Two figures stand silhouetted in a doorway overlooking the sea
Film review

The Ghost and Mrs. Muir

1947 · Directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz · 1h 45m

In a sentenceBeing dead does surprisingly little damage to Rex Harrison’s romantic prospects

Lucy Muir (Gene Tierney) encounters Capt. Daniel Gregg (Rex Harrison), a ghost whose presence brings the possibility of romance into her life. Their conversations draw her towards a relationship with someone who belongs to the dead. Alongside them are Martha Huggins (Edna Best) and the young Anna Muir (Natalie Wood). As Lucy and Gregg get to know each other, their attachment raises questions about what a future together could mean. There is also the possibility that the companion Lucy finds is a creation of her own imagination.

Fi1m review

Gene Tierney and Rex Harrison make this ghostly romance tender and persuasive, with Charles Lang’s close-ups and Bernard Herrmann’s music doing much of the work. Its leisurely pace needs patience, but the feeling earns it.

Joseph L. Mankiewicz takes an improbable romance seriously, and The Ghost and Mrs. Muir rewards that faith. This is a tender, persuasive film with a pace that sometimes tests our patience. The supernatural premise gives it something more interesting to consider than the mechanics of haunting: what Lucy Muir needs from the companion she finds. It gives the couple room to talk, and expects us to care about what passes between them.

Gene Tierney keeps Lucy at the centre even when Rex Harrison’s Capt. Daniel Gregg commands our attention. Her performance makes the human side of the relationship engaging enough that the ghost’s existence need not become a puzzle to be solved. Harrison brings authority to Gregg without making the romantic pairing feel overwhelmed by it. We believe that these two people find one another interesting, which is the first thing a romance has to establish and surprisingly often neglects.

Philip Dunne’s screenplay gives their conversations room for more than one reading. Gregg can be accepted as a ghost, or understood as an expression of Lucy’s imagination, without either possibility cancelling the pleasure of their company. That uncertainty makes us pay closer attention to her investment in the exchanges. The dialogue is worth listening to, though the film sometimes seems more confident than we are that another stretch of conversation will deepen the attachment.

Charles Lang’s photography is especially persuasive in the close-ups of the leads. We were moved by those faces: the attention given to them makes the longing in this unlikely relationship easy to recognise. The camera grants Lucy as much importance as the man with the supernatural advantage, so the romance never depends entirely on our fascination with him. The beauty of the images helps, but their usefulness lies in keeping us attentive to the performers.

Bernard Herrmann’s music gives the romance a warmth that the supernatural premise alone could never supply. The score allows more feeling into the film than the dialogue alone could carry, and its generosity suits the close attention to the actors. Dorothy Spencer’s editing leaves ample space for the performances, although the leisurely rhythm can become too comfortable. Some passages need a firmer move onwards, particularly when we have already understood the attraction and are waiting for the film to develop it.

As a romantic fantasy, the film is unusually willing to let conversation do the work. There is a risk that the whole affair will seem precious, especially if the central pairing fails to win us over. We found enough warmth and curiosity in the performances to stay with it, even when the pace slackened. Anyone looking for a brisk ghost story should make another choice; this one asks for the time to watch two people become important to each other.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

72
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
85*

Newman finds the film a deeply affecting supernatural romance that builds toward a tearjerking finale. He particularly praises its evocative score, luminous cinematography, and beautifully composed close-ups of Gene Tierney and Rex Harrison.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1946 · Variety Staff
78*

Variety finds the romance warmly human and engaging. It singles out Gene Tierney’s performance and Rex Harrison’s commanding turn as the ghost.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 April 2003 · Noel Murray
70*

Murray finds the film a slowly paced but rewarding romantic ghost story with more nuance on repeat viewings. He praises the layered conversations and the ambiguity around whether the ghost exists or represents Mrs. Muir’s fantasy.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 March 2012
65*

The review is positive overall despite dismissing the story as supernatural nonsense. It praises the film’s beautiful photography and the match between Rex Harrison and Gene Tierney.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 July 1947 · John McCarten
64*

The issue lists this film within John McCarten’s multi-film Current Cinema review, but the review’s verdict is not visible. No specific praise or criticism of the film can be established from the available page.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Ghost and Mrs. Muir worth watching?
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir is worth watching for its tender, persuasive romance, and we score it 84 out of 100. Gene Tierney and Rex Harrison make the unlikely attachment believable, helped by expressive close-ups and Bernard Herrmann’s warm music, though we recommend it to patient romantics rather than anyone seeking a brisk ghost story.
How long is The Ghost and Mrs. Muir, and what is it rated?
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir runs 1h 45m. It is a romance and fantasy film.
Where can I watch The Ghost and Mrs. Muir in Norway?
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir is available to rent from Apple TV from kr 39.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Ghost and Mrs. Muir compare to A Matter of Life and Death?
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir is the quieter, more conversation-led romantic fantasy; we consider A Matter of Life and Death the stronger recommendation for a broad audience. Both ask the next world to accommodate human feelings, but the latter offers humour and expressive colour, while Lucy and Gregg’s leisurely exchanges suit those happiest watching a relationship develop.
Is The Ghost and Mrs. Muir based on a true story or a book?
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir is adapted from a novel by R.A. Dick, rather than based on a true story. No familiarity with the book is needed: we find the film’s appeal in Lucy’s conversations with her ghostly companion, which leave room to understand him either as a supernatural presence or as a creation of her imagination.
What should I watch after The Ghost and Mrs. Muir?
After The Ghost and Mrs. Muir, try A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): Another romance that asks the next world to accommodate inconvenient human feelings. Then Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88): For the ache of watching human life from just beyond its reach; and Truly Madly Deeply (1990, Fi1m 80): A sharper domestic companion, with grief and affection sharing the same rooms.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1948

Nominated
Best Cinematography, Black-and-White

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)Another romance that asks the next world to accommodate inconvenient human feelings.

  2. Portrait of Jennie (1948) · not on Fi1m yetFor another patient romance whose supernatural premise rests on the lovers’ conviction.

  3. After Life (1998) · not on Fi1m yetA quieter encounter with the dead, attentive to memory and ordinary happiness.

  4. Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88)For the ache of watching human life from just beyond its reach.

  5. Truly Madly Deeply (1990, Fi1m 80)A sharper domestic companion, with grief and affection sharing the same rooms.