Two men stand on a bridge overlooking a city glowing at night
Film review

The Little Things

2021 · Directed by John Lee Hancock · 2h 08m

In a sentenceDenzel Washington does a great deal by sitting still; Jared Leto does a great deal, full stop

Los Angeles in the 1990s. Joe ‘Deke’ Deacon (Denzel Washington) is an ageing lawman with a case behind him that he has never put down. Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) is the younger detective on a run of killings the department believes to be the work of one man. The two do not work the same way, and they end up working together, with Detective Sal Rizoli (Chris Bauer), Flo Dunigan (Michael Hyatt) and LASD Captain Carl Farris (Terry Kinney) around them. Their attention settles on Albert Sparma (Jared Leto), a man who becomes their suspect and appears to relish it. Deke’s past comes back to him in pieces as the case goes on.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

John Lee Hancock’s serial-killer procedural is set in a 1990s Los Angeles it plainly misses, and Denzel Washington gives it more than the script deserves. It is patient, handsome and derivative, and its last act is the only part we still think about.

John Lee Hancock has made the kind of serial-killer film studios stopped making around the turn of the century: two detectives, one older and broken and one younger and hungry, a suspect who enjoys being suspected, and a city of night streets and bad coffee. He wrote it himself, and he writes it the way they used to be written. That is not an insult. The Little Things knows exactly what it is, and for about ninety minutes it is a decent example of it. The question is whether decent is enough, and we are not sure it is.

Washington plays Deke as a man who has learned to take up as little room as possible. He drives slowly, speaks softly, and stands at the edge of crime scenes until the younger men have finished being clever. Hancock gives him a motel room and a habit of talking to the dead, who sit on the bed and wait for him, and Washington plays these scenes without a flicker of self-pity, which is the only way they could have worked. There is a moment when he is alone at night and his face simply gives way. It lasts a few seconds and it is the best thing in the film. We were more moved by it than the story around it had earned.

Malek is stiffer. Baxter is meant to be the department’s rising man, and Malek plays him wound tight, precise, a little pleased with his own suits, which Daniel Orlandi cuts sharper than anyone else’s in the building. He is good when he is listening to Washington and less good when he has to carry a scene, and the film asks him to carry a great many. Leto arrives near the hour mark with a paunch, greasy shoulder-length hair and a walk like a man stepping off a boat, and how much of him you can take will depend on your appetite for actors who have plainly enjoyed the make-up chair. In the interrogation room he is unsettling for ten minutes. After that we found we were watching an actor rather than a suspect.

The craft is sound. John Schwartzman shoots Los Angeles at night in sodium orange and its interiors in a sickly green, the green of fluorescent tubes over a morgue slab, and he lets the dark keep most of what it holds. Michael Corenblith’s homicide bullpen is metal desks, rotary phones and a corkboard of dead women’s faces, and Sparma’s flat is a mess we could smell. Thomas Newman’s score is a low pulse with a few plaintive notes on top, and it knows when to stop, which is rarer than it should be. Robert Frazen cuts the investigation cleanly and the flashbacks less so; the flares from Deke’s past come without warning and we spent too long working out when we were.

The trouble is that the plot does not hold. Hancock wants a film about what police work does to the men who do it, and he has borrowed the mechanics of a whodunit to carry the idea, and the two keep tripping each other. Leads are followed because the running time needs them followed. A stakeout goes on far longer than any real sergeant would allow. Natalie Morales, as Detective Jamie Estrada, and Chris Bauer, as Detective Sal Rizoli, are given one function each. The women who die are photographs on a board, which the film half-notices and does nothing about.

Then the last half hour takes a turn we will not describe. It is the boldest thing Hancock has done as a writer, it explains what the film was for all along, and it makes a good deal of the previous ninety minutes look like padding. We left it unsettled rather than satisfied, and we have argued about it since, which is more than most films of this kind manage. Whether that is the film’s achievement or an accident of a script that had run out of clues, we could not tell you.

Set against Se7en (1995) and Zodiac (2007), the two films it cannot stop thinking about, it is smaller and less frightening. Set against Hancock’s own work it is his strangest and probably his most interesting. Watch it at home, late, with the lights off, and forgive it its borrowings for the sake of Washington’s face and that final turn. It runs 128 minutes and carries a 15.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
13
Mixed
12
Negative
2

Most critics lean gently positive, and nearly all of them reach for the same word: throwback. The film is read as a return to the 1990s serial-killer procedural, with Se7en and Zodiac named repeatedly as its models. Praise clusters on Denzel Washington’s weary detective, with Rami Malek and Jared Leto’s twitchy suspect also singled out. Hancock’s decision to dwell on the toll the case takes on the two men rather than on solving it is the most admired choice, along with the gloomy, well-mapped Los Angeles.

The reservations cluster on the same familiarity. Many find the script derivative and dated, the plotting implausible, and the ending either too cryptic or too timid. The spread is wide: Deadline calls it the best film in its genre for decades, while Empire finds it a dull relic with no invention. The Guardian argues that even Washington cannot save it, a view most of the reviews do not share.

Little White Lies
2 February 2021 · 3/4/3 · Erik Nielsen
80

The critic finds it a familiar but enjoyable throwback to mid-budget serial-killer procedurals, praising its character focus on the two detectives and Jared Leto’s lively turn as the suspect. It singles out the patient, slow-burn approach to the cops’ personal lives and dynamics as refreshing amid the familiar plot beats.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 January 2021 · Justin Chang
78*

The critic calls it a moody, respectable throwback to ’90s serial-killer thrillers with sturdy craftsmanship and real feeling beneath the conventions, praising the sense of menace, geography of Los Angeles, and the cast's work while noting it locates an unexpectedly steady pulse in an overworked genre.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
26 January 2021 · David Ehrlich
77*

Washington and Malek deliver as haunted detectives in a strong serial-killer throwback that mines vintage genre fun with echoes of Se7en. Jared Leto’s unhinged performance adds to the mix in this solid but familiar effort.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 January 2021 · David Rooney
74*

The film is a suspenseful neo-noir crime thriller whose strength lies in the performances of Denzel Washington and Rami Malek as cops with contrasting styles who grow closer. Hancock is more interested in the psychological toll on the investigators than solving the case, though the ending is too cryptic.

Read the full review →
The Times
12 March 2021 · ★★★☆☆ · Kevin Maher
74*

The critic calls it a derivative, workaday procedural thriller packed with familiar cop and serial-killer tropes, but praises Denzel Washington as a miracle worker who elevates the material into something compelling. They single out a brilliant scene of the character quietly crying at night as a highlight of his performance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 January 2021 · Chuck Bowen
70*

The film functions as a David Fincher tribute reel blending Se7en and Zodiac modes but feels impersonal and inconsistently executed. It has an obsessive pull through its noir imagery and the compelling Washington-Malek pairing, with a haunting atmosphere and strong central performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Little Things worth watching?
The Little Things is worth watching for anyone with a taste for slow 1990s-style serial-killer procedurals, and we scored it 60. Denzel Washington gives it more than the script deserves and the last half hour takes a turn we still argue about, but the plot in between does not hold. Watch it at home, late, with the lights off.
How long is The Little Things, and what is it rated?
The Little Things runs 2h 08m. It is a drama and crime film.
Where can I watch The Little Things in Switzerland?
The Little Things is streaming on Netflix in Switzerland, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from CHF 4.50. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Little Things, and is it suitable for children?
The Little Things carries a 15 in the UK and an R in the US, and it is a serial-killer procedural about murdered women, so it is not for children. The violence is mostly in its aftermath, seen in morgues and on a corkboard of victims' faces, and the fear comes from Jared Leto's suspect rather than from gore. Older teenagers used to crime drama will manage it.
How does The Little Things compare to Se7en?
The Little Things is the smaller and less frightening of the two, and it borrows openly from Se7en. Fincher's film is rainier, crueller and far more tightly edited, and remains the one to see if you want to be scared. Hancock's is worth a look for Denzel Washington's quiet performance and a final turn that goes somewhere the earlier film does not.
What should I watch after The Little Things?
After The Little Things, try Se7en (1995, Fi1m 88): The film this one keeps glancing at; rainier, crueller and far more frightening. Then Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91): Bong Joon-ho’s rural Korean detectives chase a killer and lose themselves; the ending haunts; and Zodiac (2007, Fi1m 91): Fincher’s decades-long hunt where the not-knowing is the point and the toll is everything.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Se7en (1995, Fi1m 88)The film this one keeps glancing at; rainier, crueller and far more frightening.

  2. Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91)Bong Joon-ho’s rural Korean detectives chase a killer and lose themselves; the ending haunts.

  3. Cure (1997) · not on Fi1m yetKiyoshi Kurosawa’s Tokyo detective and a suspect who unravels everyone who questions him.

  4. The Pledge (2001) · not on Fi1m yetJack Nicholson’s retired cop makes a promise to a dead child’s mother and cannot let go.

  5. Zodiac (2007, Fi1m 91)Fincher’s decades-long hunt where the not-knowing is the point and the toll is everything.

The Little Things (2021) review: familiar, well acted, oddly haunting (Switzerland) | Fi1m