Film review

The Lion King

1994 · Directed by Roger Allers, Rob Minkoff · 1h 29m · MPA G

In a sentenceJeremy Irons sounds thoroughly inconvenienced by the existence of everyone else

AnimationFamilyDrama

Simba is at the centre of an animated family drama about growing up, loss and responsibility. Jonathan Taylor Thomas voices him as a youngster, with Matthew Broderick taking over the role as he grows older. James Earl Jones voices Mufasa, Jeremy Irons is Scar, and Moira Kelly plays Nala. Nathan Lane and Ernie Sabella provide the voices of Timon and Pumbaa, while Rowan Atkinson plays Zazu. Comic encounters accompany a story in which Simba has to consider his place in the world, what belonging means and what is expected of him.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The Lion King earns its grandeur through expressive animation and a voice cast that gives the family drama weight. Its lessons can be overbearing, but the wit and feeling make this an easy recommendation.

Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff ask a fair amount of a family audience in The Lion King: attention to loss, a willingness to think about responsibility, and some patience with being told what matters. It is a fine animated drama, funny enough to survive its habit of explaining the lesson. The seriousness gives the story weight, even when the film grows pleased with its own wisdom. There is enough warmth in the performances to make the family relationships matter.

The hand-drawn animation does much of the persuading. Chris Sanders’s production design gives the scenery depth and scale, so the animals belong to places that seem to extend beyond the immediate needs of a scene. That helps the film’s grand manner feel appropriate, and there is pleasure in looking even when the storytelling becomes predictable. Allers and Minkoff allow the scenery to hold our attention without needing a joke to justify every pause.

Jeremy Irons supplies a useful corrective to the solemnity as Scar. His clipped, disdainful delivery makes the character funny without making him harmless, and gives us someone worth listening to when the film is spelling out its moral distinctions. We laughed at his impatience with everybody else; the amusement comes from how little effort Irons appears willing to expend on them. James Earl Jones’s Mufasa has the warmth and authority the drama needs, without sounding as though every line has been prepared for a public address.

The screenplay, credited to Jonathan Roberts, Irene Mecchi and Linda Woolverton, is less relaxed about telling us what to think. Its insistence on duty sometimes makes the existing order sound beyond question, and the film could afford more curiosity about who benefits from it. That matters in a story asking children to think seriously about responsibility. Yet the writing remains clear enough for the family drama to hold our attention, and the jokes usually interrupt the instruction before it becomes oppressive.

Nathan Lane’s Timon and Ernie Sabella’s Pumbaa help considerably. Their comic performances give the film some welcome untidiness, while Jonathan Taylor Thomas and Matthew Broderick make Simba an accessible centre despite having less entertaining material than Irons. Editor Ivan Bilancio keeps the changes between comedy and solemn drama brisk, with little sense of the story waiting for its next attraction. The pace is a virtue at 89 minutes, although some of the quieter feeling could use more time.

Hans Zimmer’s score is the craft contribution we find hardest to accept without reservation. It presses the film’s seriousness when the animation and voices have already made the point, and can make a simple feeling seem unnecessarily ceremonial. The grandeur is part of what Allers and Minkoff are attempting, so a modest accompaniment would hardly suit it. Even so, the performers could be trusted to carry more of those moments without such emphatic musical assistance.

Family animation need not avoid difficult feelings, and The Lion King gives children something substantial to consider alongside the comedy. Its certainty about correct behaviour limits it, but the care in the animation and the humour in the performances keep it from becoming a sermon. Be prepared for questions afterwards, including a few the film thinks it has already settled.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
1
The Hollywood Reporter
27 June 2016 · Duane Byrge
90*

The critic calls the film a magnificent animated feature and certain blockbuster that will appeal across all age groups with its wise storyline, heart, humor and energy. Directors Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff are praised for crafting a multidimensional film whose crowning glories are the animators' majestic work.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 March 2012 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The re-release confirms the film's enduring appeal through its sharp script, satisfying story and peerless vocal performances, despite a weak pseudo-world-music soundtrack. Few 3D enhancements alter the experience for those who saw it originally.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 September 2011 · ★★★ · Rob Humanick
75

Spectacle often dominates meaning to reductive effect, with thematic obviousness and cultural insensitivity, yet the film remains inventive and beautiful with breathtaking scenery and rapturous imagery. It works best when closest to its Shakespearean and biblical inspirations but opts for distraction over genuine wisdom or pathos.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 October 1994
30*

The critic finds the film a reactionary cheer for the status quo that stigmatizes the underclass while offering an ecological gloss. Its visuals are stunning but the storytelling amounts to fast-food reactionary drivel.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 June 1994 · Roger Ebert

The film is a superbly drawn animated feature that is surprisingly solemn, dealing with real issues like loss and responsibility in a way that prepares children for life's lessons. It balances fantasy with jungle realities while delivering strong performances, especially the villain Scar, and memorable sequences.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 October 1994

The critic finds the film saccharine and pompously aspirational in its Shakespearean allegory and original story, with flashy computer effects undermining the usual Disney charm. Fun elements like Timon and Scar's voice work are overshadowed by portentousness, making it inferior to earlier Disney classics like The Jungle Book.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1995

Won
Best Original Score

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 1995

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 1994

Won
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

The Jungle Book poster

The Jungle Book

1967 · Looser animal comedy, with friendship given more room than duty.

The Iron Giant poster

The Iron Giant

1999 · Another family animation that takes children’s capacity for difficult feelings seriously.

My Neighbour Totoro poster

My Neighbour Totoro

1988 · A gentler account of childhood uncertainty, with room to wander.

The Secret Garden poster

The Secret Garden

1993 · Childhood loneliness and difficult family ties, handled with patience and warmth.

Wolfwalkers poster

Wolfwalkers

2020 · Expressive animation and a sharper argument about obedience, freedom and belonging.