Roger Ferris (Leonardo DiCaprio) raises his hands in the desert, holding a phone in one hand
Film review

Body of Lies

2008 · Directed by Ridley Scott · 2h 08m

In a sentenceThe explosions are efficient, but Mark Strong makes us sit up by staying perfectly composed

Roger Ferris (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a CIA operator whose work involves terrorist violence, difficult conversations and personal danger. His dealings with Ed Hoffman (Russell Crowe) and Hani (Mark Strong) make judging people part of the assignment. Ferris tries to carry out an intelligence operation while navigating relationships in which other people’s intentions are difficult to read. Away from the job, a romantic relationship makes its own demands. The operation requires both action and negotiation, with Ferris trying to manage the immediate risks while deciding whom he can trust.

Fi1m review

Ridley Scott gives this espionage thriller enough force to hold our attention, and Mark Strong gives it some danger. But the crowded screenplay and thin personal drama make it a qualified choice for anyone beyond the genre’s regulars.

Ridley Scott’s Body of Lies is a capable espionage thriller that keeps making promises its screenplay cannot quite fulfil. There is enough urgency to justify an evening for those who enjoy the genre, but the film is too cluttered to become the searching account of intelligence work it seems to want to be. William Monahan gives the characters plenty to say and too little time to make it matter. The trouble is already apparent in the dialogue, which frequently mistakes professional jargon for useful information.

Leonardo DiCaprio works hard as CIA operator Roger Ferris, and that effort is useful: we believe in the strain even when we are less sure of the man. He gives the danger an immediate physical urgency, without resolving the uncertainty about what Ferris wants beyond the next demand of the job. Russell Crowe’s Ed Hoffman is a slyer presence, and their exchanges provide welcome friction. The two performances suggest a more absorbing relationship than the busy screenplay has time to explore.

Mark Strong provides the strongest reason to stay interested. As Hani, he brings such calm to his scenes with Leonardo DiCaprio that the other man’s exertions suddenly become more revealing. We felt properly uneasy during their exchanges; Hani’s composure makes every attempt to read him seem risky. Watching the actors respond to each other gives these scenes a tension that requires little assistance from the surrounding action.

Alexander Witt’s cinematography helps us read the action through bodies and distances, giving the violence an immediate force. Ridley Scott has a firm sense of where to put people when danger arrives, and the physical impact of those passages is hard to dismiss. Arthur Max’s production design gives the action credible surroundings, though the care spent on them makes the thin characterisation more noticeable. The film looks convincing well before its account of the people involved becomes persuasive.

Pietro Scalia’s editing keeps pressing ahead, but speed cannot make each new complication equally interesting. Following the plot begins to feel like work, especially when William Monahan’s dialogue gets tangled in the mechanics of the operation. Marc Streitenfeld’s music helps sustain the pressure, although we would have welcomed more room for the actors to generate it unaided. The scenes involving Hani suggest how effective a little restraint can be.

The personal material does little to help. The romantic subplot is too lightly developed to give Ferris much of a life outside his work, leaving Leonardo DiCaprio to supply depth through sheer commitment. A quieter relationship might have allowed the character to become more understandable, but the writing is impatient with that possibility. Without that material doing its share, the demands of the operation occupy space that could have made Ferris worth caring about.

By the standards of the espionage thriller, the disappointment is familiar: capable actors, serious subject matter, and an increasing dependence on conventional plotting. Ridley Scott can make the danger convincing, but the film’s attempts to explain its people are less assured. At 128 minutes, it has enough room to do more with both. Try it for Mark Strong and the bursts of action, provided unfinished character work will not spoil the evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
5
Mixed
9
Negative
5

The consensus on Body of Lies is mixed: the reviews find capable performances and technical polish, but less agreement that these make a satisfying political thriller. Praise clusters around Mark Strong’s controlled, unsettling presence and Leonardo DiCaprio’s energy, with even several detractors finding the actors stronger than the material. Ridley Scott’s handling of violence and action earns approval from some critics, though others find the staging detached or routine.

The spread is wide, with Den of Geek enjoying the excitement and DiCaprio–Crowe banter, while Variety argues that formulaic action squanders a promising premise. Reservations centre on confused or predictable plotting, thin character motivations and political observations that do not go far enough. Even favourable reviews question how much the film understands its subject; the sharper dissenters see its reliance on familiar thriller conventions as the reason it disappoints.

The AV Club
9 October 2008 · B · Keith Phipps
77

Phipps finds the film solid and timely but ultimately less memorable than its promise. He praises its clear storytelling and Crowe’s sly performance, while faulting Scott’s polite distance from the action and human drama.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 October 2008 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

Honeycutt finds the film an unsettling, largely convincing spy thriller, though its central character’s motivations are unclear. He praises Leonardo DiCaprio’s energetic performance and the film’s superb technical credits.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 October 2008 · David Denby
70*

Denby finds the thriller smart, urgent, and insightful, though it ultimately feels like a virtuosic exercise that cannot fully grasp its subject. He particularly praises Ridley Scott’s command of space and violence and the strong performances, especially Mark Strong’s and Leonardo DiCaprio’s.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 October 2008 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as a review of Ridley Scott’s 2008 film, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the accessible page.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 October 2008
64*

The review's verdict is unavailable in the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

How long is Body of Lies, and what is it rated?
Body of Lies runs 2h 08m. It is an action and drama film.
Where can I watch Body of Lies in Singapore?
Body of Lies is streaming on Netflix in Singapore, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from S$4.98. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
What should I watch after Body of Lies?
After Body of Lies, try The Battle of Algiers (1966, Fi1m 93): For political violence examined closely, without the reassurance of a star-led intelligence operation. Then The Lives of Others (2006, Fi1m 84): Surveillance becomes personal, with patient attention to the lives altered by listening.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (1965) · not reviewed yetA colder espionage story, with deception given time to damage the people involved.

  2. The Battle of Algiers (1966, Fi1m 93)For political violence examined closely, without the reassurance of a star-led intelligence operation.

  3. The Lives of Others (2006, Fi1m 84)Surveillance becomes personal, with patient attention to the lives altered by listening.

  4. A Most Wanted Man (2014) · not reviewed yetAn intelligence operation whose human costs receive the attention they deserve.

  5. The Bureau (2015) · not reviewed yetLonger acquaintance with intelligence officers makes professional secrecy feel difficult to live with.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever