A man carries an unconscious woman through swirling smoke
Film review

Starman

1984 · Directed by John Carpenter · 1h 55m

In a sentenceJeff Bridges makes being human look difficult, which seems fair enough

Voyager II is launched in 1977 carrying an invitation for other lifeforms to visit Earth. An alien visitor, Starman (Jeff Bridges), answers it and begins learning about human life. His story involves Jenny Hayden (Karen Allen) and Mark Shermin (Charles Martin Smith). The invitation promises a welcome, but understanding the people of Earth is another matter. The visitor has to discover how they behave and what they feel. His introduction to the planet becomes a romance, with human affection among the unfamiliar things he encounters and must learn to understand.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jeff Bridges makes John Carpenter’s gentle alien romance worth forgiving for its predictable plot. Karen Allen gives the sentiment weight, and the film’s patience with its visitor keeps the familiar storytelling from becoming a serious obstacle.

Starman is a gentle, funny science-fiction romance whose predictable story is worth forgiving for Jeff Bridges. John Carpenter gives the alien visitor’s attempts to understand human life the attention they deserve. The premise offers few surprises, and he does not waste much effort pretending otherwise. The film asks us to care about someone who does not know how to be one of us, then gives its leading actor enough freedom to make that interesting.

Bridges makes the alien’s curiosity the reason to keep watching. His childlike performance could have become a collection of endearing habits, but there is enough seriousness in the learning to keep the comedy from taking over. We were moved by his efforts to understand human behaviour, because Bridges makes the visitor’s trust feel easily hurt. The performance allows affection to develop without insisting that everything an innocent creature does must be charming.

Karen Allen, as Jenny Hayden, is essential to making the romance work. She gives the feeling enough weight that we can believe in it even when the story asks for considerable indulgence. A less convincing partner would leave Bridges performing an engaging solo act, with everyone else waiting for his next discovery. Allen gives us a reason to care about the relationship, and Carpenter is wise to let the actors carry so much of it.

Donald M. Morgan’s cinematography helps us stay attentive to the performers, which is the right priority for this kind of science fiction. Daniel A. Lomino’s production design also supports the fantasy without competing too fiercely for our attention. Neither contribution is the main attraction, and that suits a romance this dependent on its cast. The film is most persuasive when we are watching the visitor learn, with nothing else demanding to be admired.

Marion Rothman’s editing allows the gentler comedy to register, though the pace cannot always conceal how familiar the plotting is. Jack Nitzsche’s music is effective at encouraging tenderness, less necessary when the performances have already persuaded us. There are stretches where the film gives its feeling more assistance than it needs. Still, Carpenter’s handling of the romance is sufficiently restrained that the sentiment rarely becomes an instruction to be moved.

Raynold Gideon and Bruce A. Evans give the actors a romance worth playing, but too little else to surprise us. Too much is easy to anticipate, and some of the characterisation feels like the minimum required to get the story moving. A science-fiction romance need not keep producing surprises, but it does need difficulties that feel particular to these people. Here, Bridges often supplies the individuality that the writing has left out.

Carpenter understands how much interest there is in watching the visitor learn about people. The film’s kindness matters, especially when Bridges makes understanding another person look like something requiring effort. At 115 minutes, it takes a little longer than its simple story needs. Choose it for the company of its two leads; anyone hoping to be surprised should make other arrangements.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Starman as a science-fiction romance, with praise centred on Jeff Bridges’s performance as an alien learning about human life. His gentle, childlike manner gives the film much of its appeal, and the favourable reviews find humour and feeling in the romantic story. Carpenter’s restrained handling of emotion also earns appreciation, although Bridges is the clearest point of agreement among the positive notices.

The reservations concern the writing: even some admirers find the plotting predictable or one-dimensional. The spread is fairly wide, with Variety judging the film only partly successful and finding that its use of effective borrowed models leaves it short of originality. Time Out is the strongest dissenter, dismissing the science-fiction love story as weak; the divide is chiefly over how much the performances and emotional appeal compensate for a familiar story.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones describes the film as an engaging, funny, suspenseful and moving sci-fi romance. He particularly praises Jeff Bridges’s chance to stretch his acting talent as an alien learning about human life.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 December 1984 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert’s review is positive, finding the film an appealing romantic science-fiction story. He particularly praises Jeff Bridges’s performance as the alien visitor.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 December 2016 · Duane Byrge
75*

The critic gives the film a positive verdict, calling it appealing and humane despite some one-dimensional plotting. He particularly praises Jeff Bridges’s gentle, childlike performance as the alien.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 December 1984 · Janet Maslin
70*

The headline suggests a favorable view of the film, describing its alien character as ingratiating. It singles out Jeff Bridges’s performance, though the article text was inaccessible.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 January 1985 · Pauline Kael
64*

The issue identifies this as part of a review of three films, but the critic’s verdict is not available here. The page provides no specific praise or complaint about “Starman.”

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1984 · Variety Staff
45*

The review finds the film only partly successful, despite its effective borrowed models. It praises those models but faults the film for lacking originality.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Starman worth watching?
Starman is worth watching for its gentle science-fiction romance and the performances of Jeff Bridges and Karen Allen; we score it 77 out of 100. Bridges makes learning to be human funny and unexpectedly moving, while Allen gives the relationship weight. The plotting is predictable and the pace leisurely, so choose it for the actors rather than surprises.
How long is Starman, and what is it rated?
Starman runs 1h 55m. It is a science fiction and drama film.
Where can I watch Starman in South Africa?
Starman is streaming on Netflix in South Africa. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Starman compare to A Matter of Life and Death?
Starman is the more modest recommendation beside A Matter of Life and Death, which we find easier to recommend widely for its humour, feeling and visual imagination. Both make an impossible romance feel human, but Starman depends more heavily on its leads to compensate for familiar plotting. Choose it for Bridges and Allen; we favour the other film for its broader pleasures.
What should I watch after Starman?
After Starman, try A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): A romance that makes room for the impossible without forgetting ordinary human feeling. Then Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88): Another outsider discovers that understanding human life requires more than watching it; and The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): A visitor’s innocence gives this science-fiction friendship its humour and its considerable feeling.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1985

Nominated
Best Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)A romance that makes room for the impossible without forgetting ordinary human feeling.

  2. Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88)Another outsider discovers that understanding human life requires more than watching it.

  3. The Brother from Another Planet (1984) · not reviewed yetAn alien’s arrival makes familiar human behaviour look strange, funny and frequently unkind.

  4. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)A visitor’s innocence gives this science-fiction friendship its humour and its considerable feeling.

  5. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)For the patient romance, and the care taken over two people learning about each other.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever