Inspector Fix (Ewen Bremner), Monique La Roche (Cécile de France) and Passepartout (Jackie Chan) look ahead inside a carriage
Film review

Around the World in 80 Days

2004 · Directed by Frank Coraci · 2h 00m

In a sentenceEven Jackie Chan cannot fight his way through all these detours

Phileas Fogg (Steve Coogan) and Passepartout / Lau Xing (Jackie Chan) share a journey around the world in this adaptation of Jules Verne’s novel. Monique La Roche (Cécile de France) is part of the adventure, with Lord Kelvin (Jim Broadbent) and Inspector Fix (Ewen Bremner) among the other figures in their story. A stolen jade Buddha adds a separate complication to the travels. The journey brings martial-arts fights and comic encounters into period settings, with Fogg and Passepartout / Lau Xing forming the central partnership.

Fi1m review

Jackie Chan and Steve Coogan make agreeable travelling companions, but their adventure keeps getting held up by extra plot. There is enough comic skill to enjoy in patches, not enough momentum for two hours.

Frank Coraci’s Around the World in 80 Days is a patchily enjoyable adventure that keeps making its own journey harder than it needs to be. Turning Jules Verne’s novel into a vehicle for Jackie Chan’s action and Steve Coogan’s dry comedy is a reasonable idea. The performers have different strengths, and watching them share a film gives us some pleasure. The trouble is the amount of business arranged around them: the travelling adventure, the stolen jade Buddha and the fights all compete for attention.

Steve Coogan is the main reason the comedy survives. His Phileas Fogg has a dry way of meeting the surrounding silliness that gives the jokes somewhere to land, without suggesting that the actor would rather be elsewhere. We laughed at his restraint alongside Jackie Chan’s physical exuberance; the difference between their approaches makes the pairing work. There is a useful generosity in both performances, with neither man needing to make the other look foolish simply to claim the scene.

Jackie Chan’s martial-arts passages supply the other reliable pleasure. His comic timing makes the fighting approachable even if choreographed combat is not usually the attraction, and the physical skill is worth watching in its own right. But a fight can be entertaining and still arrive when the story needs to get on with something else. Frank Coraci does not consistently make the action serve the adventure, so we find ourselves enjoying individual stretches while wishing the film would leave them behind.

The screenplay, credited to David Andrew Goldstein, David N. Titcher and David Benullo, gives the stolen jade Buddha too much weight. That extra strand ought to supply another reason to care about the trip; instead, it keeps dividing our attention just when the central partnership might sustain it. Tom Lewis’s editing cannot find a steady pace through these competing demands. At 120 minutes, the film has room for digressions, but too many of them feel like delays.

Phil Meheux’s cinematography makes the period locations inviting, and Perry Andelin Blake’s production design gives the film a welcome sense of somewhere to explore. Anna B. Sheppard’s costumes belong to that same appealing period presentation. There is pleasure in looking around these settings, which matters in an adventure that depends on the prospect of another destination. Trevor Jones’s score helps keep things cheerful, though it cannot supply the urgency that the storytelling lacks. Too often, the fights and gags take precedence over the places themselves.

For a comic adventure, this is oddly short of the pleasure of pressing on towards the next destination. We kept wishing the film would trust its leads with less distraction, because their company is sufficient reason to stay interested for a while. There are agreeable stretches, but they do not add up to a recommendation for the full two hours. If the attraction is Jackie Chan and Steve Coogan sharing a film, keep expectations at that scale.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

51
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews lean towards a mixed response, with a wide gap between those who enjoy the light adventure and those who find it muddled and tiresome. Praise clusters around Jackie Chan’s action and comic timing, alongside Steve Coogan’s dry wit and ability to hold his own. The more favourable accounts find the pairing agreeable enough to carry the film through its rougher passages. Period detail, locations and occasional cameos also earn approval, though these pleasures do not settle the broader doubts about the storytelling.

The main divide concerns whether the martial arts and comedy serve the adventure or overwhelm it. Radio Times admires Chan’s fighting but finds the stolen jade Buddha subplot a drag. Slant Magazine goes further, criticising both the unnecessary fights and Chan’s stereotyped portrayal. The spread is substantial rather than a disagreement over minor faults, although two of the eight reviews have no accessible verdict to explain their scores.

The AV Club
15 June 2004 · Nathan Rabin
70*

Rabin finds the film an agreeable, entertaining blockbuster despite a bumpy opening. He praises the likable pairing of Jackie Chan’s action with Steve Coogan’s dry wit.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
18 June 2004 · Mike Goodridge
64*

Screen lists this as a review of the 2004 film. The accessible page provides no verdict or specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but the accessible text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the available material.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 November 2004 · Rob Mackie
55*

Mackie finds the film pleasantly inoffensive, though it feels like another Jackie Chan buddy movie and takes liberties with the story. He praises Steve Coogan for holding his own and singles out Arnold Schwarzenegger’s cameo as especially memorable.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Gareth Moses
40

The review finds the film slowed by an unnecessary subplot. It praises Jackie Chan’s trademark martial-arts action, but says the stolen jade Buddha storyline drags things down.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
25*

The critic finds the film a slapdash, disappointing adaptation that loses the story’s sense of adventure. They praise its period detail and locations, but say the kung-fu action and gags overwhelm the central story.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Around the World in 80 Days worth watching?
Around the World in 80 Days offers patchy enjoyment for admirers of Jackie Chan and Steve Coogan, but we score it 56 and cannot recommend the full two hours. Their contrasting comic styles work well together; the competing plots and martial-arts detours too often hold up the journey.
How long is Around the World in 80 Days, and what is it rated?
Around the World in 80 Days runs 2h 00m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Around the World in 80 Days in Chile?
Around the World in 80 Days is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in Chile, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CLF 1.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Around the World in 80 Days compare to The General?
Around the World in 80 Days is the weaker choice beside The General, which we recommend for physical comedy driven by travel and machinery. Chan and Coogan make agreeable companions, but their adventure keeps losing pace to extra plot; Buster Keaton’s railway ingenuity gives the action and comedy a clearer focus, despite a thin romance.
Is Around the World in 80 Days based on a true story or a book?
Around the World in 80 Days is adapted from Jules Verne’s novel, rather than a true story. We would approach it as a vehicle for Jackie Chan’s martial arts and Steve Coogan’s dry comedy, without needing to know the book; the stolen jade Buddha strand receives more attention than the travelling adventure can comfortably accommodate.
What should I watch after Around the World in 80 Days?
After Around the World in 80 Days, try The General (1926, Fi1m 91): For physical comedy built around travel, with machinery setting the pace. Then The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77): A globe-trotting mystery whose action keeps the story moving rather than delaying it.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The General (1926, Fi1m 91)For physical comedy built around travel, with machinery setting the pace.

  2. Project A (1983) · not reviewed yetJackie Chan gets more room for elaborate fights and carefully timed physical comedy.

  3. The Great Race (1965) · not reviewed yetAnother long journey crowded with eccentrics, with more confidence in its silliness.

  4. The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec (2010) · not reviewed yetFrench period adventure with an enterprising heroine and a taste for the ridiculous.

  5. The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77)A globe-trotting mystery whose action keeps the story moving rather than delaying it.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever