Film review

Madame Web

2024 · Directed by SJ Clarkson · 1h 57m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceDakota Johnson gets psychic powers and the expression of someone being asked to cover an extra shift

ActionFantasy

In 2003, paramedic Cassandra Webb (Dakota Johnson) begins experiencing visions of the future. A baby shower finds her struggling with ordinary social obligations; her new ability brings less familiar responsibilities. She becomes involved with Julia Cornwall (Sydney Sweeney), Anya Corazón (Isabela Merced) and Mattie Franklin (Celeste O’Connor), three young women who are not inclined to agree with her or one another. She tries to understand what her visions mean while dealing with companions who have their own ideas about being told what to do. Taking charge of them is a responsibility she is reluctant to accept.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Dakota Johnson’s awkward humour gives Madame Web a few welcome laughs. SJ Clarkson’s superhero origin story is otherwise sluggish and over-explained, with fractured action and too little attention paid to the women at its centre.

A paramedic who can glimpse danger before it arrives is a sensible starting point for a superhero thriller. There is a job to do and a reason to be frightened. Madame Web, directed by SJ Clarkson, keeps this premise small enough for individual people to matter. Yet the explanations keep interrupting their attempts to get to know one another, and the danger seldom becomes urgent. We found it a poor, wearying film, despite a lead performance that supplies some welcome humour.

Dakota Johnson plays Cassandra Webb with a social awkwardness that is more interesting than the details of her origin story. We laughed at her discomfort during the baby shower, because she makes polite participation look like a task for which she has received no training. Her flat delivery allows an ungracious response to remain funny without making her seem cruel. The performance sometimes becomes so withdrawn that it is difficult to care what happens to her, but she has enough awkward charm to hold our attention between explanations.

Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced and Celeste O’Connor bring some life to the exchanges between the younger women and Cassandra Webb. Their bickering offers a reason to spend time with the group beyond waiting for another explanation of the plot. But the screenplay gives them too little individuality for that friction to develop into relationships we care about. Tahar Rahim has even less room as Ezekiel Sims, whose menace is repeatedly explained and seldom felt.

The screenplay, credited to Burk Sharpless, Claire Parker, Matt Sazama and SJ Clarkson, gives explanation far more space than behaviour. It keeps checking that we understand the premise, without giving the characters enough worthwhile things to do with it. That is particularly damaging in a story built around anticipating danger, where each pause to clarify matters lets the suspense drain away. At 117 minutes, it takes a modest amount of story a long time to tell.

Leigh Folsom Boyd’s editing has one useful device: the glitches that accompany Cassandra Webb’s visions briefly make her uncertainty ours. For those moments, the film lets us experience her difficulty instead of having somebody describe it. Elsewhere, the cuts leave the action disjointed rather than tense, and following the immediate danger takes more effort than it should. Mauro Fiore’s cinematography keeps the ordinary surroundings clean and legible, but does little to make them feel threatening when the cutting fails to build suspense.

Ethan Tobman’s production design helps establish the 2003 setting, and the attention to period detail is welcome. The conspicuous branding becomes distracting, though, and it is hard to enjoy those details when products keep demanding notice. Johan Söderqvist’s score supplies urgency that the scenes themselves too often lack. The music is trying to sustain a threat that Tahar Rahim has not been given enough material to establish.

The film’s restrained scale is worth defending in a genre that can make every problem a global emergency. There is room for a superhero story about an unwilling adult and younger women learning to tolerate one another, and this cast occasionally finds it. But the humour is intermittent, and the lifeless stretches are too long to make a persuasive evening of accidental comedy. Only committed admirers of Dakota Johnson’s dry humour should make time for this.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

36
Positive
1
Mixed
6
Negative
16

Most critics find Madame Web a weak superhero origin story, with occasional pleasures that do little to offset its problems. Praise centres on Dakota Johnson’s dry humour and awkward charm: even several negative reviews credit her with making poor dialogue briefly amusing. The more sympathetic reviews also enjoy the fractious rapport between the women, finding a lightly engaging story about their relationships beneath the exposition and preparations for a larger saga.

The main complaints concern confused plotting, flat characters and action that rarely generates much excitement, though Johnson’s detachment also strikes some critics as disengagement. The spread runs from qualified affection to outright dismissal, with little agreement on whether the absurdity is enjoyable. Sight and Sound finds the ensemble lightly likeable, while the Los Angeles Times enjoys the unintentional camp; The Ringer explicitly rejects the idea that the film offers that sort of bad-film pleasure.

Sight and Sound
15 February 2024 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic views the film as an unnecessary but lightly likeable Spider-Man spin-off that offers fun with its team of fractious female characters. It stands out for its irreverent take and the appealing rapport among the leads despite its overstuffed nature.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 February 2024 · Katie Walsh
60*

The critic calls the film unintentionally campy and ridiculous rather than good, but often hilariously delightful for fans of camp. Dakota Johnson's weird, twinkling performance is singled out as the main appeal that makes it worth seeing.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
13 February 2024 · Christy Lemire
60*

The critic finds it a low-stakes origin story buoyed by Dakota Johnson's amusing, deadpan performance as the reluctant clairvoyant paramedic. Visual chaos in the finale and leaden exposition weigh it down, but breezy pacing makes it more enjoyable than many overwrought superhero films.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
13 February 2024 · C- · David Ehrlich
50

A hilariously retrograde superhero movie that feels like it was made in 2003 and seems created by people who have never seen a superhero film. Johnson does her best to save the project, but the film lacks any real vision or coherence.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 February 2024
50*

The critic sees the film as a somewhat spirited superhero origin story that benefits from Dakota Johnson’s grounded humour and solid action but mostly serves as the unpromising first chapter of a larger saga. It is praised for its accessible plotting and the bratty rapport between the lead and the younger characters.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 February 2024 · Manohla Dargis
40*

The critic finds the film bad but not memorably so, with an absurd story, risible dialogue and uninspired fights. Dakota Johnson's detached, natural awkwardness and charm are praised for humanizing the character and rising above the material.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 2024

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

If you liked this, try…