Williams (Bill Nighy) speaks with Margaret Harris (Aimee Lou Wood) across a pub table
Film review

Living

2022 · Directed by Oliver Hermanus · 1h 42m

In a sentenceBill Nighy makes a small change of expression feel like a considerable breach of etiquette

In the 1950s, Williams (Bill Nighy) begins to question what his life amounts to and what he might still leave behind. Reserved and unused to giving much of himself away, he struggles to express what matters to him. His connection with Margaret Harris (Aimee Lou Wood) brings him closer to a younger person’s experience of life. Alongside them are Peter Wakeling (Alex Sharp) and Sutherland (Tom Burke). Williams wants to make his life mean something, but must find a way to act on feelings he has become accustomed to keeping to himself.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Bill Nighy makes Living quietly moving, with Aimee Lou Wood bringing welcome warmth to its carefully arranged period world. We recommend it for their scenes together, with a warning that the stately pace sometimes hardens into stiffness.

Oliver Hermanus’s Living is worth an evening for Bill Nighy’s performance, even when its measured pace becomes stiff. The film takes seriously Williams’s wish to leave something meaningful behind, without requiring him to become an easier man to read. Kazuo Ishiguro’s screenplay gives that difficulty room, sometimes more room than the story needs. We are asked to pay attention to someone whose feelings are not readily available, and the lead performance makes that attention worthwhile.

Bill Nighy is precise about how much Williams allows to show. There is a danger with such a contained performance that the audience ends up supplying feelings the actor has not found, but that rarely happens here. The slight changes in expression make the reserve seem effortful, and leave us watching closely for the next response. Williams remains difficult to know, yet we never doubt that there is someone worth knowing beneath the manner.

We were moved more than we expected by the scenes between Williams and Margaret Harris. Aimee Lou Wood gives their connection warmth without making her own performance as restrained as Bill Nighy’s, and the contrast gives their exchanges some welcome ease. His small responses matter because she seems capable of reaching him without forcing an explanation. These scenes give us time to become interested in both people, and to care about how they get on together.

Jamie Ramsay’s expressive framing makes the County Hall setting properly imposing, and gives the period surroundings a role beyond looking handsome. Helen Scott’s production design helps establish a 1950s world in which Williams’s formality feels ordinary. That matters: a less convincing setting could make him look like a collection of quaint habits preserved for our amusement. At times, though, the polished images are a little too comfortable to look at for a story troubled by the passing of time.

The pace is less consistently judged. At 102 minutes, Living is not long, but Chris Wyatt’s editing leaves stretches that feel slower than the performance requires. Emilie Levienaise-Farrouch’s music can also press too hard, adding emotional emphasis where Bill Nighy has already made a modest response sufficient. These are occasional irritations, but both make us aware of how firmly the film would like to guide our feelings.

Williams’s family life is less fully drawn than his connection with Margaret Harris, and that leaves a gap in our understanding of him. Kazuo Ishiguro and Oliver Hermanus are better at allowing us to feel his reserve than at exploring everything that has sustained it. Still, a period drama about regret can easily become a procession of tasteful lessons, and the actors mostly prevent that here. The strongest scenes allow affection and awkwardness to coexist without tidying either away.

We do not need the film to explain its concern with mortality quite so carefully. Its most persuasive evidence is already in the effort Williams makes to connect, and in the attention Margaret Harris gives him. Those exchanges stayed with us more than the polished period images. See it for the company of Bill Nighy and Aimee Lou Wood, and allow for the slow going between their scenes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
18
Mixed
7
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Living, with praise clustering around Bill Nighy’s restrained performance and the film’s carefully realised period setting. The reviews repeatedly find emotional weight in his reserve, while several single out his scenes with Aimee Lou Wood for their intimacy. The visual style also earns broad approval: critics admire the framing, period detail and measured presentation of a story about mortality and the value of ordinary life.

Opinion ranges from emphatic admiration to qualified appreciation, with no wholly negative verdicts. The main divide concerns what the remake adds to Ikiru: Empire regards it as an enrichment, while Slant Magazine finds it too faithful. IndieWire argues that compressing the story reduces its emotional force, despite Nighy’s affecting work. Other reservations concern slow pacing, an underdeveloped family life and a final stretch that some critics find less moving than the earlier scenes.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The review praises the film as a thoughtful, superbly rendered drama and lauds Bill Nighy’s performance. It singles out the evocative 1950s look and visual presentation for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 January 2022 · ★★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
100

Time Out presents the film as an emotionally searing redo, led by a career-best performance from Bill Nighy. The praise singles out Nighy’s performance as the film’s standout.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 December 2022 · A · Matthew Huff
95

Huff finds the film an artistically masterful, deceptively simple meditation on life and death. He especially praises Bill Nighy’s restrained, memorable performance and his electric scenes with Aimee Lou Wood.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 November 2022 · John Nugent
90*

The critic calls it a rare remake that enriches its source and a major achievement for Bill Nighy. They especially praise Nighy’s restrained performance, alongside the film’s careful craftsmanship.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
10 October 2022 · BFI
90*

The review finds that Hermanus’s remake comes very close to perfection and can stand alongside Kurosawa’s original. It particularly praises Bill Nighy’s portrayal of Williams, while noting that his family life is underdeveloped.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 November 2022 · Mark Kermode
85*

Kermode finds the film beautifully melancholy and moving, praising its understated treatment of mortality and lost youth. He especially singles out Bill Nighy and Aimee Lou Wood for their deeply affecting performances and the intimate bond they create.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Living worth watching?
Living is worth watching for Bill Nighy’s finely restrained performance and his quietly moving scenes with Aimee Lou Wood; we score it 81 out of 100. We recommend it to those who enjoy patient, character-led drama, with the caveat that its stately pace sometimes becomes stiff and its music occasionally presses too hard.
How long is Living, and what is it rated?
Living runs 1h 42m. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Living in Ecuador?
Living is streaming on Netflix in Ecuador. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Living, and is it suitable for children?
Living has a UK 12A certificate, meaning children under 12 need an accompanying adult at the cinema, though that rating alone does not establish how violent or frightening it is. Its concerns with mortality, regret and wasted time, together with its slow pace, make it a more natural choice for teenagers and adults interested in reflective drama.
How does Living compare to Ikiru?
Living offers a warmer, more polished period treatment of a reserved man confronting wasted time, while Ikiru takes a harsher view of bureaucracy and earns our broader recommendation. We favour Living for the touching contrast between Bill Nighy and Aimee Lou Wood; Ikiru is the stronger choice for Takashi Shimura’s painfully ordinary fear of a life slipping away.
What should I watch after Living?
After Living, try Ikiru (1952, Fi1m 92): Another reserved man confronts wasted time, with a harsher view of bureaucracy. Then The Remains of the Day (1993, Fi1m 88): The cost of keeping feelings private, explored through another painfully controlled performance; and The Straight Story (1999, Fi1m 88): A modest journey gives an elderly man’s unfinished business room to matter.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2023

Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ikiru (1952, Fi1m 92)Another reserved man confronts wasted time, with a harsher view of bureaucracy.

  2. The Remains of the Day (1993, Fi1m 88)The cost of keeping feelings private, explored through another painfully controlled performance.

  3. The Straight Story (1999, Fi1m 88)A modest journey gives an elderly man’s unfinished business room to matter.

  4. Still Walking (2008) · not reviewed yetFamily obligations and old resentments emerge through meals, pauses and ordinary conversation.

  5. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)A mistaken lunch delivery opens a correspondence between two quietly lonely people.