Film review

Battlefield Earth

2000 · Directed by Roger Christian · 1h 57m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceTwo alien bullies and a camera that cannot stand up straight

Science FictionActionAdventure

Jonnie Goodboy Tyler (Barry Pepper) faces alien domination in a post-apocalyptic setting. He wants humanity to resist, but Terl (John Travolta) and Ker (Forest Whitaker) are the alien antagonists standing in the way of rebellion. Their contempt for humans and readiness to use violence make the struggle a physical one. The conflict follows human resistance to alien power, with Jonnie Goodboy Tyler leading the human side. Roger Christian directs this science-fiction action adventure, adapted from L. Ron Hubbard’s novel.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Roger Christian’s science-fiction adventure is noisy, muddled and mostly dull. John Travolta and Forest Whitaker offer occasional comic relief, but the tilted images and senseless plotting make 117 minutes feel like a considerable imposition.

Roger Christian’s Battlefield Earth wants the direct pleasures of a science-fiction uprising: people to root for, aliens to oppose and a reason to care who wins. It makes all three harder than they need to be. Adapted from L. Ron Hubbard’s novel, it is a tedious action film whose bluster cannot conceal how little sense the struggle makes. The trouble is not that the premise is old-fashioned. Plenty of adventure stories ask for no more than a decent hero and a threatening enemy; this one cannot make their confrontation interesting.

Barry Pepper plays Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, the human rebel, and gives the film some welcome earnestness. John Travolta’s Terl and Forest Whitaker’s Ker occupy far more of our attention as the alien villains. Their exaggerated performances occasionally suggest a comic partnership that might have worked with firmer direction and less indulgence. We laughed at their shared bluster, but the joke wears thin when we are also meant to regard these figures as formidable opponents. The humans struggle to compete for our attention, leaving Barry Pepper’s determination looking increasingly thankless.

Giles Nuttgens’s cinematography is persistently tilted, a choice that becomes tiring well before it becomes expressive. A slanted frame can make danger feel immediate, but using it so insistently makes it difficult to tell which moments deserve our attention. The muddy images compound that difficulty, particularly when the action becomes busy. We were irritated by the effort required to follow the fighting, because the framing keeps distracting us from it. Roger Christian provides plenty of violence without making its immediate stakes clear.

Patrick Tatopoulos, responsible for both production design and costume design, supplies some of the film’s more worthwhile work. There is pleasure in the creature designs, which give the alien antagonists a physical presence that their dialogue cannot sustain. The effort to make this setting feel unlike ordinary human surroundings deserves better photography. Much of that work is difficult to appreciate amid the muddiness and frantic action, leaving the designs to make a brief impression when we need time to examine them.

The screenplay by Corey Mandell and J.D. Shapiro has a more basic problem: the decisions needed to keep the story moving are difficult to believe. Science fiction can invent its own rules, but we still need to understand why people take a risk or fail to recognise one. Here, the predictable plotting and strained dialogue make the characters seem slow to grasp things simply because the next bout of action requires it. Barry Pepper cannot supply a convincing motive through determination alone. Even a broad adventure needs choices that seem to belong to the people making them.

Robin Russell’s editing does little to clarify the action, and the frantic passages somehow fail to prevent the film from feeling slow. The scenes do not build enough anticipation to make the violence exciting when it comes. Elia Cmiral’s music adds emphasis where the scenes need suspense; we are still trying to work out why these confrontations matter. At 117 minutes, the film gives its thin conflict more time than it can use.

Against the ordinary standards of an action adventure, these are substantial failures. Most critics have little patience for it, and we share their objections to the muddled storytelling and overplayed villains. There is enough commitment in the acting and design to make the waste dispiriting, but little reason to endure it for the occasional laugh. Do not choose it on the promise that a bad film will at least be funny.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

17
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
13

The consensus on Battlefield Earth is uniformly negative: all thirteen reviews reject it, with criticism centred on confused storytelling, overplayed performances and action that becomes tedious rather than exciting. Praise is scarce and largely confined to the visuals or the possibility of camp amusement. Total Film finds something to appreciate in the creature designs and visuals. Sight and Sound singles out Travolta and Forest Whitaker’s blustering alien double act as the one element worth noting.

The differences concern what, if anything, survives the muddle, rather than whether the film succeeds. Variety regards the overall look as a pleasure, while other reviews find the effects patchy or the images grubby and unclear. Travolta’s excesses similarly register as camp interest for some and an embarrassment for others. The spread remains narrow and entirely negative, with repeated complaints about ludicrous dialogue, dated science-fiction conventions and a plot whose logic fails to hold together.

Sight and Sound
· Kim Newman
30*

The critic finds the film muddy, silly and tedious, a failed big-budget sci-fi effort that fails to match earlier genre classics like Planet of the Apes. The one element singled out for note is the campy double act between Travolta and Forest Whitaker as the blustering alien villains.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
30*

The review calls the film a plodding and boring adaptation whose loud but unclear message gets lost amid violent action and effects. It singles out the overplayed bombastic performances by Travolta and Whitaker as the sneering alien villains.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 May 2000 · Robin Rauzi
20*

A wholly miserable experience stuck in a dated 1970s vibe, with ludicrous dialogue, patchy effects, and an embarrassing campy performance from Travolta. In the post-apocalyptic genre it makes "Waterworld" look like a masterpiece.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 May 2000 · Anthony Lane
20*

A pitiful excuse for an entertainment and the "Showgirls" of sci-fi, with a doomed campy effort from Travolta amid violence and poor effects. It functions neither as propaganda nor allegory but invites global derision.

Read the full review →
Total Film
2 June 2000
20*

The critic sees it as silly space-panto entertainment rather than a serious blockbuster, with predictable old-fashioned plotting and stupid decisions. He singles out the creature designs and visuals for praise amid the overall failure.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 May 2000 · Dennis Harvey
20*

An insta-camp idiot's delight and bombastic frantic "dream project" that pushes audience goodwill to the breaking point and is too dumb even for popcorn viewers. The overall look is its one non-guilty pleasure amid cliched dialogue and chaotic action.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 2000

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

If you liked this, try…

Planet of the Apes poster

Planet of the Apes

1968 · Another human faces hostile rulers, with far more intelligence behind the spectacle.

Fantastic Planet poster

Fantastic Planet

1973 · Strange animation makes humanity’s smallness under alien rule both unsettling and persuasive.

They Live poster79

They Live

1988 · Alien domination makes room for blunt satire and satisfyingly stubborn human resistance.

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · A creature attack becomes a family emergency, with humour that serves the fear.

District 9 poster81

District 9

2009 · Alien creatures and human cruelty share a grubby setting with clear dramatic stakes.