Film review

Apocalypse Now

1979 · Directed by Francis Ford Coppola · 2h 27m · 18

In a sentenceA war film that makes admiring the photography feel like something to confess

DramaWar

Captain Benjamin Willard (Martin Sheen) serves in the Vietnam War, where officers give orders and soldiers struggle to make sense of the fighting. Colonel Walter Kurtz (Marlon Brando) and Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore (Robert Duvall) are among the men who wield that authority. Chief Phillips (Albert Hall), Chef (Frederic Forrest), Clean (Laurence Fishburne) and Lance (Sam Bottoms) also have to find their way through the conflict. Francis Ford Coppola’s film draws on Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness to follow men confronting violence, obedience and the possibility of losing control.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Francis Ford Coppola’s war film is frightening, absorbing and worth the discomfort. We recommend it without hesitation, though its later stretches sometimes labour over thoughts that the fighting has already made horribly clear.

We would recommend Apocalypse Now even to people who generally avoid war films. That is no promise of an easy evening. Francis Ford Coppola wants the fighting to disturb our judgement as well as our nerves, and for long stretches he manages both. The Vietnam War becomes frightening partly because the men carrying it out can seem so assured. We keep looking for someone whose authority deserves our confidence, and the performances keep making that difficult.

Martin Sheen’s Captain Benjamin Willard gives us a face we can keep watching when the film threatens to become too much. Sheen keeps the performance contained, making attention itself seem exhausting; he does not compete with everything Coppola puts around him. Robert Duvall takes the opposite approach as Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore, making certainty so forceful that it becomes alarming. Duvall is funny without making the officer harmless. The humour unsettles because the confidence behind it is also entirely convincing.

Vittorio Storaro’s photography makes the Air Cavalry assault look orderly enough to admire before its violence has properly registered. We were horrified by the attack, and disturbed by how eagerly we had watched its approach. The careful arrangement of the aircraft makes the destruction harder to dismiss as somebody else’s madness. Coppola understands the appeal of military power well enough to make it dangerous to watch. That does not excuse every beautiful image here, but the assault gives this troubling way of photographing warfare a purpose.

Editors Walter Murch, Gerald B. Greenberg and Lisa Fruchtman give the action enough clarity for that response to develop. We can take in the size of an assault without the cutting turning every movement into another jolt. The difficulty comes in sustaining attention once spectacle gives way to more deliberate, troubled encounters, and the editing mostly lets the actors set the pace. The music by Francis Ford Coppola and Carmine Coppola adds a further unease, making the fighting difficult to settle into as entertainment. The sound keeps us tense through passages where the pace slows.

Dean Tavoularis’s production design gives the warfare a physical weight that holds up against Coppola’s increasingly strange way of presenting it. There is enough disorder in the surroundings to keep the soldiers from looking like actors placed in front of an impressive backdrop. Albert Hall, Frederic Forrest, Laurence Fishburne and Sam Bottoms help for much the same reason. Their performances give the film people worth attending to beyond its officers, and make its talk about damaged humanity feel earned.

The reservations arrive when John Milius and Coppola’s writing becomes more insistent about what the war means. The debt to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is understandable, but the later solemnity sometimes makes a thought feel important simply because we are being made to wait over it. Marlon Brando’s Colonel Walter Kurtz has enough presence to hold our attention through much of this, though presence cannot make every line worth the time it takes. Some of the words could go without costing the performances anything.

Those passages are frustrating because Coppola has already shown how much he can do without spelling things out. Among war films, this is unusually alert to the pleasure an audience takes in watching an operation carried out well, and unusually willing to make that pleasure uncomfortable. The 147 minutes demand attention, including during the passages that strain for depth. Give it an uninterrupted evening, and do not expect the spectacle to make for easy company.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Little White Lies
22 May 2011 · 5/5/5 · Matt Bochenski
100

The critic hails Apocalypse Now as a gilt-edged masterpiece and one of the defining films of 1970s Hollywood, touched by genius in its portrayal of war's horror and madness. He singles out Coppola's absolute mastery of the frame and the precise layering of images in unforgettable dramatic moments like the Air Cavalry assault.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 August 1979 · Arthur Knight
90*

The critic finds the film a major achievement that holds attention throughout its long runtime and praises Coppola's mastery in blending nightmare visuals and hallucinatory sound with real human elements. He singles out the brilliantly staged set pieces, Vittorio Storaro's photography, the ensemble performances (especially Sheen, Brando, and Duvall), and the deeper exploration of war's dehumanizing madness and evil in men's hearts.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 May 1979 · festival review
40*

The critic finds the first half flashy and visually striking but criticizes the second half for being overtaken by literary pretensions and for Coppola's indecision about the ending. The film is seen as overly pretty and not living up to the hype around its long production and high cost.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo

The critic calls the film flawed but staggering cinema whose unforgettable setpieces and Vittorio Storaro's Oscar-winning cinematography evoke the psychoses of war. She singles out the surreal, nightmarish encounters and the ambiguous ending that crystallizes the reality of the Vietnam War.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 May 1979 · Dale Pollock

The film is a brilliant but bizarre validation that 'war is hell,' with strong action-adventure elements for most of its runtime that give way to surreal symbolism in the ending. It reaffirms Coppola as a top filmmaker through realistic, extreme war imagery and strong performances but may struggle commercially due to its literary roots in Conrad's 'Heart of Darkness' and political content.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1980

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Cinematography
Won
Best Sound

Cannes Film Festival, 1979

Won
Palme d'Or

If you liked this, try…

Come and See poster

Come and See

1985 · A child’s view of war, with scarcely a moment to recover

Aguirre, the Wrath of God poster

Aguirre, the Wrath of God

1972 · For another journey in which a commander’s certainty becomes everyone’s problem

The Battle of Algiers poster93

The Battle of Algiers

1966 · For military power examined through street fighting, with less room for mysticism

Fires on the Plain poster

Fires on the Plain

1959 · Hunger and exhaustion strip soldiering of its promises, without offering much relief

The Thin Red Line poster

The Thin Red Line

1998 · For soldiers thinking through terror, and landscapes that offer them no comfort