A Monsters University flag flies above the campus buildings and tree-lined courtyard
Film review

Monsters University

2013 · Directed by Dan Scanlon · 1h 44m · MPA G

In a sentenceA campus full of monsters, and the dean is still the most frightening person there

Mike (Billy Crystal) arrives at university with ambitions that may not match his abilities. Among the monster students are Sullivan (John Goodman) and Randy (Steve Buscemi), while Dean Hardscrabble (Helen Mirren) presides over their education with little apparent warmth. Mike wants to prove himself, but the campus has its own tests of who belongs. Student pranks and the competitive Scare Games surround a developing friendship between Mike and Sullivan, who have to discover what they can offer each other. These are their college days, before the events of Monsters, Inc..

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Monsters University is a warm, funny college comedy held back by familiar plotting. Billy Crystal and John Goodman make the friendship worth following, while the monster designs offer more invention than most of the student pranks.

Monsters University is an enjoyable college comedy whose strongest reason to exist is still the friendship between its leads. Dan Scanlon takes the characters back to their student days, where an underdog story offers plenty of opportunities for jokes and fewer for surprise. The film is good company, though its campus is more inventive than much of what happens there. Its more interesting concern is how ambition survives contact with actual ability, a useful subject for a family film to approach without scolding.

Billy Crystal and John Goodman do most of the work that makes this worth following. Billy Crystal gives Mike a restless urgency, while John Goodman’s Sullivan has enough ease to keep their exchanges from becoming a competition for the funniest line. As the friendship develops, the animation pays attention to how the pair move together, letting their changing relationship appear in their physical behaviour. That careful physical acting gives the familiar friendship story some credibility, even when the plot around it is easy to anticipate.

Ricky Nierva’s production design gives the university enough detail to reward looking beyond whoever is speaking. The peripheral monsters have shapes and proportions that make them funny before they have done anything, and their variety is a pleasure in itself. Cinematographers Jean-Claude Kalache and Matt Aspbury keep the crowded campus legible rather than letting all that detail compete for attention. The visual clarity matters in a comedy with this many characters, allowing the individual designs to remain distinct within the busy surroundings.

The screenplay by Robert L. Baird, Dan Scanlon and Dan Gerson is much less adventurous. The Scare Games give the students something to do, but the underdog competition follows too many familiar steps to generate much suspense. Several college pranks feel as though they could have been written for human students, which seems a waste of such a flexible cast of creatures. The middle stretch is where the film most needs a stranger idea, and where it most often settles for another familiar contest.

Greg Snyder’s editing keeps those stretches moving, and the pace is brisk without making the friendship feel hurried. At 104 minutes, however, the film has room for more supporting characters than it can make memorable. Randy Newman’s marching-band music supplies the proper collegiate bustle, then keeps supplying it after the setting has made its point. The insistence becomes tiring, and some jokes would land better with less encouragement.

Helen Mirren gives Dean Hardscrabble an amusing lack of patience. We laughed at her stony delivery, because she treats this ridiculous institution as though its standards were beyond discussion. Her severity stops these scenes from becoming quite as cosy as the rest. Steve Buscemi’s Randy gets less opportunity to register, and several of the supporting monsters are more memorable for their appearance than anything they say.

Family comedies can become exhausting when every ambition comes with a guarantee of success, and this one is interested in what happens when enthusiasm is not enough. It takes young hopes seriously while allowing some doubt about where they might lead. That gives adults something to discuss without making children sit through a lecture. Give it a family evening, with some patience reserved for the more routine student antics.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

63
Positive
11
Mixed
10
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards qualified approval: most critics find Monsters University entertaining, though many see it as a lesser companion to Monsters, Inc. Praise centres on the detailed campus, imaginative monster designs and carefully choreographed animation. Mike and Sulley’s rapport also earns broad affection, alongside the sight gags and Helen Mirren’s stern Dean Hardscrabble. Even several less enthusiastic reviews acknowledge the humour and the pleasure of returning to these characters.

The main divide concerns the storytelling, with verdicts ranging from enthusiastic to sharply dismissive. Reservations cluster around familiar college-comedy routines, predictable underdog plotting and a weaker emotional pull than the original. Collider, however, praises the intelligence of its treatment of friendship, failure and finding one’s strengths. Empire finds the plotting smart and unpredictable, while The Hollywood Reporter regards the story and Scare Games as tame and uninspired. The visual craft commands much wider agreement than the writing.

Empire
5 July 2013 · Olly Richards
85*

Richards finds the prequel clever, funny, and successful as a film in its own right. He especially praises its smart, unpredictable plotting and how it enriches the original.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Terry Staunton
80

Staunton presents the prequel as a gag-packed return to the characters’ college days. He singles out Helen Mirren’s performance as the stony-faced Dean Hardscrabble for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 August 2013 · ★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

Johnston awards the prequel four out of five stars, indicating a favorable verdict. The available page text says only that the premise initially sounds like a comedown for Pixar, without revealing what he singles out for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 June 2013 · B · A.A. Dowd
77

Dowd finds the prequel charming but minor, saying it echoes rather than enriches the original. He praises the returning Mike-and-Sully pairing, while faulting the college-comedy plot for lacking comic inspiration.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
20 June 2013 · Charles Solomon
70*

Solomon finds the film a lot of fun despite its predictable, thin story and weaker emotional core than Monsters, Inc. He praises the animation, especially the carefully choreographed scenes showing Mike and Sulley’s growing friendship.

Read the full review →
Vulture
20 June 2013 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Ebiri finds the prequel funny, fast, and likable, but ultimately a disappointment beside the original. He praises its visual surprises and offhand gags, while faulting its reliance on familiar underdog-story beats.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Monsters University worth watching?
Monsters University is worth watching for a warm, funny family evening, and we score it 72 out of 100. Mike and Sullivan’s developing friendship and the inventive monster designs make it good company, though the familiar underdog competition and routine student pranks leave us wishing the story took more chances.
How long is Monsters University, and what is it rated?
Monsters University runs 1h 44m and is rated G by the MPA in the US. It is an animation and family film.
Where can I watch Monsters University in the US?
Monsters University is streaming on Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Monsters University compare to Kiki's Delivery Service?
Monsters University offers a busier college comedy, while Kiki’s Delivery Service is the gentler fantasy and earns our warmer recommendation for its humour and feeling. Both follow young hopefuls learning the limits of their abilities; we favour Monsters University for campus antics and an engaging friendship, but Kiki’s Delivery Service for its attention to the courage ordinary work requires.
What should I watch after Monsters University?
After Monsters University, try Kiki's Delivery Service (1989, Fi1m 86): Another young hopeful discovers that learning a job also means learning limits. Then Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84): An unlikely friendship, expressive animation and rather less patience for institutional rules; and School of Rock (2003, Fi1m 84): Misfit students find their strengths, with enough noise to excuse the familiar plotting.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2014

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 2013

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

Critics' Choice Awards, 2013

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Kiki's Delivery Service (1989, Fi1m 86)Another young hopeful discovers that learning a job also means learning limits.

  2. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)An unlikely friendship, expressive animation and rather less patience for institutional rules.

  3. School of Rock (2003, Fi1m 84)Misfit students find their strengths, with enough noise to excuse the familiar plotting.

  4. A Town Called Panic (2009) · not on Fi1m yetFor those who prefer the strange creatures and slapstick to the coursework.

  5. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)An unusual friendship carries the comedy, with considerably more emotional weight behind it.