Film review

Insidious: Out of the Further

2026 · Directed by Jacob Chase · 1h 46m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA haunted pillow fort, some horrible dentistry and rather too much supernatural administration

HorrorThriller

Gemma Hall (Amelia Eve) and Maya Hall (Island Austin) face supernatural trouble in a mother-and-daughter story involving the Further. Family trauma accompanies the haunting, while demons turn familiar places into threatening ones. A dental office and a pillow fort become settings for early encounters with horror. Lin Shaye plays psychic medium Elise Rainier, with Sam Spruell as Cyrus Lam, Brandon Perea as Nick Mendoza and Maisie Richardson-Sellers as Clare. The film introduces a largely new group of characters to the series’ supernatural dangers.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jacob Chase gets useful scares from sofa cushions and dental work, but Insidious: Out of the Further cannot keep its family story moving. Amelia Eve deserves more than another round of supernatural explanations.

Insidious: Out of the Further has two useful ideas for a horror film: make a pillow fort frightening, and make a dental appointment worse. Jacob Chase finds enough in those situations to give this uneven ghost story a few proper scares. The trouble is everything required to connect them, especially the explanations that slow an already familiar story. Bringing in a largely new set of characters ought to give the haunting a fresh start, but the film spends too much time on supernatural rules to make their troubles matter.

The mother-and-daughter story gives Chase’s screenplay a reason to care about who is being frightened. Amelia Eve, playing Gemma Hall, supplies more feeling than the plotting earns, and the family material occasionally makes the danger feel personal. Yet the connection between inherited trauma and the haunting remains underdeveloped. We need time with these people, and too often we get another explanation of what the Further can do instead. Lin Shaye is a reassuring presence as Elise Rainier.

The pillow fort is where the film earns our attention. Nick Bassett’s production design turns sofa cushions into a labyrinth, and Dave Garbett’s cinematography makes those confined spaces oppressive enough to overcome the absurdity of being frightened by upholstery. We felt trapped during that sequence, because the soft barriers offer none of the reassurance they should. Chase understands how quickly a childhood refuge can become unpleasant when there seems to be no easy way through.

The dental horror works for a similarly simple reason. There is little persuasion required to make that setting uncomfortable, and Chase does not waste the opportunity. The sound design gives these scenes a physical unpleasantness that the more crowded supernatural material struggles to match. Joseph Bishara’s music helps the shocks land, and the combined effect is properly nasty.

Anna Rottke and Gregory Plotkin’s editing is surer within the set pieces than across the film. There is care in the timing of individual shocks, followed by a middle stretch that seems to take longer than it should to reach the next one. At 106 minutes, this ought not to feel so sluggish. Chase’s screenplay keeps asking us to absorb more information, and the later complications leave us struggling to care about who is in danger.

The demons are a problem, too. Their costumed appearance can be amusing, and there is room in this sort of horror for something cheerfully ridiculous. Here, though, their sheer number reduces the intimacy that the family scenes need. The effects are too unconvincing to make us worry much about what these creatures might do.

For a haunted-house film, predictability need not be fatal: there is plenty of fear in knowing what might be waiting beyond a familiar door. Chase is inventive enough with the furnishings to suggest he could have sustained something leaner. The series’ appetite for explanation gets in his way. Give this a miss unless a few carefully arranged shocks are enough to carry an evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

52
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
6

The reviews are divided, with a slight lean towards disappointment rather than a clear rejection. Praise clusters around individual scares: dental horror and a claustrophobic pillow-fort maze recur as examples of invention even in otherwise unfavourable notices. Several critics find enough energy in the set pieces to enjoy another visit to the Further, despite familiar plotting. Amelia Eve’s performance also earns praise, while The Wrap singles out the sound design for giving the scares depth.

The main disagreements concern how much those sequences compensate for thin characters, heavy exposition and franchise fatigue. Scores range from 30 to 75, reflecting a substantial split over much the same material. Collider welcomes an adventurous direction and an empowering story, though it finds the middle weak. The harsher reviews find tired mythology and predictable plotting, while even some supporters acknowledge that the storytelling becomes convoluted or loses momentum.

The AV Club
19 August 2026 · B- · Jesse Hassenger
70

Despite a mostly routine story and uninteresting new characters after many franchise entries, the film feels like a robust reconstitution of the formula with terrific set pieces. It singles out the lively, ghoul-packed finale and a merry reunion of past jump-scare demons for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 August 2026 · Tomris Laffly
70*

Director Jacob Chase nails creepy vibes and inventive dream-world setpieces, including gross-out dental horror and claustrophobic sequences. The story grows convoluted in the final act, though the film delivers old-school horror fun and polished frights.

Read the full review →
Vulture
21 August 2026
60*

The film is dumb and predictable in broad strokes but occasionally clever as a shock engine, especially early on with inventive set pieces like a pillow fort maze and dental office scares. It singles out the pliable Further premise and goofy Nightmare on Elm Street-like spirit for praise while noting it runs out of juice with exposition.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
24 August 2026 · ★★ · James Mottram
40

The critic feels the sixth Insidious instalment shows the franchise idea has become tired and needs to conclude. Amelia Eve's performance and one inventive claustrophobic sequence with sofa cushions are singled out as relative strengths amid generally weak scares and revelations.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 August 2026 · Frank Scheck
40*

The critic notes that while the film introduces a new set of victims, it remains a routine and tiresome Insidious entry with diminishing returns. Some effective jump scares and set pieces, such as a gruesome dental scene and a pillow fort labyrinth, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 August 2026 · Brandon Yu
40*

The critic finds the film less a retread than a kitschy carnival fright night, with demons resembling cosplay and costumed performers. It attempts to revamp the franchise with mostly new characters but has more problems than familiar horror pitfalls.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The Innocents poster

The Innocents

1961 · Rooms, glances and uncertainty create dread without needing a queue of demons.

Dark Water poster

Dark Water

2002 · A mother and daughter face a haunting grounded in everyday insecurity.

Poltergeist poster

Poltergeist

1982 · Domestic spaces become frightening while a family gives the haunting some weight.

The Babadook poster

The Babadook

2014 · A mother’s exhaustion makes the haunting troubling long before the monster appears.

The Orphanage poster

The Orphanage

2007 · Family grief gives the supernatural mystery the emotional force this film lacks.