Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) clutches her chest among red-cloaked figures
Film review

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

2009 · Directed by Chris Weitz · 2h 11m

In a sentenceEdward leaves at twenty minutes, Bella stares out of a window for three months, and the camera stares with her

Forks, Washington. Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) turns 18 and is thrown a birthday party at the glass house of her vampire boyfriend Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) and his family. She cuts her finger on wrapping paper, Jasper Hale (Jackson Rathbone) lunges for her, and Edward decides she will be safer if he and the Cullens leave town for good. He goes. Bella spends the autumn and winter in a chair by her bedroom window, while her father Charlie Swan (Billy Burke) worries from the doorway. She is pulled back out by Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner), a friend on the reservation who repairs motorbikes in his garage and is plainly in love with her. Victoria (Rachelle Lefevre), the red-haired vampire from the first film, is still hunting her. And Bella finds that whenever she does something dangerous, she can hear Edward’s voice.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Chris Weitz has made a handsomer, steadier film than the first Twilight and a much slower one, built around an absent boyfriend and a heroine who misses him. Kristen Stewart holds it together; Michael Sheen arrives late to remind everyone it could have been fun.

Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) leaves Forks about twenty minutes into New Moon, and the film’s trouble is that he takes its pulse with him. Chris Weitz, taking over from Catherine Hardwicke, has made a better-built picture than Twilight: the camera has stopped wobbling, the colours have deepened, and there is a proper composer. He has also made one in which the heroine spends the middle hour grieving a boyfriend, and Melissa Rosenberg’s screenplay, which follows Stephenie Meyer’s novel closely, is not willing to shorten the grief. At 131 minutes it is long for a film in which the main thing that happens is that somebody goes away.

Kristen Stewart carries it, and more capably than she is usually given credit for. Bella’s months without Edward are played as a dull ache rather than a tantrum. She sits in a chair by her window while Javier Aguirresarobe’s camera circles her and the trees outside go from October to December to spring, the light on the glass changing with them. We will admit that shot got to us: the slow turn, the drizzle, Alexandre Desplat’s piano picking out a line and letting it drop. Then Rosenberg has Bella explain the same feeling in voiceover, in unanswered emails to Alice Cullen (Ashley Greene), and the feeling goes.

Taylor Lautner’s Jacob Black is what the film finds to fill the gap, and the garage scenes, two kids pulling motorbikes apart and putting them back together, are the loosest and warmest stretch. Lautner is sunny and uncomplicated and the camera likes him. But Rosenberg writes Jacob as patient, then as angry, then as patient again, and the film is more interested in his chest than in his head. When Bella comes off a bike and Jacob removes his shirt to dab the blood from her forehead, we laughed, and we were not certain the film was laughing with us. There is a good deal more of this. Tish Monaghan appears to have been told to budget for cut-off jeans.

Jacob’s secret, which the trailer gives away, arrives as a pack of computer-generated wolves the size of horses, and they are the weakest thing on screen. The fur does not move with the body, the paws never quite land on the forest floor, and Peter Lambert cuts round them as fast as he decently can. A skirmish in the woods with Victoria (Rachelle Lefevre) is over before it has become legible. The first film had cheap effects and hid them; this one has better effects and shows them off, which turns out to be worse.

The rest of the craft is sound. Aguirresarobe has swapped Hardwicke’s blue-green for amber and brown, so Forks looks like a place where it rains on leaves rather than on concrete. David Brisbin’s Cullen house, all glass and pale wood, is as good as before, and he gives the late Italian scenes a stone chamber with real weight to it. Desplat’s score is the single biggest improvement over the first film: strings and piano that take the romance seriously without underlining every line of it. Billy Burke’s Charlie remains the one adult who behaves like one, and his worry over his daughter moved us more than any of the vampire business.

Michael Sheen and Dakota Fanning turn up in the last half hour, and we will not describe what they are there for. Sheen plays Aro as a delighted host, clasping hands and beaming, and his first scene is the only moment where the film seems to know how silly it is and to enjoy that. Fanning, as Jane, says almost nothing and is properly unsettling in Monaghan’s black and red. Both are gone too soon.

Weitz made About a Boy, which was about a grown man learning to be around other people, and The Golden Compass, which spent a fortune on a polar bear and ran out of story. Here he sits between the two: tasteful, competent and apparently under instruction not to leave anything out. Gothic romance runs on danger, and the vampires here are so polite that the only real threat for most of the running time is a girl’s low mood.

If you loved the books you will have a decent evening and did not need us to tell you so. If you did not, you are watching a 131-minute wait for a boy to change his mind, and the 12A means the danger never gets more than mildly damp.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

45
Positive
1
Mixed
6
Negative
7

Most critics are unconvinced, and even the sympathetic ones hedge. The reviews agree on two things: the film gives its devoted audience what it came for, and it has little to offer anyone else. Where praise appears, it lands on Kristen Stewart, credited by several critics with carrying Bella’s heartbreak, and on the darker, moodier look, which most find an improvement on the first film. Michael Sheen’s brief turn gets a mention or two.

The reservations cluster around pace. Reviewers across the board find the middle section slow, the subplots drawn out and the adolescent angst wearing. The wolf effects draw repeated complaints, and several reviews call the supporting performances wooden. The spread is wide: Variety is alone in rating the sequel as good as or better than its predecessor, while Slant goes furthest the other way, objecting to the romance on moral grounds rather than dramatic ones.

Variety
18 November 2009 · Jordan Mintzer
75*

Mintzer finds the sequel as good as, and perhaps better than, its predecessor, despite some rushed storytelling. He especially praises Kristen Stewart’s emotionally compelling performance, which gives depth to Bella’s heartbreak.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
18 November 2009 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the accessible page.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 November 2009 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert considers the film a serviceable continuation, chiefly suited to fans of the series. Its Gothic romance is the element he singles out as central to its appeal.

Read the full review →
Time Out
17 November 2009 · ★★★ · Anna Smith
60

Smith gives the sequel a three-star assessment and frames it as a study of sexual and romantic obsession. The available excerpt highlights that thematic focus but cuts off before revealing what she praises or faults.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 November 2009 · THR Staff
55*

The critic finds the sequel exceptionally faithful to the original, with its slow pace likely to test viewers outside the fan base. They praise the committed performances and dark, moody production values, though some dialogue provokes a smirk.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 November 2009 · C- · Genevieve Koski
50

Koski finds the film tedious and unlikely to win new fans, though it delivers what its devoted audience wants. She praises the improved visuals and action, while criticizing the drawn-out subplots and wooden performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Twilight Saga: New Moon worth watching?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon is worth watching only if you loved the books, and we scored it 48. Chris Weitz has made a handsomer, steadier film than the first, with a proper score from Alexandre Desplat and a capable Kristen Stewart, but Edward leaves twenty minutes in and the middle hour is a girl grieving by a window. For anyone else it is a 131-minute wait for a boy to change his mind.
How long is The Twilight Saga: New Moon, and what is it rated?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon runs 2h 11m. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch The Twilight Saga: New Moon in Türkiye?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon is streaming on Netflix in Türkiye. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Twilight Saga: New Moon, and is it suitable for children?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon is a 12A, and the danger never gets more than mildly damp. There is a cut finger at a birthday party, a motorbike fall with a bloodied forehead and a brief, barely legible skirmish in the woods, and the computer-generated wolves are too unconvincing to frighten anyone. It suits teenagers and older children; the squeamish have little to fear.
How does The Twilight Saga: New Moon compare to Twilight?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon is the better-built film and Twilight is the better one to watch. Weitz steadies the camera, deepens the colours and brings in a real composer, but he also removes the boyfriend and slows everything down. The first film is rougher and cheaper, with worse effects it has the sense to hide, and the romance is still a surprise rather than an absence.
Is The Twilight Saga: New Moon based on a true story or a book?
The Twilight Saga: New Moon is based on Stephenie Meyer's novel of the same name, not on a true story. Melissa Rosenberg's screenplay follows the book closely, which is part of the problem, since it is unwilling to shorten Bella's months of grief. Readers of the novel will get what they came for; newcomers do not need to have read it to follow the film.
What should I watch after The Twilight Saga: New Moon?
After The Twilight Saga: New Moon, try Twilight (2008, Fi1m 70): The first one: rougher, cheaper and oddly more alive, with the romance still a surprise. Then Let the Right One In (2008, Fi1m 88): A Swedish child vampire and a lonely boy; the teenage romance done with real cold; and Only Lovers Left Alive (2013, Fi1m 81): Jarmusch’s vampires are centuries into the relationship and still bored; the mature version.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2010

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

MTV Movie Award for Best Female Performance, 2010

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Female Performance

MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, 2010

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss

MTV Movie Award for Best Male Performance, 2010

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Male Performance

MTV Movie Award for Best Movie, 2010

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Movie

Teen Choice Award for Best Villain, 2010

Won
Teen Choice Award for Best Villain

World Soundtrack Award for Soundtrack Composer of the Year, 2010

Won
World Soundtrack Award for Soundtrack Composer of the Year

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel, 2009

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble, 2009

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay, 2009

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 2009

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

If you liked this, try…

  1. Twilight (2008, Fi1m 70)The first one: rougher, cheaper and oddly more alive, with the romance still a surprise.

  2. Let the Right One In (2008, Fi1m 88)A Swedish child vampire and a lonely boy; the teenage romance done with real cold.

  3. Ginger Snaps (2000) · not reviewed yetCanadian werewolf film that treats adolescence as the monster, and is funny about it.

  4. Only Lovers Left Alive (2013, Fi1m 81)Jarmusch’s vampires are centuries into the relationship and still bored; the mature version.

  5. Wuthering Heights (2011) · not reviewed yetAndrea Arnold’s moors, mud and silence; the brooding romance New Moon is reaching for.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever