Naomi (Margot Robbie) reclining as Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) crawls toward her in a nursery
Film review

The Wolf of Wall Street

2013 · Directed by Martin Scorsese · 3h 00m

In a sentenceThree hours with stockbrokers, and we laughed enough to worry about ourselves

Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) works in a stockbroking world where making money and spending it occupy almost every waking thought. Sex, drugs and the pursuit of wealth fill his days, with Donnie Azoff (Jonah Hill), Naomi Lapaglia (Margot Robbie) and Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) among the people in his orbit. Martin Scorsese directs this crime comedy about Belfort’s appetites and the corruption surrounding them, from a screenplay by Terence Winter. Kyle Chandler plays Agent Patrick Denham, with Cristin Milioti as Teresa Petrillo.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Martin Scorsese’s stockbroker comedy is filthy, funny and worth its three hours, though it repeats itself. Leonardo DiCaprio makes Jordan Belfort compelling company without giving us much reason to like him.

The Wolf of Wall Street is a filthy, funny crime comedy that earns most of its 180 minutes, and we recommend it with a warning about repetition. Martin Scorsese gives Jordan Belfort’s greed room to be entertaining, which is bound to trouble anyone who wants a film about financial corruption to behave responsibly. Leonardo DiCaprio makes that decision work. His Belfort is so busy enjoying himself that remorse would seem an interruption. The pleasure comes from watching how far DiCaprio will go with such an unappealing man.

DiCaprio’s physical comedy is the strongest reason to stay: his willingness to look ridiculous keeps Belfort’s self-importance from taking charge of the film. We laughed, and felt grubby afterwards. The drug-fuelled behaviour is grotesque, but DiCaprio plays it with such comic commitment that our first response is delight. That discomfort is useful, because a solemn performance would let us feel superior without much effort. Jonah Hill plays Donnie Azoff with an eager vulgarity that makes the company around Belfort feel just as objectionable.

Rodrigo Prieto’s cinematography keeps the performers readable amid the frenzy; the jokes need us to see what these bodies are doing. Thelma Schoonmaker’s editing gives the physical comedy enough time to become embarrassing, while keeping the surrounding bustle brisk. A quick cut would rescue Belfort’s dignity too soon. The rhythm is so persuasive that it takes a while to notice how often we are being given another version of the same joke.

Bob Shaw’s production design gives the expensive surroundings a showiness that suits Belfort. Sandy Powell’s costumes give the men enough professional polish to make their behaviour look worse. The result is persuasive enough to make the wealth tempting, even when the people enjoying it are repellent. Terence Winter’s screenplay lets the characters speak as if their appetites need no explanation, which gives the actors something funnier to play than simple wickedness.

The length does become a problem. Winter and Scorsese keep returning to sex, drugs and extravagance after the behaviour has ceased to tell us anything new about Belfort. Individual passages remain funny, but the accumulation starts to feel laboured. Margot Robbie gives Naomi Lapaglia enough force to make us want more room for her, and the film rarely wants to stop attending to its leading man. Schoonmaker keeps finding fresh momentum inside scenes whose place in the whole is harder to defend.

Against GoodFellas and Casino, the limited range of feeling is noticeable. Scorsese has made a broad comedy here, and judging it as a failed lecture on capitalism would miss much of what is good about it. The sustained silliness strips Belfort of grandeur, even when DiCaprio’s charisma makes him difficult to resist. Yet the concentration on his pleasures leaves too little space to feel the damage beyond them. We would gladly exchange another bout of excess for a stronger sense of the people paying for it.

Go for the comedy, and do not expect the film to provide a comfortable moral distance from it. The sex and drug-taking are relentless, and the certificate is 18 for a reason. We would choose company prepared to laugh at something disreputable. Set aside the full three hours; this is a poor choice for an evening when someone needs an early night.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
15
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to The Wolf of Wall Street, with praise clustering around Scorsese’s comic energy and DiCaprio’s uninhibited performance as Belfort. The reviews repeatedly single out the physical comedy, large set-pieces and cast’s ability to sustain the frantic pace. Many see the vulgarity as central to a darkly funny account of greed, finding both fascination and disgust in the spectacle. DiCaprio’s command of broad comedy is a particular point of agreement.

The spread is wide, however, and the chief dispute concerns whether the film exposes its characters’ appetites or indulges them. Even favourable reviews find the three-hour running time excessive, with some sequences becoming laboured. The New Yorker argues that the film captures Belfort’s vitality without endorsing his predatory world; Slant Magazine finds too little distance between the filmmaking and the sales pitch. Vulture dissents more sharply, finding the spectacle monotonous and lacking consequences.

Empire
17 December 2013 · Damon Wise
90*

The critic calls it Scorsese's funniest and most focused film in a long time, with an untouchable, bravura performance from DiCaprio that makes the three-hour runtime fly by. It singles out the effortless comedy and the way the film holds a mirror to the audience and the fucked-up world we live in.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 December 2013 · A- · A.A. Dowd
90

Scorsese turns the real-life tale into a flat-out comedy as boldly excessive as the lives it chronicles, his crassest, loudest and maybe funniest film; DiCaprio channels star power into the vacuous anti-hero with a performance that builds to intensity, and the film locates black absurd humor in fascination and disgust.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
24 December 2013 · Richard Brody
90*

Scorsese's exuberant, hyper-energized film captures the vitality at the core of Belfort's predatory world without endorsing it. The movie stands as one of the director's most fully realized works thanks to its rhythmic swing and the cast's wild, exhilarating performances.

Read the full review →
Total Film
13 December 2013
85*

The critic praises it as Scorsese’s finest in 15 years and an audacious, riotous epic that forms a loose trilogy with GoodFellas and Casino, despite not quite matching those classics. It singles out DiCaprio’s magnetic, never-better performance and the film’s bold, broad screwball comedy about America then and now.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
3/4/5 · Calum Marsh
80

The review describes it as a late-career dirty bomb that is licentious and hilarious in its essay on greed and excess. It highlights the film’s irreverent, dynamic quality and Scorsese’s adept handling of the sprawling material.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
· Damon Wise
80*

The review calls it an exhilarating story of decadence and debauchery with a charismatic DiCaprio performance. It singles out the black comedy tone and the cast’s ability to sustain the demented momentum.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Wolf of Wall Street worth watching?
The Wolf of Wall Street is worth watching for anyone prepared to laugh at three hours of disreputable behaviour, and we scored it 82. Leonardo DiCaprio's physical comedy is the main reason to stay, though the film keeps returning to sex, drugs and extravagance after they have stopped telling us anything new. Set aside the full evening; it is a poor choice when someone needs an early night.
How long is The Wolf of Wall Street, and what is it rated?
The Wolf of Wall Street runs 3h 00m. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch The Wolf of Wall Street in Azerbaijan?
The Wolf of Wall Street is not on any streaming or rental service in Azerbaijan at the moment. It is available in 25 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is The Wolf of Wall Street, and is it suitable for children?
The Wolf of Wall Street is certified 18 in the UK and is not suitable for children or younger teenagers. It is not frightening, but the sex and drug-taking are relentless and the language and behaviour are filthy throughout. The squeamish should know the drug-fuelled scenes are grotesque, played for comedy rather than horror.
How does The Wolf of Wall Street compare to The Big Short?
The Wolf of Wall Street is a broad comedy about one man's appetites, while The Big Short is an angrier film that works to make the machinery of greed easier to follow. Scorsese's film is the funnier and the more repetitive; McKay's explains more and interrupts itself more often. Choose the former for the performances, the latter if you want to understand what went wrong.
What should I watch after The Wolf of Wall Street?
After The Wolf of Wall Street, try The Big Short (2015, Fi1m 80): Another financial comedy that makes the machinery of greed easier to follow. Then Sweet Smell of Success (1957, Fi1m 88): For another persuasive talker whose professional success depends on other people’s damage; and La dolce vita (1960, Fi1m 88): For wealthy people partying long after the pleasure has become difficult to locate.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2014

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Big Short (2015, Fi1m 80)Another financial comedy that makes the machinery of greed easier to follow.

  2. Sweet Smell of Success (1957, Fi1m 88)For another persuasive talker whose professional success depends on other people’s damage.

  3. La dolce vita (1960, Fi1m 88)For wealthy people partying long after the pleasure has become difficult to locate.

  4. Capital (2012) · not reviewed yetFor a colder look at bankers gambling with money that belongs to others.

  5. Sorry to Bother You (2018, Fi1m 81)Another salesman’s ascent, with stranger jokes and a sharper interest in exploited workers.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever