A woman and a man sit beneath an umbrella in a grassy field
Film review

The Magnificent Seven

2016 · Directed by Antoine Fuqua · 2h 12m

In a sentenceA splendidly dressed group of men waiting for the script to give them something besides ammunition

Townsfolk facing Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard) look to Sam Chisolm (Denzel Washington) for help. A saloon confrontation establishes what Chisolm can do, while his arrival draws wary attention. Joshua Farraday (Chris Pratt) and Goodnight Robicheaux (Ethan Hawke) join a group that also includes the tracker Jack Horne (Vincent D’Onofrio). Billy Rocks (Lee Byung-hun), Vasquez (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) and Red Harvest (Martin Sensmeier) bring the number to seven. Chisolm’s task is to protect the townsfolk from Bogue, but these men must first learn to work together against an opponent who has the advantage.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Antoine Fuqua’s Western has a capable cast and a saloon confrontation worth sitting up for. Too much of the rest is thin characterisation and prolonged gunfire, with Denzel Washington doing more than the screenplay to hold our attention.

Antoine Fuqua’s The Magnificent Seven has enough good actors to keep us watching, but too little interest in the people they play. It attempts a straightforward Western about an outmatched group standing up to a bully, and there is no shame in that. The disappointment is how often Nic Pizzolatto and Richard Wenk’s screenplay relies on the cast to supply distinctions it has barely written. At 132 minutes, it has had time to introduce these men properly.

Denzel Washington gives Sam Chisolm an authority that makes him easy to accept as the group’s leader. Chris Pratt’s Joshua Farraday supplies the easier charm, though some of the humour seems to be waiting for applause. Ethan Hawke’s Goodnight Robicheaux offers a welcome suggestion of a life beyond the immediate job, while Vincent D’Onofrio makes Jack Horne an eccentric enough presence to interrupt the routine. The script gives each an introduction without quite giving them enough to do together.

The saloon confrontation briefly supplies the film we had hoped for. Mauro Fiore’s cinematography keeps the men’s faces as interesting as their weapons, while John Refoua’s editing gives the dialogue time to register without letting the exchange sag. We were gripped, because the talk makes these people seem capable of surprising one another. It is a small piece of action in which the actors remain worth watching, and it makes the later dependence on extended shooting harder to excuse.

Derek R. Hill’s production design makes the saloon feel worth spending time in even without a confrontation. Sharen Davis’s costumes are useful introductions, distinguishing men whom the dialogue too often leaves interchangeable. James Horner and Simon Franglen’s music gives the fighting urgency, though it struggles to compensate for our limited interest in the people involved. These are craftspeople doing sound work on scenes that needed another pass at the writing.

Peter Sarsgaard can make Bartholomew Bogue unpleasant, but the screenplay gives him too little beyond being the villain. The same thin writing limits the other side. With so many different men brought together, there should be friction over more than the practical business of fighting; instead, the film hurries past the questions their company raises. The townsfolk also struggle to become people we care about, which is a considerable problem in a Western built around defending them.

The action grows longer and louder without solving any of this. Some passages have an agreeable physical force, and Antoine Fuqua can organise enough movement to keep the eye occupied. Yet the extended gunfire gradually becomes tiring, because the film has not made the risk personal enough. It is possible to appreciate the work involved in staging these encounters while feeling little concern about what happens within them, and that is where too much of the film leaves us.

An ensemble Western does not need an unfamiliar plot to justify itself, since the company can be reason enough to stay. Here, there are flashes of warmth and oddness, especially from Vincent D’Onofrio, but too little of either to sustain more than two hours. An affection for the cast will have to do much of the work.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

44
Positive
4
Mixed
9
Negative
14

Most critics find The Magnificent Seven a slick but uninspired remake, with more star power than character development. Praise centres on the ensemble, particularly Denzel Washington’s commanding presence, Chris Pratt’s energy and Vincent D’Onofrio’s eccentric performance. Several reviews also credit the western imagery and the staging of the action. Even some detractors find the extended final shootout exciting, though that enthusiasm does not extend to the film around it.

The reservations cluster around thinly written characters, an overfamiliar story and too little emotional investment to make the danger matter. Several critics also find its treatment of the historical setting shallow. The spread is wide: Total Film and Time Out regard the cast and action as enough to make the remake succeed. The action itself remains contested, with The AV Club finding the climax stiff and spatially confusing where others see well-organised spectacle.

Time Out
9 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
80

Rothkopf finds the action-heavy remake succeeds in holding its own against the classic. He singles out its starry cast, led by Denzel Washington.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Jamie Graham
80

The critic finds the film not quite magnificent, but a rare remake that delivers and Fuqua’s best since Training Day. They praise Denzel Washington’s commanding performance and the film’s thrilling western imagery and action.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 September 2016 · A.O. Scott
64*

The page content is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the text provided.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
19 September 2016 · ★★½/4 · Jake Cole
62

Cole finds the film passably entertaining but ultimately disposable and lacking in energy. He praises the explosive, well-organized chaos of the climax, while faulting the direction for never letting the action fully take off.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
15 September 2016 · 4/3/3 · David Jenkins
60

Jenkins finds it a lively, effective western with some richer allegorical potential, though it does not reinvent the genre. He praises the well-chosen cast and character backstories, while criticizing the sexualized, sidelined role given to its sole female character.

Read the full review →
The Independent
22 September 2016 · ★★★ · Geoffrey Macnab
60

Macnab finds the film slow to build but ultimately a rousing, full-blooded Western. He particularly praises the prolonged final shootout for its brilliant orchestration and practical action.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Magnificent Seven worth watching?
The Magnificent Seven is a mixed Western we score 54 out of 100, with more to offer admirers of its cast than anyone seeking memorable characters. Denzel Washington holds our attention and the saloon confrontation has real tension, but thin writing and prolonged gunfire make much of its 132 minutes tiring.
How long is The Magnificent Seven, and what is it rated?
The Magnificent Seven runs 2h 12m. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch The Magnificent Seven in Singapore?
The Magnificent Seven is streaming on Netflix in Singapore, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from S$4.98. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Magnificent Seven, and is it suitable for children?
The Magnificent Seven carries a UK 12A certificate and contains prolonged, loud gunfights, making it a cautious choice for younger children or anyone sensitive to sustained violence. The certificate requires children under 12 to be accompanied by an adult at the cinema; we find the extended shooting more tiring than gripping.
How does The Magnificent Seven compare to Rio Bravo?
The Magnificent Seven is the weaker choice beside Rio Bravo if we want the pleasure of watching capable people get used to one another. Fuqua’s film leans on its cast and extended gunfire, while Howard Hawks gives his ensemble room for dry comedy and carefully rationed danger, though some conversations run longer than they need.
What should I watch after The Magnificent Seven?
After The Magnificent Seven, try Rio Bravo (1959, Fi1m 88): For the pleasure of watching capable people get used to one another. Then Seven Samurai (1954, Fi1m 95): The threatened community and its defenders receive the attention they need.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Professionals (1966) · not on Fi1m yetAnother hired band, with sharper exchanges and more difficult loyalties.

  2. Rio Bravo (1959, Fi1m 88)For the pleasure of watching capable people get used to one another.

  3. 13 Assassins (2010) · not on Fi1m yetA fighting company whose preparations give the violence real weight.

  4. The Good, the Bad, the Weird (2008) · not on Fi1m yetFor Western gunplay allowed to become properly unruly and funny.

  5. Seven Samurai (1954, Fi1m 95)The threatened community and its defenders receive the attention they need.