Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) enters a castle hall as courtiers gather around the stairs
Film review

Maleficent

2014 · Directed by Robert Stromberg · 1h 37m · RO 12

In a sentenceDisney spends 97 minutes explaining its best villain and ends up with a babysitter in horns

Two kingdoms share a border: the Moors, a forest of fairies, and the human realm beside it, ruled by the greedy King Henry (Kenneth Cranham). Maleficent, a fairy with great wings, befriends a peasant boy, Stefan; Isobelle Molloy and Michael Higgins play them as children, and the friendship cools as they grow. When Henry’s army marches on the Moors and is thrown back, he promises his crown to whoever kills her. The adult Stefan (Sharlto Copley) returns to his old friend, drugs her and cuts off her wings while she sleeps. Maleficent (Angelina Jolie), now walking where she once flew, saves a raven, Diaval (Sam Riley), and gives him a man’s shape. When the new king’s daughter Aurora is christened, she arrives at the castle without an invitation.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Angelina Jolie is a perfect fit for the horns and gets the film’s few good lines. Around her, Robert Stromberg’s revision of Sleeping Beauty is handsome in patches, rushed in storytelling and so anxious to redeem its villain that it forgets why anyone liked her.

Disney goes back to its own Sleeping Beauty (1959), takes the horned fairy who cursed a baby because she was left off a guest list, and asks what she had against the baby. Linda Woolverton’s script gives her a childhood, a sweetheart and a grievance, and the tagline says “Don’t believe the fairy tale.” The trouble is that the film does not believe in its villain either. It has 97 minutes and it spends most of them making her nicer.

Angelina Jolie is the reason to watch and the film knows it. The cheekbones are built out with prosthetics until her face is a set of angles, the horns are bound in black leather, and she moves little but her eyebrows and her vowels. Her entrance at the christening is the best scene by a distance: she glides up the hall, bows to a frightened court, and delivers the curse in the tone of a hostess who regrets she cannot stay. Later she tells a baby to its face that she does not like children, and we laughed, surprised at how dry she is allowed to be.

The other scene that works is the one that should not be in a PG film at all. Stefan (Sharlto Copley), the boy she loved, drugs her and cuts off her wings while she sleeps. Robert Stromberg holds on Jolie’s face as she wakes and finds them gone, and the noise she makes is not a fairy-tale noise; it is a woman discovering what has been done to her body. We were shaken. It is the one moment the film has the nerve to be about what it says it is about, and the script never goes back there.

Stromberg designed the world of Avatar (2009) before he directed anything, and it shows both ways. Gary Freeman and Dylan Cole’s Moors are a lit garden of glowing pools, walking trees and mud creatures with faces. Dean Semler shoots them in a permanent late afternoon and King Henry’s castle in slate blue, so you always know which side of the border you are on. Jane Clive and Anna B. Sheppard give Jolie high black collars and horns wrapped in leather that look handmade rather than rendered. The failure is the three pixies. Imelda Staunton, Lesley Manville and Juno Temple are shrunk by the effects to the size of starlings with their own faces pasted on, and spend what feels like a quarter of the film squabbling in a cottage. We were bored there, and it was the particular boredom of watching good actors wasted.

The structure is the deeper problem. Chris Lebenzon and Richard Pearson cut sixteen years into a montage and the story into blocks that do not join. Copley is asked to play a king going mad and given three scenes to do it in, so he shouts in a Scottish accent at things off screen. Elle Fanning’s Aurora is sunny and has no other quality. Brenton Thwaites’s Phillip rides in on a horse and is at once the butt of a joke about princes. Sam Riley’s Diaval, a raven given a man’s shape who resents every other animal he is turned into, is the best supporting turn. James Newton Howard supplies a choir for the Moors and a swelling theme for the wings, pleasant throughout and loud at the finish.

The 1959 Maleficent frightened children because she had no reason. Woolverton wrote Beauty and the Beast (1991) and knows how to make a monster lovable, and that is what goes wrong here: she does it again, and the film is left with a villain nobody is allowed to enjoy and an antagonist nobody feared in the first place. The last twenty minutes do pick up, and we felt the lift, for reasons we will not describe.

Take a child who knows the cartoon. They will like the Moors and the eyebrows and ask you on the way home why the bad lady was nice. The film had 97 minutes to answer that and spent them changing the subject.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
7
Mixed
7
Negative
6

The reviews split almost evenly three ways, and the critics’ score settles in the middle. On one thing nearly everyone agrees: Angelina Jolie. Critic after critic calls her casting the film’s strongest feature, praising her presence, her physical control and the way she makes the character both tender and dangerous. The visual design draws the next largest share of praise, with the richly imagined fairy world and the costumes singled out repeatedly.

The disagreement is about everything around her. Those who like the film find its feminist revision of the old tale witty and moving; those who do not say the storytelling is clumsy and the emotional arc incoherent, and that turning the villain into a wronged heroine sanitises what made her interesting. The spread is wide, from warm raves to Empire calling it confused and boring. Paste is the rare dissenter on Jolie herself, finding her performance limited, and Den of Geek says even the striking visual moments cannot carry the weak acting and muddled story.

The Hollywood Reporter
28 May 2014 · Sheri Linden
90*

Linden finds the film a dazzling, emotionally absorbing reinvention, despite a few bumpy patches. She especially praises Angelina Jolie’s magnetic performance and the film’s richly imagined visual world.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
30 May 2014 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
85*

O'Sullivan gives the film an emphatically positive verdict, calling it a project with peculiar, landscape-changing power. She especially praises Angelina Jolie's natural fit for the role and the film's feminist mood, visual effects and costumes.

Read the full review →
Total Film
28 May 2014 · ★★★★ · Jane Crowther
80

Crowther finds the film a magical, modern adventure that is visually sumptuous and thought-provoking, though it does not fully reinvent the tale. She especially praises Angelina Jolie’s commanding, emotionally nuanced performance as Maleficent.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
2 July 2014 · Joan Acocella
78*

Acocella finds the film’s revision of the fairy tale’s romance and gender politics witty and moving. She especially praises Angelina Jolie’s nuanced physical performance, which makes Maleficent both tender and dangerous.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
28 May 2014 · Mark Adams
75*

The critic calls the film a thoroughly entertaining fantasy romp. The standfirst praises its overall entertainment value, but the paywalled text does not reveal a specific element singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
29 May 2014 · Betsy Sharkey
70*

Sharkey finds the film uneven but ultimately engaging, with Angelina Jolie making a mesmerizing Maleficent. She also praises the striking visual world, while noting that the film’s many ideas blunt its emotional impact.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Maleficent worth watching?
Maleficent is worth watching mainly for Angelina Jolie, who gets the film's few good lines and its best scene, and we scored it 55. Around her, Robert Stromberg's revision of Sleeping Beauty is handsome in patches but rushed and so anxious to redeem its villain that it forgets why anyone liked her. Children who know the cartoon will enjoy the Moors; adults will tire of the pixies.
How long is Maleficent, and what is it rated?
Maleficent runs 1h 37m and is rated 12 by the RO in Romania. It is a fantasy and adventure film.
Where can I watch Maleficent in Romania?
Maleficent is streaming on Disney+ in Romania. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Maleficent compare to Sleeping Beauty?
Maleficent retells Sleeping Beauty from the villain's side, and the earlier film is the stronger of the two. The 1959 Maleficent frightened children because she had no reason; Jolie's is given a childhood and a grievance and ends up nicer than she should be. Watch the original for Eyvind Earle's backgrounds and Eleanor Audley's voice, and the remake for Jolie's eyebrows.
What should I watch after Maleficent?
After Maleficent, try Sleeping Beauty (1959, Fi1m 78): The original, where Maleficent needs no excuse and is frightening for it. Then Pan's Labyrinth (2006, Fi1m 87): A girl, a fairy kingdom and a real war, with menace this film only gestures at; and Wicked (2024, Fi1m 70): Another villain given her side of the story, with songs and a steadier structure.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2015

Nominated
Best Costume Design

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2015

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

BAFTA Film Awards, 2014

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Sleeping Beauty (1959, Fi1m 78)The original, where Maleficent needs no excuse and is frightening for it.

  2. La Belle et la Bête (1946) · not reviewed yetCocteau’s fairy tale, made with candles and mirrors, still stranger than any effects house.

  3. The Company of Wolves (1984) · not reviewed yetAngela Carter’s wolves and Neil Jordan’s forest; a fairy tale that keeps its teeth.

  4. Pan's Labyrinth (2006, Fi1m 87)A girl, a fairy kingdom and a real war, with menace this film only gestures at.

  5. Wicked (2024, Fi1m 70)Another villain given her side of the story, with songs and a steadier structure.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever