George Gibbs (William Holden) and Emily Webb (Martha Scott) lean close beside a carved heart
Film review

Our Town

1940 · Directed by Sam Wood · 1h 30m

In a sentenceEveryone gets up at dawn and nobody notices they are happy

Grover’s Corners, New Hampshire, a spring morning in 1901. Mr Morgan (Frank Craven), who keeps the drugstore, walks us up the main street before dawn and names what we are looking at: Howie Newsome (Stuart Erwin) on his milk round, Doc Gibbs (Thomas Mitchell) coming home from delivering twins, two kitchens side by side where Mrs Gibbs (Fay Bainter) and Mrs Webb (Beulah Bondi) get breakfast on the table. Upstairs, Georges Gibbs (William Holden), who means to farm, calls across the gap between the houses for help with his algebra, and Emily Webb (Martha Scott), the best student in her class, gives it. Mr Webb (Guy Kibbee) edits the paper. The choir practises under an organist who drinks. Mrs Gibbs has come into some money and would like, once, to see Paris.

Fi1m review

Sam Wood’s film of Thornton Wilder’s play keeps the narrator, the two kitchens and Aaron Copland’s plain, hymn-like score, and for an hour it is quietly affecting. Then it loses its nerve in a way we will not describe. Worth an evening, with that reservation.

Thornton Wilder wrote Our Town for a stage with nothing on it: two ladders, some chairs, a stage manager who tells the audience where the houses are and asks them to imagine the rest. Sam Wood’s film gives the town back its houses, its fences and its main street, and the question it has to answer is whether Grover’s Corners survives being seen. For an hour it does, and rather beautifully. The last half hour is where the film and the play part company, and we will come to that, but the verdict first: this is a careful, well-acted and often moving picture that would be better if it trusted its author to the end.

Frank Craven, who played the narrator on Broadway and shares the writing credit here with Wilder and Harry Chandlee, is the film’s best idea. His Mr Morgan keeps the drugstore, and he also walks the empty street before dawn telling us the population, the churches and the price of a house, looking straight into the lens like a man who has been asked to show a visitor round and has done it too often to hurry. It should not work on film. It does, because Craven never plays it as a device. He simply knows things, including things that have not happened yet, and lets them drop.

The town is two kitchens. In one, Mrs Gibbs (Fay Bainter) makes breakfast for Doc Gibbs (Thomas Mitchell), home from delivering twins; in the other Mrs Webb (Beulah Bondi) does the same for Mr Webb (Guy Kibbee), who edits the paper. Bainter has the scene we would keep above all the others, in which she tells her neighbour over the string beans that she has been left some money and would like, once in her life, to see Paris, and Bondi listens as if this were a slightly indecent thing to want. Upstairs, Georges Gibbs (William Holden) shouts across the gap between the houses for help with his algebra and Emily (Martha Scott) gives it, with conditions. Holden is gangly and eager and not yet the actor he became. Scott is playing a schoolgirl and is plainly not one, and the film does not mind.

The scene that got past our guard is in the drugstore. Georges has walked Emily home from school and, trying to apologise for something, buys her a strawberry ice cream soda he cannot afford, and over the glasses he tells her he is not going away to agricultural college after all. Nothing is declared. Wood keeps the camera on the two of them at the counter, Craven pottering behind them, and lets it happen in the pauses. It moved us more than we expected, and we think it was the pottering: a man polishing a glass while two children decide their lives.

Bert Glennon photographs the daylight scenes plainly, morning sun through clean windows, and William Cameron Menzies’s town is convincing without being pretty, all clapboard and slightly too-wide streets. Aaron Copland’s score is the other thing the film gets exactly right. It is built from hymn tunes and long held notes on strings, and it comes in under the narration like weather rather than a cue. Edward P. Lambert dresses everyone in the same three shades of grey and brown, so that Emily’s white wedding dress is the first strong thing you have seen. Sherman Todd cuts slowly, sometimes too slowly; the wedding, in which Georges panics before the service and his mother talks him down, goes on a beat past its point.

The film’s trouble is that it likes the town more than Wilder did. The play has a drunk in it, the choirmaster Simon Stimson, and Philip Wood plays him well, but the film gives him a scene and then puts him away. Doro Merande’s Mrs Soames chatters agreeably where on the page she is a small comic monster. And in the last half hour, when Glennon’s light goes soft and pale and faces are lit from nowhere in particular, the film arrives at the place the play was built to reach and then, at the very last, changes course. We will not say how. We will say that anyone who knows the play will notice, and that Wilder’s ending was the braver one.

Ninety minutes, then, of milk rounds, homework and choir practice, done with more care than this sort of material usually gets, and one large flinch at the end. Watch it for Craven, Bainter and Copland, and if you know the play, be ready for the last five minutes to make you cross.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
The New York Times
14 June 1940 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The film is a beautiful and tender picture that captures the simple beauties and truths of humble folks as few pictures ever do. It is rich and ennobling in its plain philosophy.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 June 1940 · John C. Mosher
70*

The beauty of the film made from Wilder's Pulitzer Prize winner owes much to its distinguished literary quality and Sam Wood's direction. The movie's unusual form may bewilder some viewers but offers a distinguished take on small-town life.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1939 · Variety Staff
70*

The film version is an artistic offering that utilizes the simple and philosophical form of the stage piece, excellently written, directed, acted and mounted. It unfolds the unhurried life of a rural New England village at a deliberately slow tempo.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TM
60*

The critic describes it as an amiable but slightly expurgated adaptation that turns into a tolerably banal account of small-town life. It is rescued from cosiness by pleasant performances, Aaron Copland's score and the director's meticulous attention to detail.

Read the full review →
/Film
5 March 2026 · Jeremy Smith
80*

The critic highlights the film's timeless exploration of life, love, community, and death, noting how its quiet nobility and direct address to the audience resonate with performers and viewers alike. The adaptation stays true to Wilder's play while using sets and cinematography to enhance its ethereal mood.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Our Town worth watching?
Our Town is worth an evening for anyone with patience for a slow, plain small-town drama, and we scored it 72. Frank Craven's narrator, Fay Bainter's kitchen scenes and Aaron Copland's hymn-like score carry the first hour with real feeling. The last five minutes lose their nerve in a way that will annoy anyone who knows Wilder's play.
How long is Our Town, and what is it rated?
Our Town runs 1h 30m. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Our Town in Peru?
Our Town is not on any streaming or rental service in Peru at the moment. It is available in 6 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Our Town compare to Dogville?
Our Town and Dogville share a stage device, a narrator walking us round a town whose houses we are asked to imagine, but they want opposite things from it. Wood's film is gentle and rather too fond of its town; von Trier's is cruel, repetitive and gruelling. Choose Our Town for warmth and ninety quiet minutes, Dogville if you can stand being worn down for a stronger payoff.
What should I watch after Our Town?
After Our Town, try Make Way for Tomorrow (1937, Fi1m 91): Beulah Bondi again, in a plain American family drama that refuses every comfort this one accepts. Then Meet Me in St. Louis (1944, Fi1m 87): A year in one household, the same era, with songs instead of a narrator; and Wild Strawberries (1957, Fi1m 88): An old man revisits the mornings of his youth; Bergman finishes what Wilder started.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1941

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Art Direction, Black and White
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound

If you liked this, try…

  1. Make Way for Tomorrow (1937, Fi1m 91)Beulah Bondi again, in a plain American family drama that refuses every comfort this one accepts.

  2. Meet Me in St. Louis (1944, Fi1m 87)A year in one household, the same era, with songs instead of a narrator.

  3. Wild Strawberries (1957, Fi1m 88)An old man revisits the mornings of his youth; Bergman finishes what Wilder started.

  4. The Tree of Wooden Clogs (1978, Fi1m 89)Village life over four seasons, non-professional cast, and nothing softened for anyone.

  5. Dogville (2003, Fi1m 74)Wilder’s bare stage and chalk outlines borrowed for a small town with no kindness in it.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever