A rescue worker descends on a cable through a collapsing building as a helicopter approaches
Film review

San Andreas

2015 · Directed by Brad Peyton · 1h 54m

In a sentenceDwayne Johnson commandeers a helicopter, a plane and a boat to find one daughter while several million Californians fend for themselves

Ray Gaines (Dwayne Johnson) flies a rescue helicopter for the Los Angeles fire department. His wife Emma (Carla Gugino) has filed for divorce and is moving in with Daniel Riddick (Ioan Gruffudd), a San Francisco property developer; their daughter Blake (Alexandra Daddario) is about to leave for university. Ray plans to drive her north himself, but a tremor at the Hoover Dam, where seismologist Lawrence Hayes (Paul Giamatti) is testing a method of predicting earthquakes, calls him away, and Daniel flies Blake to San Francisco instead. There she meets Ben Taylor (Hugo Johnstone-Burt), an Englishman in town for a job interview, and his young brother Ollie (Art Parkinson). Then the San Andreas fault gives way along its whole length, and Ray and Emma set off north to find their daughter.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Brad Peyton flattens Los Angeles and San Francisco with real skill and a rooftop pool we will not forget, then asks us to care about one family’s divorce. Johnson and Giamatti hold it up; the script keeps letting go.

Brad Peyton’s San Andreas takes 114 minutes to break California in half, and for most of them it is good at the breaking. The idea, from a story by Jeremy Passmore and Andre Fabrizio, is the old one: a record earthquake hits the West Coast, and we follow a handful of people through it. Carlton Cuse’s screenplay narrows that handful to one family with a divorce to mend. The buildings come down convincingly. The marriage does not.

Ray Gaines (Dwayne Johnson) flies a rescue helicopter for the Los Angeles fire department, and the film opens with him winching a woman out of a car hanging over a canyon edge, which is what he will be doing for the next two hours. His wife Emma (Carla Gugino) has served him divorce papers and is moving in with a property developer, Daniel Riddick (Ioan Gruffudd). Their daughter Blake (Alexandra Daddario) is off to university in San Francisco. Johnson plays all of this quietly, as a big man who has decided to be hurt in private, and he is better at it than the script requires.

Lawrence Hayes (Paul Giamatti), a seismologist, has built a model that can predict earthquakes and tests it at the Hoover Dam at the wrong moment. Giamatti is the other reason to stay. He plays Hayes as a tired man who has been right for years and is sorry about it, and the film has the sense to stand him before a screen and let him say frightening things slowly. His scenes with Will Yun Lee as Dr Kim Park and Archie Panjabi as the reporter Serena Johnson are the only ones where anybody appears to be thinking.

The destruction is the film, and it is handled with care. Barry Chusid’s production design gives Los Angeles glass towers to fold and San Francisco a waterfront to lose, and Steve Yedlin keeps the camera at street level or inside the helicopter, so the scale comes from looking up or down. When Ray flies to a rooftop to pull Emma off a collapsing tower, and the pool froths and tips its water over the edge, we sat forward and stopped hearing the dialogue. It is the best image in the film, and Bob Ducsay holds it long enough. Andrew Lockington’s score pounds under all of it, mostly at the right moments.

What does not work is the dialogue, and the shape the film gives the catastrophe. Cuse’s lines mean precisely what they say and the actors deliver them as if they know it. Worse, the film has decided that of the millions in two cities, four matter, and arranges the disaster around their reunion. Buildings fall on strangers so that Ray and Emma can discuss their marriage in a helicopter. By the second hour we were bored, then irritated at being bored while a city sank, because the film kept cutting away to check whether the Gaineses had made up yet.

Daddario carries the San Francisco half with Hugo Johnstone-Burt as Ben Taylor and Art Parkinson as his younger brother Ollie. Theirs is the lightest strand and the most watchable, because Blake is allowed to be competent rather than carried and Parkinson gets the few jokes Cuse wrote. Gruffudd is handed a coward and plays him. Kylie Minogue appears as his sister Susan for one scene and is then forgotten. Wendy Chuck’s costumes stay sensibly torn and dusty throughout.

Against the disaster films it copies, the 1974 Earthquake above all, it is better built and less interested in people. Those films were crowded, and the crowd was the point: you watched a dozen strangers and waited to see which of them the building would take. This one has a family and a seismologist, and once you notice how carefully it looks after them the suspense drains out, with an hour still to run.

See it for the pool, for Giamatti, and for what the sea does to the Golden Gate Bridge, which we will leave you to discover. See it at home, where you can talk over the dialogue without missing anything. The 12A is right: a great deal falls down and almost none of it bleeds.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

50
Positive
3
Mixed
12
Negative
11

Most critics agree on what San Andreas does well and what it does badly; they differ only on which matters more. The effects draw praise almost everywhere, with the collapsing skyscrapers and the tsunami at the Golden Gate Bridge named most often. Dwayne Johnson is the other point of agreement: even reviews that dislike the film credit his steadiness, and a few find him surprisingly gentle. Paul Giamatti picks up mentions as the best thing in it.

The reservations cluster on the script and the family drama, which most find thin and an awkward fit for the destruction around them. From there the spread is wide. A minority enjoy the silliness in the spirit of 1970s disaster films; a larger group find it numbing, with Little White Lies calling it dull and Deadline unintentionally funny. Slant goes further, calling the film cynical for using mass death as a backdrop to reuniting a family, and Empire and Eye for Film object to its women being reduced to victims awaiting rescue.

Evening Standard
29 May 2015 · David Sexton
75*

Sexton finds it a thrilling, satisfying disaster movie, though its dialogue is unremarkable. He particularly praises Dwayne Johnson’s understated, gentle performance.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
27 May 2015 · B- · Kate Erbland
70

The review finds the film a predictable, overstuffed disaster movie that is entertaining largely because of Dwayne Johnson. It praises the jaw-dropping CGI and Johnson’s screen presence, while noting the screenplay can cause audience fatigue.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 May 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds the film spectacularly silly and entertaining, recalling the pleasures of 1970s disaster movies. He singles out the rooftop pool frothing like a Jacuzzi as a memorable visual moment.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
27 May 2015 · John Hazelton
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review, but provides no verdict. Its specific praise or complaint is unavailable because the article is paywalled.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 May 2015
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its headline describes Johnson rushing to rescue a collapsing world, but provides no evaluative detail.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
63*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint are unavailable. The URL identifies this as a RogerEbert.com review of the 2015 film.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is San Andreas worth watching?
San Andreas is worth watching only for its destruction, and we scored it 54. The toppling of Los Angeles and San Francisco is handled with real care, and Dwayne Johnson and Paul Giamatti give it more than the script asks, but the film arranges a catastrophe around one family's divorce and the suspense drains out with an hour to run. Watch it at home, where the dialogue can be talked over.
How long is San Andreas, and what is it rated?
San Andreas runs 1h 54m. It is an action and drama film.
Where can I watch San Andreas in New Zealand?
San Andreas is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in New Zealand, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from NZ$5.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is San Andreas, and is it suitable for children?
San Andreas is a 12A, and the certificate is right: a great deal falls down and almost none of it bleeds. The frightening parts are buildings folding, a rooftop pool tipping over the edge and the sea reaching the Golden Gate Bridge, all scale rather than gore. Children of ten or so who can take two hours of peril should be fine; the very young or easily unsettled may not be.
How does San Andreas compare to The Towering Inferno?
San Andreas is better built than The Towering Inferno and much less interested in people. The seventies film is crowded, with a dozen strangers trapped above the flames, and that crowd is what makes its first ninety minutes properly frightening; the newer film follows one family and a seismologist and looks after them too carefully. Allen's is the better film, though it is 165 minutes long and its people are duller than its fire.
What should I watch after San Andreas?
After San Andreas, try The Towering Inferno (1974, Fi1m 68): The crowded model this film copied, with a dozen strangers and a lift shaft. Then The Impossible (2012, Fi1m 72): The 2004 tsunami through one family, with Naomi Watts in a hospital bed; and Twister (1996, Fi1m 64): Weather as monster, a divorce to mend, and far better jokes.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Towering Inferno (1974, Fi1m 68)The crowded model this film copied, with a dozen strangers and a lift shaft.

  2. The Wave (2015) · not reviewed yetA Norwegian fjord, one small town, and a disaster film that counts its dead.

  3. Aftershock (2010) · not reviewed yetFeng Xiaogang’s Tangshan earthquake drama, where the quake ends early and the grief does not.

  4. The Impossible (2012, Fi1m 72)The 2004 tsunami through one family, with Naomi Watts in a hospital bed.

  5. Twister (1996, Fi1m 64)Weather as monster, a divorce to mend, and far better jokes.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever