woman in yellow dress walking across stone terrace overlooking sprawling city
Film review

Poor Things

2023 · Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos · 2h 21m

In a sentenceThe monster leaves the castle, tries everything twice, and outgrows every man in the film by the second course

London, in a Victorian age that never quite happened. Bella Baxter (Emma Stone) lives in the house of Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe), a surgeon with a stitched-together face whom she calls God. She has the body of a grown woman and the mind of a small child, and Godwin knows why. He hires a medical student, McCandles (Ramy Youssef), to record her progress, and the student grows attached to her. Then a lawyer, Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo), arrives with papers to sign and an offer to show her the world. She takes it. Yorgos Lanthimos directs from Tony McNamara’s screenplay, adapted from the novel; Christopher Abbott, Kathryn Hunter and Hanna Schygulla appear along the way.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Lanthimos’s Frankenstein comedy is the best-looking film he has made and the one most anxious to please. Emma Stone is remarkable in it, and the film runs out of new things to say about her a good half hour before it stops.

Bella Baxter lives in a large London house with Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe), a surgeon whose face is a patchwork of old stitches, and she calls him God. She has a woman’s body and a small child’s mind, and Godwin explains why quite early. He hires a medical student, McCandles (Ramy Youssef), to keep notes on her progress; a lawyer, Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo), turns up with papers and an offer to show her the world. Tony McNamara’s screenplay, adapted from the novel, follows her out of the house and across a Europe that never existed. It is the best-looking film Yorgos Lanthimos has made. It also wants badly to be liked.

James Price and Shona Heath have built the whole thing on stages. The sky over Lisbon is painted, the sea is a sheet of moving cloth, and a tram travels on a wire above rooftops that lean at the wrong angles. Robbie Ryan shoots the London house in black and white through a fisheye lens that bows the walls, and when Bella leaves the film goes into colour so heavy the rooms look lit from inside the furniture. Holly Waddington dresses Stone in sleeves the size of pillows, bloomers under a short jacket, nothing laced, the clothes of someone who has not yet been told to be ashamed.

Stone begins stiff-legged and open-mouthed, a toddler handed a full-grown body who would like to see what it breaks. Over 141 minutes she straightens, her sentences lengthen and she learns to lie, and she plays each stage as a complete person rather than a step towards the next. She reports on sex, which the film calls furious jumping, like a scientist reading out results. It is physical comedy first, and it is funny. Then there is a scene on the deck of a ship where she looks down at something we will not describe, and her face gives way in stages, and we were moved more than a film with this many jokes about self-pleasure had led us to expect.

Ruffalo plays Duncan as a cad who believes himself a rake, and for about an hour he is the funniest thing on screen. That is roughly when the character is meant to become tiresome, and he does, on schedule. Dafoe, under a face of scar tissue, gives Godwin a gentleness we did not expect; his account of his own father is the saddest thing in the film. Kathryn Hunter arrives late, small and hoarse, and takes charge of every scene she is in. Jerskin Fendrix’s score bends its strings flat and lets its piano wander out of tune, as though the instruments were learning to play while Bella learned to speak. It is the best idea in the film, and by the third city it has become a tic.

The argument is that a woman with no shame is a scandal to every man she meets, and the film makes it well in the first hour. Every man Bella encounters is a fool or a brute, or a fool who turns out to be a brute, and by the third we could draw the scene before it arrived. Yorgos Mavropsaridis cuts briskly inside each scene, but nobody seems to have asked whether every scene was needed, and 141 minutes is long for one lesson learned in several outfits. We caught ourselves waiting for the next set of clothes, and we were a little sorry about that.

Dogtooth and The Lobster were cold films, and the cold was the point. The Favourite, also written by McNamara, let some warmth in. Poor Things is warmer still, and it wants us to love it, which is new for Lanthimos, and the wanting shows. Jokes land and then the film holds for a beat, as if to check we got them.

It is an 18, and it earns the certificate in the first half hour, so choose your company. See it on the largest screen you can find; the sets were built to be looked at from a distance, and at home the repetitions are easier to count.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
3

Most critics like Poor Things a good deal, and nearly all of them like it for the same reason. Emma Stone’s performance as Bella Baxter is praised in almost every review, usually for its fearlessness and its comic timing, and several critics call it the best work she has done. The design, costumes and camerawork come a close second, with the film’s baroque, invented Victorian world described as inventive and a pleasure to look at.

Reservations among the admirers are about length: a handful of reviews say it runs long and could lose twenty minutes. The dissent is small but sharp. Film Comment finds the humour one-note and the ideas shallow; Vulture calls it a sterile, exhibitionist treatment of female sexuality; The Ringer and The New York Times both find it smug, arguing that it wants to be admired more than it wants to unsettle. Even the sceptics concede Stone and the visuals. The spread is wide, though weighted heavily towards the top.

Little White Lies
10 January 2024 · 5/5/5 · Savina Petkova
100

The critic calls it Lanthimos at his most playful and comedic, praising Emma Stone's career-defining performance as Bella Baxter in this opulent provocation about the body as a nexus for pleasure and pain.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 January 2024 · Wendy Ide
90*

The critic finds the film a funny, filthy and explosively inventive spin on Frankenstein driven by Stone's courageous performance as Bella. The inventive design, score and camerawork create a carnival of oddness that mirrors the character's voyage of discovery.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
12 January 2024 · ★★★★ · James Mottram
80

The critic highlights Emma Stone's remarkable performance in this eccentric and uncanny fable, noting it shows Lanthimos as the master purveyor of the strange and surreal, though it could use some trimming.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Beatrice Loayza
40*

The critic describes the film as a lavishly designed steampunk fantasia of feminist wish fulfillment with inventive aesthetics, but finds it conceptually boring and repetitive in its one-note humor and shallow thematic treatment.

Read the full review →
Vulture
15 December 2023
30*

The critic finds the film a sterile, exhibitionist take on female sexuality that fails as a sincere treatise, reducing empowerment to surface-level provocation and a male auteur's limited vision. While acknowledging visual and costuming strengths, the review deems the narrative and spiritual hollowness ultimately ugly.

Read the full review →
Empire
13 December 2023 · John Nugent

The critic calls the film absolutely batshit, utterly filthy and a true original. They single out Emma Stone's richest, most interesting and fearless performance as Bella.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Poor Things worth watching?
Poor Things is worth watching for anyone who wants Emma Stone at full stretch inside the best-looking film Yorgos Lanthimos has made, and we scored it 76. The reservation is length: the argument about a woman without shame is made well in the first hour, then repeated across several cities and outfits for another hour and more. See it on a large screen, where the painted skies and leaning rooftops earn their keep.
How long is Poor Things, and what is it rated?
Poor Things runs 2h 21m. It is a science fiction and romance film.
Where can I watch Poor Things in Panama?
Poor Things is streaming on Disney+ in Panama. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Poor Things, and is it suitable for children?
Poor Things is an 18 in the UK and R in the US, and it earns the certificate within the first half hour, so it is not for children or younger teenagers. There is a great deal of frank sex, discussed and shown, alongside surgical imagery and a stitched-together face or two. It is not a frightening film so much as an explicit one, so choose your company.
How does Poor Things compare to The Favourite?
Poor Things is the warmer and grander of the two Lanthimos films written by Tony McNamara, and The Favourite is the more disciplined. Both give Emma Stone room to be very funny, but the earlier film knows when to stop, while this one runs a good half hour past its last new idea. If you want the sets and the transformation, choose this; if you want the sharper comedy, the earlier film is better.
Is Poor Things based on a true story or a book?
Poor Things is adapted from a novel by Alasdair Gray, not from a true story, though it borrows the bones of Frankenstein: a surgeon, a made woman, a world she has to learn from scratch. You do not need to know the book, since Tony McNamara's screenplay explains Bella's origins early and plainly. The Victorian Europe on screen never existed and is not meant to have.
What should I watch after Poor Things?
After Poor Things, try The Favourite (2018, Fi1m 87): Lanthimos and McNamara’s earlier collaboration, with Stone, and rather better at knowing when to stop. Then Bride of Frankenstein (1935, Fi1m 89): The made woman who says no; seventy-five minutes and not a wasted one; and Daisies (1966, Fi1m 85): Two Czech girls decide to be spoiled and wreck a banquet; anarchic, short and colourful.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2024

Nominated
Best Picture
Won
Best Production Design

Amanda Award for Best Foreign Feature Film, 2024

Won
Amanda Award for Best Foreign Feature Film

FIPRESCI Grand Prix, 2024

Won
FIPRESCI Grand Prix

Golden Globes, 2023

Won
Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy

Venice Film Festival, 2023

Won
Golden Lion

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Favourite (2018, Fi1m 87)Lanthimos and McNamara’s earlier collaboration, with Stone, and rather better at knowing when to stop.

  2. Bride of Frankenstein (1935, Fi1m 89)The made woman who says no; seventy-five minutes and not a wasted one.

  3. Daisies (1966, Fi1m 85)Two Czech girls decide to be spoiled and wreck a banquet; anarchic, short and colourful.

  4. Being There (1979, Fi1m 84)An innocent walks into the world and the world mistakes him for a sage.

  5. Orlando (1992, Fi1m 81)Tilda Swinton lives four centuries and changes sex; painted England, dry as a biscuit.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever