Film review

Hook

1991 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 22m · MPA PG

In a sentenceDustin Hoffman is having fun; the long stretches without him feel rather inconsiderate

AdventureFantasyComedyFamily

Steven Spielberg’s Hook revisits Peter Pan through Peter Banning, played by Robin Williams, in an adventure centred on redemption. Dustin Hoffman plays Captain Hook, Julia Roberts is Tinkerbell and Bob Hoskins is Smee. Neverland and the Lost Boys form part of this reworking of the tale, which combines fantasy, comedy and family adventure. Maggie Smith appears as Granny Wendy, alongside Caroline Goodall as Moira, Charlie Korsmo as Jack and Amber Scott as Maggie. Arthur Malet plays Tootles, and Isaiah Robinson is Pockets.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Steven Spielberg’s Hook is a disappointing fantasy with a funny villain. Dustin Hoffman supplies the mischief, but the crowded scenery and overworked sentiment make the adventure feel longer than its 142 minutes.

Steven Spielberg’s Hook wants to make Peter Pan mean something to adults without losing the children. It settles on redemption, then spends so long insisting upon it that the adventure starts to feel like compulsory good behaviour. This is a disappointing fantasy with a fine comic villain and scattered pleasures, stretched across 142 minutes. The familiar characters provide a reason to begin watching, but the film has trouble keeping them interesting.

Robin Williams plays Peter Banning, the film’s Peter Pan, with a warmth that deserves a less insistent script. The screenplay, by James V. Hart and Malia Scotch Marmo, leaves little doubt about the importance of redemption, and even less room for the audience to discover that importance for itself. Williams is an appealing presence, but too often he seems occupied with making the lesson convincing. We would have welcomed more of the mischief promised by a fantasy comedy with Peter Pan at its centre.

Dustin Hoffman’s Captain Hook provides a welcome interruption. His pantomime grandeur works because he lets some vulnerability show through it, giving us a reason to care about this ridiculous man. We laughed at Hoffman and Bob Hoskins together, because Smee’s presence makes Hook’s grand manner look rather silly. Hoskins gives those exchanges an ease that is scarce elsewhere. For a while, Spielberg allows two actors to enjoy each other’s company without pressing us to learn anything from it.

Norman Garwood’s production design offers plenty to inspect, although Neverland is so crowded that it becomes difficult to know where to look. Dean Cundey’s photography does too little to separate the people from their surroundings, so the scenery keeps competing with the performances. Some of the detail is enjoyable, and the effort deserves acknowledgement. Yet the place rarely suggests that there might be anything beyond the set, which limits the pleasure of visiting an imaginary world.

Michael Kahn’s editing cannot make the running time feel proportionate to the material. The solemn passages linger, and the return to comedy seldom lasts long enough to restore much momentum. Cutting faster would not necessarily have helped, since Hart and Scotch Marmo keep returning to emotions they have already explained. What is missing is the sense of a fresh discovery just ahead, something that might make us stop noticing how long we have been sitting there.

Julia Roberts’s Tinkerbell brings some welcome lightness, and John Williams’s score gives the fantasy an eagerness that the scenes do not always possess. The music can make the prospect of adventure seem inviting even when the film is struggling to get on with it. Elsewhere, its emotional emphasis adds to Spielberg’s heavy handling of the sentiment. The actors already have enough to persuade us of without the score making another appeal on their behalf.

Family fantasy can accommodate a lesson, but it needs room for nonsense and the possibility of something going pleasantly wrong. Hook is too anxious to make its feelings understood to allow much of that freedom, despite the comic life Hoffman and Hoskins bring to it. If those two are the attraction, be prepared for a long evening between their exchanges.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

4 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
3
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Purists will shudder at Spielberg's take on the classic tale, but children will enjoy the 1990s trimmings and derring-do. The film is stolen by Dustin Hoffman's pantomimic yet sympathetic Hook, with delightful scenes between him and Bob Hoskins as Smee, though sentimentality can get sticky.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
11 December 1991 · Roger Ebert
30*

The film is a lugubrious retread of the Peter Pan story that fails to re-imagine the material in any fresh or urgent way. Ebert singles out the cluttered and disappointing Neverland sequences for particular complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · BC
30*

Spielberg's Hook looks like a theme park, with the Peter Pan plot rejigged around redemption and production values that are often unpleasant on the eye. The best thing is Julia Roberts as Tinkerbell, but the film is ultimately duff.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
20*

The critic calls this a bloated disappointment and the lowest point in Spielberg's canon, lacking the director's usual hallmarks. Some visual pleasures exist, but the reinvention of the Lost Boys and slapstick finale are unforgivable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 December 1991 · Vincent Canby

Spielberg's update is too much and a financial gamble that must appeal to everyone, yet the charm of the original is not entirely lost. Canby singles out Dustin Hoffman's bravura comic performance as Captain Hook for praise.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1992

Nominated
Best Costume Design
Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Visual Effects

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress, 1992

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

The Thief of Bagdad poster

The Thief of Bagdad

1940 · For another fantasy adventure with magic, elaborate sets and a proper villain.

The Red Balloon poster

The Red Balloon

1956 · A child’s adventure that finds its magic without crowding the screen.

Time Bandits poster

Time Bandits

1981 · Another childhood adventure, with stranger destinations and less patience for respectable adults.

The Princess Bride poster

The Princess Bride

1987 · Swordplay and comic villains, with affection that survives the jokes.

My Neighbour Totoro poster

My Neighbour Totoro

1988 · A gentler childhood fantasy that gives curiosity more space than instruction.