Jackie Chan as Lee braces himself across a narrow corridor
Film review

Rush Hour 2

2001 · Directed by Brett Ratner · 1h 30m · BBFC 12

In a sentenceJackie Chan can escape almost anything except a conversation with Chris Tucker

In Hong Kong, Yan Naing Lee (Jackie Chan) has the American James Carter (Chris Tucker) for company. Carter keeps up a running commentary while Lee handles physical confrontations, and the two men have different habits to accommodate. Ricky Tan (John Lone) and Hu Li (Zhang Ziyi) also figure in the crime story. An early fight puts Lee’s physical skills to work, while Carter’s remarks about the people around him keep bringing the differences between the two men into their conversations.

Fi1m review

Jackie Chan’s acrobatics and his rapport with Chris Tucker make Rush Hour 2 a decent diversion for the already persuaded. The thin plotting and repetitive racial jokes leave everyone else with less to enjoy.

Brett Ratner has the right pair for an action comedy, and Rush Hour 2 still gets some mileage from putting Jackie Chan beside Chris Tucker. We would call it a decent diversion for existing admirers, with the physical comedy doing most of the work. The partnership survives a thin crime story and a supply of jokes that too often take racial difference as sufficient reason to laugh. At 90 minutes, it asks for a modest investment of time, though there are stretches when the chatter makes it feel longer.

We were disappointed by the opening fight: Jackie Chan’s movement is graceful, but the sequence gives it too little comic invention. His acrobatic slapstick remains the chief pleasure, especially when physical effort becomes part of the joke. He can make a difficult movement look controlled without removing the sense of a body doing something difficult. That is a useful quality in an action comedy, and Brett Ratner too often seems content simply to have it available.

Chris Tucker supplies energy without much variation, and Jeff Nathanson’s screenplay does not give him enough fresh material. The running commentary works when it meets resistance from his partner; left to carry a scene, it becomes wearing. Jokes about Asian stature are particularly feeble, asking recognition of a difference to do the work of a comic idea. We do not need James Carter to become polite, but we do need the next exchange to offer something the previous one did not.

Zhang Ziyi gives Hu Li a forcefulness that helps interrupt that routine. She holds our attention without competing with Chris Tucker’s volume, which is a relief. The chemistry between the leads is still persuasive, and it would be unfair to pretend that familiarity has removed every pleasure from their company. There is simply too little in the crime story to occupy us when the partnership stops being funny.

Matthew F. Leonetti’s cinematography is most rewarding when Jackie Chan’s movement is the attraction. The Las Vegas battle has a welcome scale, with Terence Marsh’s production design giving the action surroundings worth noticing. Those passages make a stronger case for the film than the exchanges between fights, even if the action itself is not consistently inventive. For this sort of comedy, the physical business needs to keep surprising us, and here it sometimes settles for keeping us occupied.

Mark Helfrich and Robert K. Lambert’s editing keeps the film brisk without solving that repetition. The same weaknesses recur even when the cutting hurries us along, and the film rarely lets a comic exchange develop beyond its first provocation. Lalo Schifrin’s music adds energy, though excitement is not what the film lacks. A little less insistence would give the performers more room to make the comedy work.

The outtakes are a further pleasure, although it is awkward when mistakes are funnier than portions of the script. They remind us how appealing these performers can be when a laugh does not feel compulsory. Anyone coming chiefly for Jackie Chan’s physical comedy should allow for a fair amount of shouting between fights.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

52
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The reviews lean towards mixed and negative, though even several detractors find something to enjoy in the performers. Praise clusters around Jackie Chan’s physical comedy, his chemistry with Chris Tucker, and Zhang Ziyi’s forceful screen presence. Chan’s acrobatic slapstick and individual action sequences provide the most consistent pleasures, while Zhang earns approval across otherwise sharply divided assessments. The central partnership still works for several critics who find the sequel disappointing.

The disagreement is over how much those strengths compensate for repetition, thin plotting and abrasive humour. Variety regards the familiar formula as a strength and finds the sequel superior; Empire thinks it loses the original’s fun and is less entertaining than its outtakes. Elsewhere, reservations focus on Tucker overwhelming Chan, race-based jokes that grate, and action that lacks invention. The spread is wide: the same familiarity reads as enjoyable continuity to some critics and a dispiriting rehash to others.

Variety
27 July 2001 · Robert Koehler
85*

Koehler praises the sequel as a superior, energetic action comedy that preserves the original’s winning formula. He singles out Chan and Tucker’s chemistry and Zhang Ziyi’s screen presence, while noting that the first fight disappoints.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 August 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds it enjoyable, though it requires some indulgence even from Jackie Chan fans. He praises Zhang Yiyi’s striking presence as an action heroine.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 July 2001 · Emanuel Levy
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the paywall shell does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no readable detail about what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 August 2001
64*

The page appears to be a review of Rush Hour 2, but its text is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the available page.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
60*

The critic finds the film intermittently entertaining but misses Jackie Chan’s earlier knockabout charm. The action set-pieces, especially the Las Vegas battle, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Rush Hour 2 worth watching?
Rush Hour 2 is a decent diversion for admirers of Jackie Chan’s physical comedy and his partnership with Chris Tucker; we score it 61 out of 100. The acrobatics and rapport offer enough pleasure for the already persuaded, but the thin crime story, repetitive racial jokes and persistent shouting make it harder to recommend beyond that audience.
How long is Rush Hour 2, and what is it rated?
Rush Hour 2 runs 1h 30m and is rated 12 by the BBFC in the UK. It is an action and comedy film.
Where can I watch Rush Hour 2 in the UK?
Rush Hour 2 is streaming on HBO Max and Amazon Prime Video in the UK, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from £3.49. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Rush Hour 2, and is it suitable for children?
Rush Hour 2 has a UK 12 certificate and features physical confrontations and acrobatic slapstick, making it a better fit for older children and teenagers than younger viewers. The fighting is part of its action-comedy appeal, but we would also flag the repetitive racial jokes as a consideration for parents, rather than treating violence as the only suitability concern.
How does Rush Hour 2 compare to Midnight Run?
Rush Hour 2 is the weaker comedy beside Midnight Run, which we recommend for warmer, funnier quarrelling between its incompatible leads. Jackie Chan’s acrobatic slapstick is the main reason to choose Rush Hour 2; Midnight Run gives Robert De Niro and Charles Grodin’s conversations room to develop, making the exchanges themselves a greater pleasure.
What should I watch after Rush Hour 2?
After Rush Hour 2, try Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88): Two incompatible men make the arguments as entertaining as the pursuit. Then The General (1926, Fi1m 91): Physical comedy built around movement, danger and knowing exactly where to stand; and Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84): A police partnership with sharper jokes and considerably more attention to its crime.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2002

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Police Story (1985) · not reviewed yetJackie Chan gets more room for the physical invention that matters here.

  2. Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88)Two incompatible men make the arguments as entertaining as the pursuit.

  3. The General (1926, Fi1m 91)Physical comedy built around movement, danger and knowing exactly where to stand.

  4. Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84)A police partnership with sharper jokes and considerably more attention to its crime.

  5. Veteran (2015) · not reviewed yetBrisk Korean crime comedy with a forceful sense of who deserves the bruises.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever