A group of adults face a man standing beside a wooden fence at night
Film review

It Chapter Two

2019 · Directed by Andy Muschietti · 2h 49m

In a sentencePennywise has a good cast to frighten and an unreasonable amount of time to get round to it

Beverly Marsh (Jessica Chastain), Bill Denbrough (James McAvoy) and Richie Tozier (Bill Hader) return home to reunite with the Losers’ Club. The friends are grown up; the threat waiting for them is Pennywise (Bill Skarsgård), the killer clown they have faced before. Mike Hanlon (Isaiah Mustafa) is among the old friends brought together for another confrontation. They want to stop Pennywise, but coming back also means facing the fears attached to their childhood. As the group gathers, the adults find themselves confronting memories alongside the clown.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Bill Hader and Bill Skarsgård give this overlong homecoming some wit and menace. But repetitive scares and badly timed jokes leave Andy Muschietti’s sequel struggling to justify its 169 minutes.

Andy Muschietti wants the return of the grown-up Losers’ Club to carry the weight of everything they have failed to leave behind. It is a sound reason to make a horror sequel, and It Chapter Two has actors capable of making those old fears hurt. But this is a disappointing, overextended film, repeatedly breaking its own suspense with jokes and working through too many similar scares. Its 169 minutes allow plenty of time to notice the repetition.

Bill Hader gives Richie Tozier the mixture of humour and distress that the film needs. The jokes suggest a person trying to get through something unpleasant, and there is feeling beneath them without a demand that we stop and admire it. James Ransone, as Eddie Kaspbrak, is another welcome presence, making the reunion feel less solemn and more human. Together they help us care about a group whose history can otherwise feel like homework.

Jessica Chastain brings conviction to Beverly Marsh’s fear, even when the film around her becomes excessive. James McAvoy, as Bill Denbrough, helps give the reunion seriousness, though the adult ensemble does not always convince as people with a shared past. The repeated returns to childhood are affecting in places. They also make it harder for the grown-up cast to establish a sustained rhythm together.

We were uneasy watching Bill Skarsgård work beneath Pennywise’s greasepaint. His performance makes the clown feel sufficiently wrong before the digital transformations start competing for our attention. Those effects are inventive, but their extravagance often makes the danger easier to dismiss, and the jump scares become tiring. There is a frustrating amount of effort spent amplifying a performance that already knows how to frighten us.

Checco Varese’s cinematography gives the quieter passages a controlled, watchful quality; the faces hold our attention better than the digital creatures. Paul Denham Austerberry’s production design helps those passages feel credible enough for the actors’ fear to register. The film is carefully made, and the images remain worth looking at when the scares stop working. Benjamin Wallfisch’s score presses hard on the horror, adding to the exhaustion when a scene is already crowded with effects. Some quiet would help.

Jason Ballantine’s editing has the difficult job of moving between ages while keeping a large ensemble in play. Individual passages have energy, but the repeated pattern of fear, spectacle and comic relief becomes predictable. The screenplay by Gary Dauberman and Jason Fuchs keeps returning to familiar emotional business without finding enough new pressure to put on it. By the middle, we were bored by scares whose timing had become so easy to anticipate.

For horror about childhood fears surviving into adulthood, the interruptions are especially damaging: we need to spend longer with the people when they are frightened. The cast can supply the attachment, but the film keeps hurrying on to another attraction despite its length. Those already fond of the Losers’ Club may find enough pleasure in the reunion. Come mainly for sustained dread and the patience required is much harder to justify.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
13
Mixed
8
Negative
6

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of It Chapter Two, with praise clustering around the adult cast and its handling of the Losers’ reunion. Bill Hader’s Richie is the most consistently admired performance, earning approval even from critics who find the sequel disappointing. Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise also draws praise for supplying chills that the elaborate effects do not always match. Supporters find the horror inventive and the characters’ emotional lives affecting.

Excessive length and repetition are the recurring complaints, including among favourable reviews. Critics divide more sharply over whether the humour complements the horror or drains its suspense, and whether the adult ensemble recaptures the earlier film’s chemistry. The spread is wide: Empire considers the sequel a confident improvement, while Film Stories finds a bloated downgrade. Between those positions, many reviews describe an entertaining but uneven film whose performances do much of the work.

Empire
3 September 2019 · Alex Godfrey
90*

Godfrey finds the sequel an obscenely entertaining, confident step up that is deeper, scarier and funnier. He especially praises Bill Skarsgård’s unnerving performance as Pennywise and the film’s bold, inventive horror spectacle.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
3 September 2019 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80

O'Sullivan finds the film bold, frequently shocking and ultimately thrilling, though overlong and uneven. She especially praises its poignant portrayal of Richie’s concealed sexuality and thwarted desire.

Read the full review →
Time Out
2 September 2019 · ★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
80

Rothkopf says this horror sequel more than surpasses its predecessor. He highlights the grown-up Losers’ Club confronting Pennywise again.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 September 2019 · ★★★/4 · Henry Stewart
75

Stewart finds the sequel knowingly campy and entertaining, though it cannot match the source novel’s scope. He especially praises Bill Hader’s more layered performance as Richie.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3 September 2019 · Alan Jones
72*

The available standfirst describes the film as a captivating conclusion to the killer-clown saga. It singles out the Losers' Club's grim homecoming, but the full review is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
5 September 2019 · Lou Thomas
70*

Thomas finds the sequel enjoyable but over-reliant on jump scares and nostalgia. He singles out Bill Skarsgård’s terrifying Pennywise performance as its chief source of real chills.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is It Chapter Two worth watching?
It Chapter Two is a mixed prospect we score 55 out of 100, with more to offer viewers fond of the Losers’ Club than those seeking sustained dread. Bill Hader brings wit and feeling, and Bill Skarsgård remains unsettling as Pennywise, but repetitive scares and badly timed jokes make its 169 minutes difficult to justify.
How long is It Chapter Two, and what is it rated?
It Chapter Two runs 2h 49m. It is a horror and thriller film.
Where can I watch It Chapter Two in Ukraine?
It Chapter Two is available to rent from Apple TV from ₴3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is It Chapter Two, and is it suitable for children?
It Chapter Two has a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children, with an unsettling killer clown, jump scares and elaborate digital transformations. We find Pennywise’s quieter menace more frightening than the effects; older teenagers comfortable with horror may find it manageable, but the certificate rules out treating it as a family viewing choice.
How does It Chapter Two compare to Stand by Me?
It Chapter Two is the weaker choice beside Stand by Me if complicated childhood friendship is what draws you to these Stephen King adaptations. We find the latter’s funny, moving coming-of-age drama gives its young actors more room, despite some obvious emotional nudges; the horror sequel offers an adult reunion whose feeling is repeatedly interrupted by scares and jokes.
Is It Chapter Two based on a true story or a book?
It Chapter Two is adapted from a novel by Stephen King, rather than based on a true story. The film centres on grown-up friends confronting Pennywise and fears attached to their childhood; we find their shared history can feel like homework, but that is a criticism of the storytelling, not a reason to treat reading the novel as a prerequisite.
What should I watch after It Chapter Two?
After It Chapter Two, try Stand by Me (1986, Fi1m 88): Another Stephen King adaptation that gives childhood friendship room to feel complicated. Then Ring (1998, Fi1m 84): An investigation into a curse finds dread in ordinary rooms and recorded images; and The Babadook (2014, Fi1m 86): Domestic grief and a persistent creature make a more concentrated, uncomfortable horror story.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Stand by Me (1986, Fi1m 88)Another Stephen King adaptation that gives childhood friendship room to feel complicated.

  2. The Devil's Backbone (2001) · not reviewed yetChildren face a haunting that grows more troubling as its history emerges.

  3. Ring (1998, Fi1m 84)An investigation into a curse finds dread in ordinary rooms and recorded images.

  4. The Babadook (2014, Fi1m 86)Domestic grief and a persistent creature make a more concentrated, uncomfortable horror story.

  5. The Innocents (1961) · not reviewed yetA haunted household, watchful children and enough uncertainty to keep us uneasy.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever