Film review

Thelma & Louise

1991 · Directed by Ridley Scott · 2h 10m · MPA R

In a sentenceWe would share the driving with Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis, though perhaps not the decision-making

DramaCrimeAdventure

Thelma (Geena Davis) and Louise (Susan Sarandon) take to the road together, looking for room to live on their own terms. Their journey becomes a crime story, with friendship, independence and the use of force tied together as they try to keep moving. Ridley Scott directs Callie Khouri’s screenplay, which follows the two women through an American landscape and a series of encounters with men. Harvey Keitel plays Hal, Michael Madsen is Jimmy, Christopher McDonald is Darryl and Brad Pitt appears as J.D. The story combines drama, comedy and adventure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis make Ridley Scott’s road film funny, angry and worth your evening. The men can be cartoonishly written, but the friendship has enough life to keep the film from becoming a lecture.

Ridley Scott’s Thelma & Louise is funny, angry and unusually good company. We recommend it warmly, chiefly for Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis, whose shared scenes make us wish the next complication would wait. Callie Khouri’s screenplay gives the women a journey in which friendship matters as much as the freedom to keep moving. Scott gives both actresses room to be playful, even within a crime story that keeps increasing the pressure. The busier plotting is sometimes less interesting than the women talking.

Davis plays Thelma with an openness that makes her excitement easy to share. Sarandon makes Louise’s confidence look like something she has to work at. The pleasure is in how quickly they respond to each other, including when the dialogue has no urgent business to conduct. We laughed most in those casual exchanges, because neither actress rushes to deliver the joke and move on. Khouri has an ear for rude, familiar speech, and the performers leave room for its awkwardness.

Adrian Biddle’s cinematography gives the journey a welcome sense of space. The night-time desert drive is especially persuasive: there is time simply to look, and the landscape makes the wish to keep travelling understandable. We wanted it to last longer. Production designer Norris Spencer gives the film’s surroundings a comparable polish, which fits Scott’s expansive American imagery. Scott’s taste for grandeur sometimes leaves us wishing these lives looked a little less tidily arranged.

Thom Noble’s editing allows time for those quieter stretches without making the journey dawdle. The film runs 130 minutes, yet the shifts between conversation, comedy and crime rarely make it feel overlong. Hans Zimmer’s music helps keep it moving, though it can press too hard on feelings that the actresses have already made clear. We prefer the stretches when Scott lets a look or a line from the women provide the excitement.

The reservations sit mostly with Khouri’s writing of the men. Several are drawn so broadly that the women hardly need to make a case against them; a little more ordinary plausibility would make the anger sharper. There is also a limit to how much a gun can tell us about someone becoming independent. We understand the thrill Khouri is after, but the reliance on weapons sometimes makes the women’s growing confidence seem too simple. Sarandon and Davis keep finding uncertainty that the louder incidents do not always allow for.

In a buddy road film, the travelling companions have to be worth following even when the car is going nowhere. Scott gets that right, and the stretches that seem least concerned with advancing the crime story are among the most enjoyable. Khouri gives the women enough shared humour for us to understand why this friendship matters to them. The grander passages can try a little too hard to make sure we understand why it matters to everybody else. Watch it for Sarandon and Davis, and allow for a few men who have arrived already labelled.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Thelma & Louise, with praise clustering around Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis’s convincing partnership, Callie Khouri’s sharp dialogue and Ridley Scott’s energetic direction. The reviews find humour and feeling in the women’s friendship, and admire the expansive American landscapes. Several welcome the film’s reworking of the buddy road film around women, while others find its strongest moments in the leads’ relaxed exchanges rather than its more emphatic dramatic turns.

The disagreement concerns how convincingly that entertainment serves its account of female freedom. Time Out admires the performances but objects to stereotyped men and women whose strength depends too heavily on guns. Sight and Sound takes a more fundamental dissenting position, finding a conventional morality tale with a restrictive attitude towards women taking control. The spread is wide: enthusiasm for the acting and direction does not produce agreement about the screenplay’s psychology or politics.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

The film is hugely entertaining and controversial, putting women in the driving seat for the first time and sparking debate on liberation versus defeminisation. It provokes indignation while entertaining.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 January 2006 · Angie Errigo
80*

The critic views it as a genuine must-see for its smart script, bravura performances, and visual spectacle, though it falls short of masterpiece status. They single out the stunning landscapes and the iconic ending as particularly praiseworthy.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 July 1991 · Tim Pulleine
70*

The critic praises the technical accomplishment, opulent production values, and immediacy of the performances in this road movie with a gender-swapped twist. However, the lack of psychological grounding in the screenplay makes the apocalyptic ending feel more fabricated than inevitable.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 May 2012 · CM
65*

Scott directs with blistering energy and the lead performances are convincing, but the script reduces men to stereotypes and the women gain strength mainly through gun use rather than self-knowledge.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1991 · Janet Abrams
40*

The critic sees the film as a remarkably conventional morality tale with an ambivalent, even repressive attitude toward women seizing control of their lives. One night scene driving through the Painted Desert stands out for its poetic cinematic quality.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 May 1991 · Kenneth Turan

The critic calls the film a provocative, poignant and heartbreakingly funny neo-feminist road movie that forever changes the masculine preserve of the genre. It singles out the writer's exceptional ear for authentic, raunchy dialogue and the lead actresses' formidable range of emotions.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1992

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Writing, Original Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore poster

Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore

1974 · A woman starts again, with work and companionship complicating the promise of escape.

Daisies poster

Daisies

1966 · Two women misbehave with a freedom that makes Scott look positively orderly.

Vagabond poster

Vagabond

1985 · Female freedom on the road, stripped of comfort and easy reassurance.

Set It Off poster

Set It Off

1996 · Friendship and armed crime, with more attention to the pressures behind the choices.

Take Care of My Cat poster

Take Care of My Cat

2001 · Young women testing what friendship can survive when their lives stop matching.