Film review

The Furious

2026 · Directed by Kenji Tanigaki · 1h 53m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe dialogue needs work, but nobody should attempt a rewrite while someone is swinging a motorcycle

ActionCrimeThriller

A kidnapped child brings two men into a fight against a human-trafficking network in Kenji Tanigaki’s action thriller. Xie Miao plays Wang Wei and Joe Taslim plays Navin, the pair taking on the people who stand between them and those they want to save. Their search leads into a succession of physical confrontations, with martial arts driving the story. Yang Enyou appears as Rainy, alongside Yayan Ruhian as Tak, JeeJa Yanin as Matia and Brian Le as Ho. The film centres on rescue and revenge, with violence carrying much of the action.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kenji Tanigaki’s The Furious earns our recommendation through inventive, punishing fights and the clarity with which it shows them. The thin kidnapping story and awkward dialogue matter, but they seldom get long enough to spoil the evening.

The Furious knows why most people have come, and Kenji Tanigaki gets on with providing it. A kidnapping and a trafficking network give Xie Miao and Joe Taslim a reason to join forces, with little time spent making that reason unusual. We recommend it for the fighting, which is inventive enough to sustain a film that runs for 113 minutes. The writing supplies less pleasure, and the pauses between bouts can feel like time spent waiting for the actors to stop talking.

Tanigaki understands that a fight needs more than people hitting harder as it goes on. These sequences keep changing what the performers can do, particularly when objects are brought into the combat. A motorcycle becomes something to swing at an opponent, an absurd escalation carried off with enough physical conviction to make us wince. We laughed, then winced again. The joke works because the choreography makes the weight of the thing matter, even while the idea of using it this way remains ridiculous.

Meteor Cheung’s cinematography gives us wide views and extended takes, with room to follow the performers’ movements. There is pleasure in seeing the work, and in having enough space in the image to appreciate how one movement leads to another. Chris Tonick’s editing keeps the fights moving without making them difficult to read. That clarity is crucial: the choreography is busy enough without a cut requiring us to work out where everybody has gone.

The sound effects give the blows a nasty force of their own. Olivia Xiaolin and Flying Lotus are credited with the music, but the impacts are what stayed with us. This is violent entertainment that means to be felt physically, and the coordination of movement, cutting and sound largely makes that happen. There is a limit to how often another heavy blow can provide a fresh sensation, though, and the relentless tempo occasionally lets one fight blur into the next.

The weaknesses become harder to ignore when the film asks its characters to explain themselves. The screenplay, credited to Frank Hui, Shum Kwan-Sin, Lei Zhilong and Mak Tin-Shu, does little to make the kidnapping story feel particular to these people. Supporting characters remain sketchy, and the awkward dialogue is not helped by uneven dubbing. A familiar rescue plot can keep an action film brisk, but here the lack of definition also limits how much we care about anyone outside a fight.

Against the standards of martial-arts cinema, this is a strong recommendation with a familiar reservation. Xie and Taslim are persuasive in motion, and Tanigaki allows the physical difficulty of what they are doing to hold our attention. He trusts the audience to enjoy coordination and timing as much as damage. That matters in a genre where the pleasure can come from recognising how much skill it takes to make a brawl look uncontrolled.

This is an 18-certificate film, and its brutality is a considerable part of the appeal. Anyone hoping the rescue story will provide much relief from the fighting should take that seriously. For an evening of martial arts, we recommend it with patience for the dialogue and a firm warning about the violence.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

85
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive: critics praise The Furious chiefly for the invention, precision and physical force of its martial-arts action. Praise clusters around Kenji Tanigaki’s staging and the fight choreography, with wide shots, longer takes and escalating set pieces allowing the performers’ movement to carry the film. The familiar kidnapping plot is generally treated as sufficient preparation for the fighting, though some reviews find its simplicity actively helps the pace.

The differences concern how much the shortcomings matter, rather than whether the action delivers. Thin characterisation, weak dialogue and awkward dubbing recur as reservations, but rarely dampen the enthusiasm substantially. Variety treats those flaws as things genre fans may even treasure, while Sight and Sound finds the supporting characters weak and the climax mishandled; The Guardian, by contrast, singles out the closing half-hour for its sustained intensity.

Slant Magazine
10 June 2026 · ★★★★/4
100

Tanigaki’s action thriller is an ambitiously staged brawler that understands narrative simplicity is key to a relentless, propulsive action movie. It features some of the most dazzling martial arts sequences in recent memory and is sure to be the fastest entry into the genre canon since Mad Max: Fury Road.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 June 2026 · Amy Nicholson
85*

The action scenes are like nothing else in the multiplex and the sole reason to watch, with creative fight choreography that could change how Hollywood throws a punch. The rote kidnapped-child plot is ignored in favor of gawking at the innovative brawls in this Asian action spectacular.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 June 2026
85*

The critic finds Kenji Tanigaki’s martial-arts action film exhilarating, with a closing half-hour of unmatched pummelling intensity that exceeds its Taken-like setup. They single out the precise, inventive fight choreography and technical skill in the set pieces.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 June 2026 · B+ · Jacob Oller
83

The film distills cinema down to sound effects and whirling motion in a pan-Asian Hong Kong action style with blistering tempo and virtuosic movement. Despite some dubbing issues, it is one of the most fluid and satisfying action movies in recent memory.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 July 2026 · Harry Stainer
80*

The critic praises the film's relentless martial-arts action and inventive fight choreography as a fun, over-the-top Hong Kong-style spectacle. They single out the creative escalation of the fights, particularly a mid-movie warehouse brawl featuring Brian Le.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 September 2025 · festival review
80*

The film is a bonkers showcase of incredible stunt and fight choreography that draws comparisons to The Raid and Night Comes for Us. Dialogue and plotting are silly and goofy, but none of that matters in action mode, with three-quarters of the runtime consisting of fighting.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Police Story poster

Police Story

1985 · For fights built around awkward spaces, vulnerable bodies and alarming comic timing.

The Raid poster

The Raid

2011 · Tighter confinement, clearer stakes and close combat that rarely permits a comfortable breath.

Chocolate poster

Chocolate

2008 · For acrobatic fights that turn the surrounding furniture into a health concern.

The Man from Nowhere poster

The Man from Nowhere

2010 · A rescue thriller with more patience for character before the violence takes over.

The Street Fighter poster

The Street Fighter

1974 · For older, rougher martial arts with little interest in making its violence polite.