Film review

Johnny Belinda

1948 · Directed by Jean Negulesco · 1h 42m · MPA NR

In a sentenceThe only person on Cape Breton who never says a foolish thing is the one who cannot speak

Drama

Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Belinda McDonald (Jane Wyman) has been deaf and mute since birth and works her father’s grist mill and farm; the village calls her the Dummy. Her father, Black MacDonald (Charles Bickford), is a hard man who has never thought of her as anything but a pair of hands, and her aunt Aggie MacDonald (Agnes Moorehead) keeps house and keeps her distance. A new doctor, Robert Richardson (Lew Ayres), arrives in the village, takes an interest in the girl at the mill and begins teaching her sign language, one word at a time. Locky McCormick (Stephen McNally), a local man courting Stella (Jan Sterling), starts to notice Belinda too, and the village starts to notice the doctor.

Fi1m review

A melodrama about a deaf young woman on a Nova Scotia farm, kept honest by Jane Wyman, who plays the part without a word and never begs for pity. The village is drawn more broadly, and Max Steiner’s score begs on her behalf.

Elmer Harris’s play Johnny Belinda had done its business on the stage, and Warner Bros bought it knowing what it was: a story about a deaf and mute farm girl in a small fishing village, an assault, and a baby the village would rather not explain. Under the censorship of 1948 the assault could not be shown and could barely be named, so what Jean Negulesco’s film has instead is a long look at a face. It is a weepie, and it knows it. What surprised us is how often it declines to weep.

Jane Wyman has no lines. She has her hands, once Robert Richardson (Lew Ayres), the new doctor, begins to teach her to sign, and before that she has only her eyes and the set of her shoulders, and the film asks her to carry its opening stretch on those alone. She does it by underplaying. Belinda is not a saint and not a child; she is a young woman who has spent her life being talked over, and Wyman shows her attending with her whole body to things she cannot hear. The scene in which she grasps that the shapes his fingers make are words, that a thing on the table has a name and she can now say it, moved us more than we were prepared for. Nothing in the staging tells us to be moved. Negulesco holds on her and lets us watch it arrive.

Charles Bickford plays her father, Black MacDonald, who runs the mill and has never called his daughter anything but the Dummy, as the rest of the village does. He is a granite piece of casting and Bickford is wise enough not to melt. When the man begins to see her differently, the voice stays as hard as before; only what he does with his hands changes. Agnes Moorehead’s Aggie MacDonald, the aunt, is sharper and quicker and gets the film’s best dry lines, and Moorehead plays her thaw as something that costs her.

Ted McCord photographs the village in black and white with a good deal of fog and a fair amount of mud, the mill wheel turning behind half the scenes at the MacDonald place. The coast is northern California standing in for Nova Scotia and it stands in well; the light is flat and cold and nobody has been asked to look pretty in it. David Weisbart’s cutting is patient in the mill and the doctor’s surgery and brisker in the village, which is the right way round. Max Steiner’s score is the problem. It arrives at every feeling a bar before the actors do and stays after they have finished, and there were three or four moments when Wyman had done the work and the strings insisted on doing it again.

The village is the film’s other weakness. Rosalind Ivan’s Mrs. Poggety, Mabel Paige’s Mrs. Lutz and Ida Moore’s Mrs. McKee are a chorus of gossips written with a thick pencil, there to say the worst thing about the doctor and the girl at the moment the plot needs it said. Stephen McNally’s Locky McCormick is a brute from his first scene, and Jan Sterling, as Stella, the woman he is courting, is given little to do until late on. Lew Ayres’s doctor is decent, patient and slightly wooden; the film needs him to be good, and Ayres settles for being good rather than interesting.

The second half takes the story where the play took it, toward a public reckoning we will not describe, and it is there that the film becomes ordinary. Allen Vincent and Irma von Cube’s screenplay keeps the speeches short and the hysteria out, which is more than most adaptations of stage melodrama managed in the period, but the machinery of the final act is machinery all the same. Everything the film does best happens in a room with two people in it and one of them not speaking.

Negulesco was a studio director who made what he was given, and here he was given something worth handling carefully. Critics at the time thought it better than its material, and so do we. At 102 minutes it does not dawdle. Watch it for Wyman and Bickford, and if you find the music too much, you will not be alone on the sofa.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0

With only 3 reviews in so far, the early notices are all favourable, and they agree on where the credit lies. Jane Wyman’s performance as the deaf-mute heroine is singled out by every critic as the film’s chief strength, and Jean Negulesco’s direction is repeatedly praised for keeping a story that could easily have tipped into excess within sane, sympathetic limits. The supporting cast and the screenplay are also noted as credible and well handled. The spread is narrow, from 75 to 80, with no dissent; the only mild reservation is The New Yorker’s framing of it as a well-handled melodrama rather than anything more.

The New York Times
2 October 1948 · Bosley Crowther
80*

The critic praises the sensitive and poignant performance of Jane Wyman as the deaf-mute heroine and notes that the film is surprisingly good and moving despite its stage origins. Highlights the able direction by Jean Negulesco and the credible supporting performances.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1948
80*

The critic notes the story avoids becoming excessive theatrics through tasteful handling and Jean Negulesco’s sympathetic direction that keeps the heart-strings twanging. Highlights strong performances, especially Jane Wyman’s mute portrayal as a personal success.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 October 1948
75*

The review finds the film a well-handled melodrama with a reasonable air of verisimilitude, crediting the superior screenplay and Jean Negulesco’s direction for keeping it within sane limits. Singles out the convincing performances, particularly Jane Wyman as the heroine.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1949

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Art Direction, Black and White
Nominated
Best Cinematography, Black-and-White
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Dramatic or Comedy Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Actress

If you liked this, try…

Mandy poster

Mandy

1952 · Mackendrick’s film about a deaf child and her parents, plainer and even less sentimental

The Miracle Worker poster

The Miracle Worker

1962 · Helen Keller and Annie Sullivan at war over a water pump; the teaching scenes are brutal

The Piano poster88

The Piano

1993 · A mute woman, a colonial coast and a bargain over an instrument; Campion at full strength

Children of a Lesser God poster

Children of a Lesser God

1986 · A teacher and a deaf woman argue, in two languages, about who should speak

The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter poster

The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter

1968 · Alan Arkin as a deaf man in a Southern town, and a lonelier film than this one