Julia Child (Meryl Streep) sits with Paul Child (Stanley Tucci) on a park bench
Film review

Julie & Julia

2009 · Directed by Nora Ephron · 2h 03m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceMeryl Streep and Stanley Tucci are such good company that the other half starts to feel like an interruption

Julia Child (Meryl Streep) and Julie Powell (Amy Adams) are two women whose lives become the subject of parallel stories about food. Julia’s husband, Paul Child (Stanley Tucci), shares her part of the film, which draws on the women’s memoirs. Cooking provides the connection between them, while their personal relationships bring other concerns into the kitchen. The film moves between Julia’s experiences and Julie’s account of her own life, following two women for whom making something to eat becomes a subject worth writing about.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci give Julie & Julia a funny, affectionate marriage worth spending an evening with. Nora Ephron’s parallel stories are less evenly matched, leaving Amy Adams with the harder job and the film a little overlong.

Nora Ephron’s Julie & Julia is a warm, uneven film about cooking that is most persuasive when it watches a marriage. Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci give Julia Child and Paul Child an affection that feels established, comfortable and still capable of delight. We recommend it for that company, with the caveat that the two stories do not hold our attention equally. The trouble is built into the pairing of Julia Child’s life with Julie Powell’s account of her own.

Nora Ephron, who also writes the screenplay, wants to give both women their due. That is a reasonable ambition, and there is something appealing about treating cooking as work worthy of a person’s time and a film’s sustained attention. The kitchen is allowed to matter without much apology or explanation. But the parallel construction repeatedly asks us to feel a connection that the individual stories do not always earn.

Meryl Streep makes Julia’s enthusiasm funny without treating her as a fool. The performance is large, but Julia’s humour never cancels out her intelligence, and the warmth lasts after we have stopped smiling. Stanley Tucci helps by giving Paul an affection that does not need to compete with hers. We were moved by their ease together: the pleasure they take in one another makes the marriage feel worth spending time with.

Amy Adams has the less rewarding half, and blaming her for the imbalance would be unfair. Julie’s story has a narrower emotional range, and it relies too heavily on Julia to keep us interested. Nora Ephron’s screenplay needs to make Julie’s experiences compelling in their own right before asking us to spend quite so much time with them. Richard Marks’s editing keeps the two accounts in circulation, but the regular returns to Julie begin to feel dutiful.

Stephen Goldblatt’s cinematography and Mark Ricker’s production design make this an inviting film to look at, though we wanted the food to command more attention. The images encourage us to settle in, and the cooking sometimes feels secondary to the generally agreeable surroundings. Alexandre Desplat’s music adds warmth, occasionally more than a scene needs when the actors have already supplied it. These choices are pleasant in themselves, but together they can make the film reluctant to let anything feel awkward for long.

At 123 minutes, it also stays a little too long. There are stretches when the repeated movement between stories becomes tiring, and cutting back Julie’s share might have helped. Still, the attention given to companionship, appetite and women’s work is welcome, even when the film makes too much fuss about joining them together. Romantic drama often depends on keeping people apart; Julia and Paul’s enjoyment of being together supplies enough interest here.

Anyone coming for a concentrated portrait of Julia Child should expect frustration, since the film insists on keeping Julie beside her. Those willing to accept the imbalance will find humour and tenderness, particularly whenever Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci share the screen. We would happily spend an evening with them, even when the film makes us wait our turn. Allow a little patience for the other half.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
7
Mixed
6
Negative
2

The reviews lean favourable, though enthusiasm for Julie & Julia is less consistent than the praise for Meryl Streep. Her portrayal of Julia Child draws approval across the critical divide for its warmth, humour and conviction. Stanley Tucci also earns praise, particularly for the believable, affectionate marriage he creates with Streep. Supportive critics find the film funny and comforting, with enough feeling in its domestic scenes to give the sweetness substance.

Reservations centre on the pairing of Child’s life with Julie Powell’s story, which several critics find shallow or less engaging by comparison. The spread is broad: some welcome the romance and lightness, while others find the film slow, overlong or too sentimental. Variety offers the sharpest dissent, arguing that the tidy parallel stories trivialise Child’s legacy and leave opportunities for vivid food imagery unexplored. Even the negative reviews, however, make room for Streep’s performance.

Empire
26 September 2008 · Angie Errigo
85*

Errigo finds the film deliciously funny and warming, with a winning love story. She especially praises Meryl Streep’s performance as Julia Child, calling it brilliant and deeply touching.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 August 2009 · Russ Parsons
85*

Parsons recommends the film and finds it superb on several levels. He especially praises Meryl Streep’s deeply convincing portrayal of Julia Child.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 September 2009 · Philip French
85*

Philip French finds the film delightful, civilised and engaging, with Meryl Streep’s affectionate, humorous portrayal of Julia Child a highlight. He faults the film for omitting British cook Elizabeth David’s contribution to popularising French and Mediterranean cooking.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Stella Papamichael
80

The review is positive about the film. It especially praises Meryl Streep’s lively, humorous portrayal of Julia Child.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint could be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
24 July 2009 · Fionnuala Halligan
64*

The available page identifies this as a review, but its critical verdict is not visible. No specific praise or complaint can be established from the accessible text.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Julie & Julia worth watching?
Julie & Julia is worth watching for Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci’s funny, affectionate portrayal of marriage, and we score it 72 out of 100. We recommend it to those who enjoy warm relationship dramas, with patience required for the less compelling Julie Powell story and a slightly overlong running time.
How long is Julie & Julia, and what is it rated?
Julie & Julia runs 2h 03m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a romance and drama film.
Where can I watch Julie & Julia in the US?
Julie & Julia is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Julie & Julia, and is it suitable for children?
Julie & Julia has a UK 12A certificate, meaning children under 12 need an accompanying adult at the cinema. The certificate alone does not establish how violent or frightening it is; our review centres on cooking and adult relationships rather than content concerns. We recommend it for its performances and companionship, not specifically as children’s entertainment.
How does Julie & Julia compare to Babette's Feast?
Julie & Julia offers warm, talkative companionship, but we favour Babette’s Feast for the deeper feeling it finds in cooking and eating. The latter rewards patience and leaves room for silence, despite an opening stretch that leans on narration. Choose Julie & Julia for Streep and Tucci’s affectionate marriage, accepting that its parallel stories are uneven.
Is Julie & Julia based on a true story or a book?
Julie & Julia draws on Julia Child’s and Julie Powell’s memoirs, using their accounts of their lives for parallel stories connected by cooking. We find the pairing uneven, but no familiarity with the books is needed to follow it. Our assessment concerns how the two stories work together, rather than how faithfully the film reproduces its sources.
What should I watch after Julie & Julia?
After Julie & Julia, try Babette's Feast (1987, Fi1m 86): Cooking carries deeper feeling here, with patience and room for silence. Then Big Night (1996, Fi1m 84): Try this for cooking, difficult partnerships and the pleasure of Stanley Tucci; and Paterson (2016, Fi1m 84): Another gentle account of making things while getting on with daily life.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. Babette's Feast (1987, Fi1m 86)Cooking carries deeper feeling here, with patience and room for silence.

  2. The Lunchbox (2013) · not on Fi1m yetFood connects lonely lives in a romance that knows when to hold back.

  3. Eat Drink Man Woman (1994) · not on Fi1m yetFamily dinners give affection, resentment and appetite equal space at the table.

  4. Big Night (1996, Fi1m 84)Try this for cooking, difficult partnerships and the pleasure of Stanley Tucci.

  5. Paterson (2016, Fi1m 84)Another gentle account of making things while getting on with daily life.