Film review

Us

2019 · Directed by Jordan Peele · 1h 56m · MPA R

In a sentenceLupita Nyong’o is excellent company until there are two of her

HorrorMystery

Adelaide Wilson (Lupita Nyong’o) returns to Santa Cruz for a seaside holiday with her husband, Gabe Wilson (Winston Duke), and their children, Zora Wilson (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason Wilson (Evan Alex). A childhood encounter in a hall of mirrors makes Adelaide reluctant to be back, while Gabe wants to enjoy the beach. That evening, four strangers appear in the driveway of their holiday home, wearing red jumpsuits and carrying scissors. Adelaide tries to protect her family, but each intruder looks exactly like one of the Wilsons, including her own double, Red.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jordan Peele’s Us is frightening and funny, led by Lupita Nyong’o in two unsettling performances. The explanations are less persuasive; horror fans should still find plenty to fear.

Jordan Peele builds Us around a fear that needs little explanation: somebody with our face wants to hurt us. Putting an entire family through that ordeal gives him room for domestic comedy as well as horror, and the changes between them are often unnervingly quick. This is a good, frightening film whose storytelling becomes less convincing as it grows more elaborate. Its actors keep the threat immediate even when we begin to question the reasons behind it.

Lupita Nyong’o makes Adelaide Wilson and Red feel like separate people almost immediately. Adelaide’s fear is easy to believe, while Red remains difficult to read even with that familiar face. We were frightened by the sight of someone resembling Adelaide threatening her family. The resemblance keeps making us look for something reassuring, and the performance makes that a thoroughly uncomfortable way to watch: knowing one woman gives us little help with the other.

Mike Gioulakis’s cinematography is most effective when it lets us study those faces; the resemblance needs to register for the threat to work. Kym Barrett’s red jumpsuits help by giving the doubles a recognisable appearance of their own. They are simple enough to remain alarming without requiring us to work out what each detail means. Ruth De Jong’s production design makes the family’s holiday surroundings sufficiently plausible for these figures to feel intrusive. There is an ordinary life here that we can believe the Wilsons want to protect.

Winston Duke is useful to that ordinary life as Gabe Wilson, supplying a comic ease that stops the family from existing only to be frightened. Nicholas Monsour’s editing makes the changes from comedy to danger feel abrupt without losing us. There is pleasure in a joke landing just when we have decided to stay tense. Michael Abels’s score sustains the unease through those changes, so the comedy never makes the doubles seem harmless. The humour also gives us a reason to care about the family beyond their immediate predicament.

The difficulty is Jordan Peele’s screenplay, particularly when it starts explaining how much the doubles are meant to account for. Its interest in privilege and deprivation is clear enough, and horror is well suited to making comfortable people feel threatened. But the more elaborate the account becomes, the more questions it raises about what we have been asked to accept. We started checking the story’s logic when we ought to have been worrying about the Wilsons. The later exposition interrupts the fear without making the story much more convincing.

Judged as a family-under-siege film, Us works more reliably. The doubles make the danger personal to each Wilson, and the cast gives the premise enough conviction to keep us concerned about who might get hurt. We do not need every detail settled for horror to work. We do need the explanations we are given to withstand a little thought, and this film sometimes makes uncertainty feel like unfinished writing.

Horror viewers who enjoy discussing a film afterwards will have plenty to occupy them beyond these 116 minutes. Those who need every explanation to hold together should expect some irritation. Watch it with someone who can resist explaining it while Lupita Nyong’o is still on screen.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
18
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Us, with praise centred on Lupita Nyong’o’s dual performance and Jordan Peele’s control of suspense, shocks and comedy. The reviews repeatedly highlight how Nyong’o gives the doubles emotional weight and a disturbing physical presence, while Peele makes laughter sit uneasily beside fear. Many also welcome the film’s social ambition, finding its ideas about privilege and the underclass provocative even when they resist a tidy explanation.

The reservations concern how clearly those ideas develop and how well the plotting holds together towards the end. Responses range from enthusiastic praise to qualified approval, with no outright negative reviews in this selection. Time Out finds the blend of comedy and horror confident but the story short of its promise; The Ringer admires the technical skill while finding the late exposition convoluted. Even among supporters, the allegory’s vagueness and the uneven final act remain recurring qualifications.

The Telegraph
21 March 2019 · ★★★★★ · Robbie Collin
100

The critic calls it a sinister masterclass in spiralling terror and a right-on-time sociological knockout. They single out Lupita Nyong’o’s nerve-flaying double performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 March 2019 · Justin Chang
85*

Jordan Peele achieves an artful, ruthless balance of horror and hilarity in this tour de force of comic tension and visceral release that weaponizes chuckles against the audience. The movie belongs to Lupita Nyong’o, who delivers a performance distilling emotional layers into scream-queen history.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 March 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

The critic finds it a fearsomely entertaining and thought-provoking horror fable that mixes sociopolitical satire with full-blooded chills. They single out Lupita Nyong’o’s commanding dual performance and the physicality of the shadow roles for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
21 March 2019 · 5/4/4 · Kambole Campbell
80

Peele's ambitious second film uses doppelgangers to explore underclasses and self-reflection, anchored by Nyong'o's dual role. It mixes terror, humor, and social critique effectively, though some seams show in the final act.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

It's a chilling, entertaining ride juggling comedy and horror, with a great cast led by Nyong'o, though the allegory feels clunky and plotting predictable.

Read the full review →
The Times
24 March 2019 · ★★★★ · Jonathan Dean
80

The critic finds it a worthy and creepy follow-up that is far scarier than Get Out, with vision that positions Peele as a key figure in horror. They single out Lupita Nyong’o’s terrific performance for praise.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…

The Innocents poster

The Innocents

1961 · Domestic unease and uncertain perceptions, with a lead performance worth watching closely.

Seconds poster

Seconds

1966 · For more dread about identity, bodies and the promise of a better life.

Cure poster

Cure

1997 · Patient, disturbing horror that makes ordinary encounters feel difficult to trust.

The Babadook poster86

The Babadook

2014 · A frightened parent carries the horror, with family affection under punishing strain.

Parasite poster91

Parasite

2019 · Class resentment and domestic intrusion, with jokes that make the tension worse.