₩7,500. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Incredibles 2 compare to The Iron Giant?
Incredibles 2 offers lively superhero rescues and parenting comedy, while The Iron Giant finds humour, tenderness and danger in a boy’s friendship with a robot. We favour The Iron Giant for emotional involvement, despite its sometimes oversimplified adults; Incredibles 2 suits a family evening built around physical comedy, though its villain plot is less satisfying than its domestic troubles.
What should I watch after Incredibles 2?
After Incredibles 2, try The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): Brad Bird finds warmth and danger in another child’s unusual companion. Then Monsieur Hulot's Holiday (1953, Fi1m 86): Physical comedy built from patient observation and movements worth watching closely; and Wolf Children (2012, Fi1m 81): Unusual children make parenting difficult in this quieter, more sorrowful animation.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2019

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 2018

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

BAFTA Film Awards, 2018

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

Critics' Choice Awards, 2018

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)Brad Bird finds warmth and danger in another child’s unusual companion.

  2. Monsieur Hulot's Holiday (1953, Fi1m 86)Physical comedy built from patient observation and movements worth watching closely.

  3. Wolf Children (2012, Fi1m 81)Unusual children make parenting difficult in this quieter, more sorrowful animation.

  4. The Castle (1997) · not reviewed yetA family’s stubborn affection supplies the comedy, without anyone needing superpowers.

  5. The Mitchells vs. the Machines (2021, Fi1m 76)More family friction and inventive action, with considerably less restraint.